ADVERTISEMENT

Good News Trump haters...

Meh he does use some meaningful measures but 2 of his questions ask about if the incumbent or the challenger is charismatic. And that's kind of an ill defined term. Some people might say a person has a lot of charisma while others would disagree.

All in all I would say polls are the best predictor we have. And when you get right down to it the polls can often only tell you when one side is clearly winning, many of our elections are close races and the polls really can't answer how those will turnout.

Also he mentions "voters don't fall for this" but he doesn't take into account the 2 elections since 1984 in which the winner did not win the popular vote.
 
Meh he does use some meaningful measures but 2 of his questions ask about if the incumbent or the challenger is charismatic. And that's kind of an ill defined term. Some people might say a person has a lot of charisma while others would disagree.

All in all I would say polls are the best predictor we have. And when you get right down to it the polls can often only tell you when one side is clearly winning, many of our elections are close races and the polls really can't answer how those will turnout.

Also he mentions "voters don't fall for this" but he doesn't take into account the 2 elections since 1984 in which the winner did not win the popular vote.

None of it is an exact science.

It's interesting, though.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT