If Grassley can stop California from not selling Iowa Pork, can't a California senator claim Iowa should allow the sale of California marijuana?
If Grassley can stop California from not selling Iowa Pork, can't a California senator claim Iowa should allow the sale of California marijuana?
Do you want higher prices? Pretty obvious reason for anyone with common sense.Why do you care?
California is about 13% of the market, but it would cost an average producer about $3,000,000 to convert to their standards and they would lose 15% of their space for hogs. They would spend money for fewer hogs. California may have to live with less pork for a while.Pork producers unwilling to conform to the CA standards are essentially losing about 15% of the consumer market. That’s a shock to their market system for sure.
Do you want higher prices? Pretty obvious reason for anyone with common sense.
It’s precisely the point raised by kavanaugh in his dissentThat's a great point. Its commerce after all.
California is about 13% of the market, but it would cost an average producer about $3,000,000 to convert to their standards and they would lose 15% of their space for hogs. They would spend money for fewer hogs. California may have to live with less pork for a while.
New facilities will be built to comply.
They’re is a pig farmer in southern Iowa who is saying you’re a liar, glimmered. He was on TV a couple of days ago.California is about 13% of the market, but it would cost an average producer about $3,000,000 to convert to their standards and they would lose 15% of their space for hogs. They would spend money for fewer hogs. California may have to live with less pork for a while.
New facilities will be built to comply.
The numbers I used to convert were taken from an article that I no longer have, so I can't verify and they should be taken with that in mind. The math per square feet is solid though. You'll have at least 15% fewer hogs in the same space.They’re is a pig farmer in southern Iowa who is saying you’re a liar, glimmered. He was on TV a couple of days ago.
He figured after Cali passed their rules a year ago, the writing was on the wall. He made his conversion and he said it was rather inexpensive to do so. He will continue to do business in California.
Farmers love to complain for the most part. That is why they vote Republican. Real doesn’t matter if it doesn’t fit the agenda.The numbers I used to convert were taken from an article that I no longer have, so I can't verify and they should be taken with that in mind. The math per square feet is solid though. You'll have at least 15% fewer hogs in the same space.
Chuck us just following the orders the Farm Bureau gave him.Why isn't Grassley championing a grant program that reimburses some or all of the costs to update facilities? His position seems punitive in nature, with no eye to the future. There has to be a way for one of the most powerful men in Congress to leverage this situation to benefit Iowans other than hoping to purposefully circumvent the will of the voters in California forever.
How about no! Let the free market work it out. California can pay more for pork, Hog producers can figure out who they want to sell pork to.Why isn't Grassley championing a grant program that reimburses some or all of the costs to update facilities? His position seems punitive in nature, with no eye to the future. There has to be a way for one of the most powerful men in Congress to leverage this situation to benefit Iowans other than hoping to purposefully circumvent the will of the voters in California forever.
How about no! Let the free market work it out. California can pay more for pork, Hog producers can figure out who they want to sell pork to.
That this isn't standard is the issue...
The law requires that sows that give birth to pigs sold for pork in California be given at least 24 square feet of space and the ability to stand up and turn around in their cage.
That there's a problem with providing this minimal level of treatment is ridiculous. Less than a 5x5 space that a 400+ lb sow can stand up in and turn around?
Where living space is concerned, more IS better. You got one of these in your backyard?What happens when the people of California determine in their next proposition that the new threshold requirement for accommodating birthing sows is 60 square feet, powder blue walls and air conditioning?,.. More isn't always better or necessary.
Where living space is concerned, more IS better.
Then the court will determine if that is reasonable.What happens when the people of California determine in their next proposition that the new threshold requirement for accommodating birthing sows is 60 square feet, powder blue walls and air conditioning?,.. More isn't always better or necessary.
They are determining it for their own state, not a national level.But at some point more becomes unnecessary,.. and I'm not sure it's a good idea for us to allow the people of California, or any other state for that matter, to dictate topics like this on a national level.
Keep going. With a little luck, people may realize we don't actually need the Ag department.Related, SC upholds California ban on foie gras.
They are determining it for their own state, not a national level.
That's up to the distributors and the producers. They have a choice to comply and sell to CA or not. And some already are. Nevertheless this law applies only to CA.Reality will be national,.. This new proposition requires that all pork sold inside the state of California abide by these new requirements. Most pork in the US is distributed by large national firms like Smithfield, Farmland, Tyson, etc.. Faced with this new law, and the reality that it would be cost prohibitive to produce a special California compliant labeled product, these firms will very likely require all of their livestock producers comply or go elsewhere. Since livestock producers tend to operate with limited outlets for their product, the majority of these producers will be forced to give in and make the necessary improvements. End result being that the cost of satisfying California, will ultimately be borne by consumers nationwide...
They are dictating for themselves. It's like TX dictating what goes into textbooks for everyone else. Happens all the time in all kinds of areas. And this isn't a question of "more"...anyone arguing that those requirements are excessive should spend a month in a cage where they can't stand up or turn around.But at some point more becomes unnecessary,.. and I'm not sure it's a good idea for us to allow the people of California, or any other state for that matter, to dictate topics like this on a national level.
Read the “editorial” in Sunday’s Eeguster… the author offers a couple of ideas for the reason behind Cali’s new rules. Primarily the argument is this is what the people of Cali want..it has nothing to do with what Iowa pig farmers think is just.,They are determining it for their own state, not a national level.
Really? Can we replace it with the Farm Bureau then?Keep going. With a little luck, people may realize we don't actually need the Ag department.
Voila! Debt ceiling agreement reached!
She’s going to make them squeal!
Like all those subordinates she screwed in Iraq?She’s going to make them squeal!