ADVERTISEMENT

Gowdy & Company...

I am surprised you haven't seen the punches. There have been many. I think anyone watching can easily the level of obfuscation being slung out by the former Secretary. It is actually comical to watch her squirm. The main thing is to get her to lie, lie, and lie, which she is doing. Now she is on the record and the fun can begin.

Excellent point regarding shiny object syndrome.

150119.shinynewobject1.jpg
 
Timeline...

9/11/12.... Benghazi attack happened


9/12/12...... Hillary emails Chelsea and a foreign leader (in Egypt IIRC) that the attack was planned and not due to a video


9/14/12...... Hillary is at Andrews AFB when the bodies are brought back and blames the video


9/16/12. (approx) ...... Susan Rice makes rounds on Sunday talk shows blaming video for this spontaneous demonstration


9/20/12 (approx)...... President Obama goes to the UN and blames the video







This was a coverup. The administration just lied about it. They are gross ppl.
 
Last edited:
Serious question for anyone:

What is the actual, stated purpose of these hearings?
To find out what happened at Benghazi and why, so steps can be taken to avoid a repetition -- and presumably, people can be held responsible for any errors they may have made. This would involve the reasons for the people being there, the reason the security was at the level it was, whether additional security was requested -- and if so, why it was not provided -- whether help was requested after the attack began -- and if so, why it was not provided -- and whether the administration was truthful in reporting the events.
 
To find out what happened at Benghazi and why, so steps can be taken to avoid a repetition -- and presumably, people can be held responsible for any errors they may have made. This would involve the reasons for the people being there, the reason the security was at the level it was, whether additional security was requested -- and if so, why it was not provided -- whether help was requested after the attack began -- and if so, why it was not provided -- and whether the administration was truthful in reporting the events.

Thank you LC.
 
This hearing is a travesty, a sad testimony to what has happened to a once respectable Republican Party. And a great boost to Hillary's campaign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Followup, has any of that been "uncovered" via the hearing thus far?

Might want to see the questions and answers again from today.
She was once again proven to be a habitual liar.
This will get good when the other witnesses come - especially Sid B. I'm guessing he might be found in a park from suicide soon.
 
Might want to see the questions and answers again from today.
She was once again proven to be a habitual liar.
This will get good when the other witnesses come - especially Sid B. I'm guessing he might be found in a park from suicide soon.

Blumenthal has already testified hasn't he? They voted to not release transcripts of his testimony today, presumably because it backs Clintons story. Admittedly this doesn't mean much, as Blumenthal would sell his mothers soul to back the Clintons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Followup, has any of that been "uncovered" via the hearing thus far?
I haven't watched it all. Took time off to play a quick 18 holes (badly).

It has been confirmed that Hillary and the rest of the administration lied for a week or more about the reasons for the attack; I guess that really isn't new to those of us who have followed the matter.

We learned that repeated calls for additional security never got to the Secretary of State. Or more precisely, we learned that she says they never did.
 
I haven't watched it all. Took time off to play a quick 18 holes (badly).

It has been confirmed that Hillary and the rest of the administration lied for a week or more about the reasons for the attack; I guess that really isn't new to those of us who have followed the matter.

We learned that repeated calls for additional security never got to the Secretary of State. Or more precisely, we learned that she says they never did.

Actually lied in the end/middle of a election for her boss. Think that played a part?
Everyone really needs to watch Jordan and Gowdy video's from today.
She is a witch and will either burn here or in hell.
I still think Gowdy and Jordan are setting a trap to come from the future witnesses. I also think She knows this might be coming.
 
I haven't watched it all. Took time off to play a quick 18 holes (badly).

It has been confirmed that Hillary and the rest of the administration lied for a week or more about the reasons for the attack; I guess that really isn't new to those of us who have followed the matter.

We learned that repeated calls for additional security never got to the Secretary of State. Or more precisely, we learned that she says they never did.

I will take you at your word that the first paragraph is true. The second is demonstrably false, at least by any of the testimony heard. Why would the Secretary be involved in security matters? There was staff for that. They haven't found any emails sent to Hillary by anyone asking for more security for Benghazi.
 
I will take you at your word that the first paragraph is true. The second is demonstrably false, at least by any of the testimony heard. Why would the Secretary be involved in security matters? There was staff for that. They haven't found any emails sent to Hillary by anyone asking for more security for Benghazi.
???? That's what I said. We learned she claims she didn't know they wanted more security.
 
Does this man not look and sound like the poster child of Southern inbreeding?...

oes
Mr-Trey-Gowdy.jpg
Eventually, Gowdy’s questions turned to emails that Blumenthal had sent to Clinton. The former secretary of state had said publicly that they were unsolicited emails from an old friend. In question after question, Gowdy grilled Blumenthal about the definition of unsolicited. The meaning of the word, Gowdy proclaimed, was “unwanted”—yet Clinton had clearly made statements in her emails that she appreciated Blumenthal’s input. The congressman persisted with his incorrect definition to prove Clinton lied about a topic unrelated to Benghazi until Blumenthal’s lawyer suggested looking up unsolicited in the dictionary (it means “not requested,” as the Democrats later pointed out). Gowdy immediately moved on to another topic unrelated to the Benghazi attack.
 
And no one has lied about how Americans came to be killed. Funny how no hearings were ever held over the Americans killed in embassy attacks during the Bush administration. Where was your outrage then? Using this horrible tragedy, as the Republicans have been doing, for political gain is the truly despicable activity related to this investigation.
This is such a pathetic argument and explains why we have such a disgusting political system. Until we demand better from our elected officials, we'll continue to get exactly what we deserve. People like you are a bigger problem than the actual pols bc you actually encourage and excuse their dishonesty. Congrats on being a shill.
 
Actually lied in the end/middle of a election for her boss. Think that played a part?
Everyone really needs to watch Jordan and Gowdy video's from today.
She is a witch and will either burn here or in hell.
I still think Gowdy and Jordan are setting a trap to come from the future witnesses. I also think She knows this might be coming.

Based solely on posts in this thread, you are giving a lot of credit to a guy who doesn't know the simple definition of unsolicited.
 
Actually lied in the end/middle of a election for her boss. Think that played a part?
Everyone really needs to watch Jordan and Gowdy video's from today.
She is a witch and will either burn here or in hell.
I still think Gowdy and Jordan are setting a trap to come from the future witnesses. I also think She knows this might be coming.
HILLARY.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
To find out what happened at Benghazi and why, so steps can be taken to avoid a repetition -- and presumably, people can be held responsible for any errors they may have made. This would involve the reasons for the people being there, the reason the security was at the level it was, whether additional security was requested -- and if so, why it was not provided -- whether help was requested after the attack began -- and if so, why it was not provided -- and whether the administration was truthful in reporting the events.
And it takes the repubs how many committees to figure this out? Surely, HRC is not so much smarter than all those committees that she has outwitted all of them. Or maybe she is.
 
And it takes the repubs how many committees to figure this out? Surely, HRC is not so much smarter than all those committees that she has outwitted all of them. Or maybe she is.
I agree Hillary has outwitted her critics. She is doing it be sheer bluster and by hiding information. It doesn't hurt that she has a large group of enablers.
 
Must have missed the part where the Bush administration blamed all of these on videos. Did we leave these people to fight for themselves for hours on end only to eventually be tortured and killed?

If only we would have had multiple costly committee investigations into these previous embassy attacks to get the bottom of exactly what went wrong and what we could have done better. We could have avoided the Benghazi attack. I blame the bush administration for failing to keep our embassies safe then and now.
 
Timeline...

9/11/12.... Benghazi attack happened


9/12/12...... Hillary emails Chelsea and a foreign leader (in Egypt IIRC) that the attack was planned and not due to a video



9/14/12...... Hillary is at Andrews AFB when the bodies are brought back and blames the video


9/16/12. (approx) ...... Susan Rice makes rounds on Sunday talk shows blaming video for this spontaneous demonstration


9/20/12 (approx)...... President Obama goes to the UN and blames the video

This was a coverup. The administration just lied about it. They are gross ppl.



9/11/12.... Benghazi attack happened


9/12/12...... Hillary emails Chelsea and a foreign leader (in Egypt IIRC) that the attack was planned and not due to a video

No - she said the attack was by al Qaeda. Later Intel said it was due to the video. She never mentioned planned attack or a video in the below email to Chelsea. Intel information was very volatile and changed often.


Clinton_ER_20151022131019.jpg



Obama on Sept 12:

"Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe," he said. "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done."



9/14/12...... Hillary is at Andrews AFB when the bodies are brought back and blames the video


9/16/12. (approx) ...... Susan Rice makes rounds on Sunday talk shows blaming video for this spontaneous demonstration


9/20/12 (approx)...... President Obama goes to the UN and blames the video
see above Obama quote on 9/12/
 
If only we would have had multiple costly committee investigations into these previous embassy attacks to get the bottom of exactly what went wrong and what we could have done better. We could have avoided the Benghazi attack. I blame the bush administration for failing to keep our embassies safe then and now.

In reality the other investigations and especially the review board were partisan kangaroo court cover ups.
This is the first investigation that got to the server problem, numerous lies to the public, etc..
I watched much of the scene yesterday. I'm not quite sure how Elijah Cummings if he had any decency could look in a mirror, shave and not slit his throat on purpose if he used a straight razor. What a maggot.
 
I agree Hillary has outwitted her critics. She is doing it be sheer bluster and by hiding information. It doesn't hurt that she has a large group of enablers.

Opinion piece that hits the nail on the head regarding the hearing.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015...at-benghazi-hearings-and-it-was-chilling.html

...It was a masterful performance. She showed enormous discipline and nearly super-human stamina.

She let nothing slip. But in the end she let everything slip. She got a perfect score, but failed the test.

She didn't mean to, but she showed us a glimpse into her soul.

It was chilling.
We now know that when Secretary Clinton met the plane carrying the bodies of the four Americans who died at Benghazi that the Obama administration had initially lied about what happened.

She stood over the flag-draped coffins of four dead Americans knowing that the first narrative blamed their deaths on an Internet video, which caused a demonstration outside the consulate to turn into a deadly attack, when she already knew the truth.

She looked into the eyes of the families of the fallen heroes knowing all about that.

She always knew they died from a planned terrorist attack from an Al Qaeda-like group. That's what she told her family and foreign leaders according to newly released emails...
 
  • Like
Reactions: rolfey
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT