ADVERTISEMENT

Grassley proposes overturning California livestock regulations

California is only dictating standards on their market. Grassley & the Iowa pork producers are the ones trying to dictate how the entire industry operates.

Problem is it's the large national packing firms like Smithfield, Farmland and Tyson that will ultimately dictate this,.. If California sets a special standard these packers will be faced with either requiring their suppliers to comply or simply stop shipping to California,.. Since it would be cost prohibitive to produce a separate "California compliant" product line, I suspect that they will choose to lean on producers across the board,.. The proposed Grassley bill doesn't dictate production methods, rather it prevents individual states from dictating production methods on a national level...
 
Last edited:
Problem is it's the large national packing firms like Smithfield, Farmland and Tyson that will ultimately dictate this,.. If California sets a special standard these packers will be faced with either requiring their suppliers to comply or simply stop shipping to California. I suspect that they will choose to lean on producers,.. The proposed Grassley bill doesn't dictate production methods, rather it prevents individual states from dictating production methods on a national level...
Kinda like Texas and school books until Common Core came about?
 
Kinda like Texas and school books until Common Core came about?

Sort of,.. California is certainly free to dictate agricultural business inside it's state, but their reach should end at the state border,.. If they stick to their guns, do it with incentives, and their markets are desirable enough, producers that want to pursue that business will do so at their own pace.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: CaboKP and cohawk
Problem is it's the large national packing firms like Smithfield, Farmland and Tyson that will ultimately dictate this,.. If California sets a special standard these packers will be faced with either requiring their suppliers to comply or simply stop shipping to California. I suspect that they will choose to lean on producers,.. The proposed Grassley bill doesn't dictate production methods, rather it prevents individual states from dictating production methods on a national level...

Hog producers outside of California are under no legal obligation to implement these standards, so they are not dictating anything on a national level. Non-California based producers are still able to sell their pork in 49 other states if they do not want to change their operation.
 
Hog producers outside of California are under no legal obligation to implement these standards, so they are not dictating anything on a national level. Non-California based producers are still able to sell their pork in 49 other states if they do not want to change their operation.

Absolutely correct,.. But for the reasons I described this will play out badly for small producers. Personally, I'd love to see California go without pork for awhile because of this, but I doubt that happens.
 
Absolutely correct,.. But for the reasons I described this will play out badly for small producers. Personally, I'd love to see California go without pork for awhile because of this, but I doubt that happens.

If Tyson, Farmland, etc decide to implement these standards on a national scale, than it wouldn't be California dictating how production is done it will be the market dictating how production is done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
If Tyson, Farmland, etc decide to implement these standards on a national scale, than it wouldn't be California dictating how production is done it will be the market dictating how production is done.

Again, absolutely correct,.. But like I said, allowing the tail to wag the dog will ultimately be bad for small producers,.. And besides, if California believes that they require a special product, then they should pay the price and not foist the added cost onto the entire nation...
 
Chuck would be wise to be careful here. It seems that he wants federal law regulating livestock production standards to override state laws. He's not likely to be around to see it, but the shoe may be on the other foot someday.
 
A few things.

Bacon makes almost anything taste better. I just had some this morning. It's delicious.

Secondly, states should absolutely have the right to set their own rules. Grassley is off base on this one.

Lastly, a little known fact...California is #13 in the country for pork production.
 
Chuck would be wise to be careful here. It seems that he wants federal law regulating livestock production standards to override state laws. He's not likely to be around to see it, but the shoe may be on the other foot someday.

That's not what the bill in question does,.. from the OP:

"The bill would prohibit states from imposing regulations on the production of agricultural products if those products originate outside the state."
 
Secondly, states should absolutely have the right to set their own rules. Grassley is off base on this one.

The Grassley bill does not prevent California from establishing rules governing the production of food products produced inside their state.
 
So we are fighting more humane conditions for animals raised for slaughter…. Sounds like something China would do. That is very Iowa, while we poison our land and water with chemicals that cause us to have the highest rate of cancer in the US and just ignore it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
JR actually reminded me that I need to pull a pack of Edgewood's peppered bacon out of the deep freeze for this weekend. Getting half a boner just thinking about it.
I'm gonna get a couple lbs from there next time I'm in that area. Hate buying it 3rd party for an extra $5 a lb. Stuff from protivin is 4.99 a lb in house and 10.99 a lb at HyVee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McLovin32
If this is a surreptitious work around Iowa’s weed laws, I’m for it.
 
Every industry operates a PAC and attempts to lobby their cause, unconcerned about that,.. My issue is California trying to wag the dog, by dictating to the entire pork industry...
California has the right to dictate how the pork is raised that's sold in California. Iowa has the right to raise the pork they sell how they want. California doesn't have the right to dictate how Iowans raise their pork. Iowans don't have the right to insist Californians buy their pork.
This is exactly how it is and how it should be. Californians will have to live with their choices and Iowans will to.

Grassley needs to worry about bathroom bills.
 
Sort of,.. California is certainly free to dictate agricultural business inside it's state, but their reach should end at the state border,.. If they stick to their guns, do it with incentives, and their markets are desirable enough, producers that want to pursue that business will do so at their own pace.
Over 63% of California voters and the SCOTUS disagree with you. This is a settled issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Problem is it's the large national packing firms like Smithfield, Farmland and Tyson that will ultimately dictate this,.. If California sets a special standard these packers will be faced with either requiring their suppliers to comply or simply stop shipping to California,.. Since it would be cost prohibitive to produce a separate "California compliant" product line, I suspect that they will choose to lean on producers across the board,.. The proposed Grassley bill doesn't dictate production methods, rather it prevents individual states from dictating production methods on a national level...
Hmm states rights anyone?

You can pass more strict regulations at the state level. That’s always been the case. California is the wealthiest US state. Pork producers will comply.
 
Hmm states rights anyone?

You can pass more strict regulations at the state level. That’s always been the case. California is the wealthiest US state. Pork producers will comply.
Likely some will. California only consumes 13% of the pork produced. These regulations will cost producers millions and will result in 15% less pork produced in the same space.
 
Sort of,.. California is certainly free to dictate agricultural business inside it's state, but their reach should end at the state border,.. If they stick to their guns, do it with incentives, and their markets are desirable enough, producers that want to pursue that business will do so at their own pace.
California can dictate whatever rules, laws, and regulations within their own border so long as it doesn’t negate something federal in nature. This does none of that.

They are the richest state in America. They have more bargaining power than Iowa.

This is how things work when you don’t have the ultimate participation trophy at play. Meaning a POTUS who lost the popular vote.
 
So you try to not put money into farmer's hands?
He said nothing about farmers. He was commenting on Iowa commodities and his use.

Farmers are the ultimate welfare recipients. Farm subsidies are the raping of the American taxpayer
 
There is no dish that bacon doesn’t make better.
i-could-not-agree-more-jake-peralta.gif
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT