ADVERTISEMENT

Harreld offers first message on why he came to Iowa

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,435
62,542
113
In his first public statement since shortly after being tapped as the next University of Iowa president, Bruce Harreld said he is coming to Iowa for the same reason so many others have come to the state to study, work and live.

"We are creative and collaborative, inspired by this place and its history," Harreld wrote in a message emailed Tuesday afternoon to members of the UI community. "We’re pragmatic but not afraid to think big. We value hard work, we speak forthrightly, and we honor our promises. That’s why we are Iowa."

Since his Sept. 3 selection by the Iowa Board of Regents, Harreld has been meeting privately with UI faculty members, staff, students and alumni. Although he had unanimous support among the nine-member board, various groups on and off campus have issued withering criticism against the search process that led to his hiring — and sometimes against Harreld himself.

"These early conversations have allowed me the opportunity to listen, as well as the chance to illustrate my leadership style," Harreld wrote. "Leadership requires careful listening, seeing problems through others’ eyes, and understanding that the best solutions come when we establish strong teams, exchange ideas, and work together."

In answer to questions raised during those meetings, Harreld offered the following points:

  • As a graduate of a public research institution, he believes these institutions are the foundation of our future and that — through their mission of teaching, research and service — "they promise to make our individual and collective lives better."
  • He views faculty tenure as a necessary part of "(providing) the foundation for academic freedom, (protecting) innovative research and scholarship, and (ensuring) that our students can learn from the best in their fields."
  • He views shared governance among all the campus stakeholders an important part of the institution's success — but he also cautioned that "with shared governance ... comes shared responsibility."
  • He recognizes that the university can't succeed unless it invests in its people and strengthens its core mission — even in lean times.
"I will honor our character, traditions, and legacy, enhancing our distinctive strengths in the arts and humanities," he wrote. "Iowa has built an art collection that includes treasures like Jackson Pollock’s 'Mural,' pioneering programs like the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, and an academic culture that emphasizes the role of the liberal arts in shaping students’ practical skills and perspectives on life. These form our core, and they must be protected and built upon at all costs."

Harreld also alluded to broader crises facing the university — challenges that regents have said could be addressed better by Harreld, as a former IBM executive, than by the other finalists who had decades' worth of experience in university administration.

"Higher education stands at the threshold of changes driven by increased competition, diminished federal and state funding, increased tuition, rapid technology shifts, and questions about its value," he wrote. "At Iowa, I have met people with the will to tackle these changing circumstances head-on. Our campus and community are ready to meet those challenges with creativity and commitment, and I want to help us chart our future."

Harreld's first day on the job is scheduled for Nov. 2.

A protest against his hiring is being scheduled for the regents' Oct. 21-22 meeting in Iowa City.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...fers-first-message-why-he-came-iowa/73873882/
 
Are we really to believe that despite having no Iowa roots, Herreld took the job because we have a Jackson Pollack and he's impressed with how forthright we are?
 
In his first public statement since shortly after being tapped as the next University of Iowa president, Bruce Harreld said he is coming to Iowa for the same reason so many others have come to the state to study, work and live.

"We are creative and collaborative, inspired by this place and its history," Harreld wrote in a message emailed Tuesday afternoon to members of the UI community. "We’re pragmatic but not afraid to think big. We value hard work, we speak forthrightly, and we honor our promises. That’s why we are Iowa."

Since his Sept. 3 selection by the Iowa Board of Regents, Harreld has been meeting privately with UI faculty members, staff, students and alumni. Although he had unanimous support among the nine-member board, various groups on and off campus have issued withering criticism against the search process that led to his hiring — and sometimes against Harreld himself.

"These early conversations have allowed me the opportunity to listen, as well as the chance to illustrate my leadership style," Harreld wrote. "Leadership requires careful listening, seeing problems through others’ eyes, and understanding that the best solutions come when we establish strong teams, exchange ideas, and work together."

In answer to questions raised during those meetings, Harreld offered the following points:

  • As a graduate of a public research institution, he believes these institutions are the foundation of our future and that — through their mission of teaching, research and service — "they promise to make our individual and collective lives better."
  • He views faculty tenure as a necessary part of "(providing) the foundation for academic freedom, (protecting) innovative research and scholarship, and (ensuring) that our students can learn from the best in their fields."
  • He views shared governance among all the campus stakeholders an important part of the institution's success — but he also cautioned that "with shared governance ... comes shared responsibility."
  • He recognizes that the university can't succeed unless it invests in its people and strengthens its core mission — even in lean times.
"I will honor our character, traditions, and legacy, enhancing our distinctive strengths in the arts and humanities," he wrote. "Iowa has built an art collection that includes treasures like Jackson Pollock’s 'Mural,' pioneering programs like the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, and an academic culture that emphasizes the role of the liberal arts in shaping students’ practical skills and perspectives on life. These form our core, and they must be protected and built upon at all costs."

Harreld also alluded to broader crises facing the university — challenges that regents have said could be addressed better by Harreld, as a former IBM executive, than by the other finalists who had decades' worth of experience in university administration.

"Higher education stands at the threshold of changes driven by increased competition, diminished federal and state funding, increased tuition, rapid technology shifts, and questions about its value," he wrote. "At Iowa, I have met people with the will to tackle these changing circumstances head-on. Our campus and community are ready to meet those challenges with creativity and commitment, and I want to help us chart our future."

Harreld's first day on the job is scheduled for Nov. 2.

A protest against his hiring is being scheduled for the regents' Oct. 21-22 meeting in Iowa City.

http://www.press-citizen.com/story/...fers-first-message-why-he-came-iowa/73873882/
You beat me to the punch. I just got this in an email.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd Lickliter
At this point in the process I would feel a whole lot more comfortable with his hire if Bruce actually put for details of how he intends to improve the University rather than just giving us generalized statements of how great Iowa is. Makes me wonder if he has any specific plans at all?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menace Sockeyes
At this point in the process I would feel a whole lot more comfortable with his hire if Bruce actually put for details of how he intends to improve the University rather than just giving us generalized statements of how great Iowa is. Makes me wonder if he has any specific plans at all?
He still hasn't responded to my Facebook friend request :D
 
He still hasn't responded to my Facebook friend request :D
Beyond generic statements, he has responded to much of anything else. Kind of throws this statement out the window:

"I’ve heard plenty of misconceptions about my vision and values, so let me suggest this: If you hear something that worries you, simply ask me directly. I’ll give you an honest answer."
 
At this point in the process I would feel a whole lot more comfortable with his hire if Bruce actually put for details of how he intends to improve the University rather than just giving us generalized statements of how great Iowa is. Makes me wonder if he has any specific plans at all?

Have past U of I Presidents done this in detail?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Todd Lickliter
I went from the "we'll wait and see" column to the "skeptical" column after a conversation with a U of I donor and one high up within a large Eastern Iowa corporation. He told me Harreld basically stumbled his way through the Q & A he attended, offering little to nothing in terms of vision. Furthermore, Harreld has never been a CEO so he has zero experience in matters such as dealing with payrolls, pensions, health care, and other HR matters a CEO would have. While his record in corporate America is pretty good, this donor had major reservations that Harreld had the expertise and requisite skills for the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
enlighten me
OK, so you are asked to participate in a search process for a member of the administration of your workplace. You are told that your input is valued. You spend countless hours selecting and interviewing candidates. You are told that one candidate is required to be a finalist by your board of directors. You make recommendations to the board. In response, the board hires the least qualified candidate who has zero relevant experience and lies on his resume. It appears that the reason he has been hired is to throw a relatively well functioning institution into turmoil. It turns out that the entire process was rigged from the beginning with the preferred candidate getting preferential treatment.

Would you be just the slightest bit bitter at being asked to participate in the open and honest process.
 
OK, so you are asked to participate in a search process for a member of the administration of your workplace. You are told that your input is valued. You spend countless hours selecting and interviewing candidates. You are told that one candidate is required to be a finalist by your board of directors. You make recommendations to the board. In response, the board hires the least qualified candidate who has zero relevant experience and lies on his resume. It appears that the reason he has been hired is to throw a relatively well functioning institution into turmoil. It turns out that the entire process was rigged from the beginning with the preferred candidate getting preferential treatment.

Would you be just the slightest bit bitter at being asked to participate in the open and honest process.
You make fair points, but what was the whining supposed to accomplish? The decision makers made their decision. But who decides who is most qualified?

I have no horse in the race, it just seems like they made a choice that was not status quo and some people could not accept this. For all anyone knows, the new president could do an outstanding job. And some of the "more qualified" applicants could have been awful
 
OK, so you are asked to participate in a search process for a member of the administration of your workplace. You are told that your input is valued. You spend countless hours selecting and interviewing candidates. You are told that one candidate is required to be a finalist by your board of directors. You make recommendations to the board. In response, the board hires the least qualified candidate who has zero relevant experience and lies on his resume. It appears that the reason he has been hired is to throw a relatively well functioning institution into turmoil. It turns out that the entire process was rigged from the beginning with the preferred candidate getting preferential treatment.

Would you be just the slightest bit bitter at being asked to participate in the open and honest process.

So if the hospital execs like the guy, and the academics don't like the guy, whose vote matters most?
 
I went from the "we'll wait and see" column to the "skeptical" column after a conversation with a U of I donor and one high up within a large Eastern Iowa corporation. He told me Harreld basically stumbled his way through the Q & A he attended, offering little to nothing in terms of vision. Furthermore, Harreld has never been a CEO so he has zero experience in matters such as dealing with payrolls, pensions, health care, and other HR matters a CEO would have. While his record in corporate America is pretty good, this donor had major reservations that Harreld had the expertise and requisite skills for the job.

Lol. Nobody can understand these matters unless you were a CEO?

Cmon bro
 
Are we really to believe that despite having no Iowa roots, Herreld took the job because we have a Jackson Pollack and he's impressed with how forthright we are?
I'm sort of glad he mentioned the Pollack as I had been worried he might be the sort who would want to sell it to raise money for some research lab. I feel better already. Now if he will give us top notch tailgating and some first rate musical theater touring stops at the new theater, I'll be happy.
 
At this point in the process I would feel a whole lot more comfortable with his hire if Bruce actually put for details of how he intends to improve the University rather than just giving us generalized statements of how great Iowa is. Makes me wonder if he has any specific plans at all?
TB's hire, just a born politician.
 
I went from the "we'll wait and see" column to the "skeptical" column after a conversation with a U of I donor and one high up within a large Eastern Iowa corporation. He told me Harreld basically stumbled his way through the Q & A he attended, offering little to nothing in terms of vision. Furthermore, Harreld has never been a CEO so he has zero experience in matters such as dealing with payrolls, pensions, health care, and other HR matters a CEO would have. While his record in corporate America is pretty good, this donor had major reservations that Harreld had the expertise and requisite skills for the job.

It will be very interesting to see what happens to fundraising at UI following this hire.
 
At this point in the process I would feel a whole lot more comfortable with his hire if Bruce actually put for details of how he intends to improve the University rather than just giving us generalized statements of how great Iowa is. Makes me wonder if he has any specific plans at all?
He had been here a few weeks and you want a detailed plan? Give him some time, we will see his vision.
 
It seems like the new guy is trying his best to build bridges so an effective relationship between himself and the academic faculty can forged HOWEVER it doesn't seem like the other side even wants to try to meet him even half way to make the relationship work. Does the faculty really think they are going to change a decision that the regents made unanimously for their guy?

No one knows yet...this guy might be the greatest President the university has ever had but that can't happen without the faculty at the very least hearing the guy out and letting him lead as he has been hired to.
 
HE DIDN'T MENTION ATHLETICS OR MORE SPECIFICALLY FOOTBALL


GET RID OF HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Then you don't know nearly enough to offer a constructive critique of the situation.

That is probably true but what does the constant defiance accomplish at this point in the game? The guy isn't going to be unhired at this point so both sides should start out now with a clean slate to make the best of a rocky start.
 
How did most of his peers get their "training" on these matters bro?
Most of his peers have been involved in academics and/or large public institutions at sometime in their resume.....THat's how one "trains" for such a position.....
Look Todd, I wish the guy all the luck in the world..after all he is President of a school I care a lot about.....I just think that those responsible for the decision could have been a little bit more honest in their endeavor. The BoR and Branstad flat-assed lied to the people of Iowa and the faculty and staff of the U of Iowa. For what reason? We will never be told. That is BS.
 
That is probably true but what does the constant defiance accomplish at this point in the game? The guy isn't going to be unhired at this point so both sides should start out now with a clean slate to make the best of a rocky start.

True....but as Desi told Lucy....."You got some 'splaining to do!"
Whatever problems Branstad and the BoR (and the state GOP) thought existed at Iowa City have certainly NOT been resolved by their actions in appointing a President there. I feel sorry for Harreld. He is in a sticky situation, which really is not his doing.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT