Hillary is saying Tulsi is being groomed by the Russians
- Thread starter BrunoMars420
- Start date
Look, our intelligence knew about Trump and Russia before the 2016 election. It's not unfathomable that if Tulsi is either working with or being used by Russia that the CIA/FBI would know about it.
She's taken Russian money and her rhetoric has been favorably to Russian interests. Why do you think so many are saying this when she's not a player for POTUS?
Yeah... if she decides to embark on an independent/3rd party campaign, she's going to find that it's not worth the trouble. Ron Paul can offer some advice on how American Politics, and this Demo-Publican duopoly have hamstrung the system to where you have to operate within their corrupt system in order to get anywhere. She's young and more idealistic, perhaps. But, a Russian flunkie? Puh-leeze! If people can buy that, then I know why they believe that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't the lone killer.
Damn... this is amazing. People who I thought were rational on this board can turn on a dime. Sheezus!
Pretty soon, anyone that supports Tulsi will get thrown into the basket of deplorables these muffin tops speaks so much about.
This country is royally fvcked! If you objectively read this woman's platform, policies and what she wants for the country, I don't know how you can be opposed to her. She's also an American veteran, and currently IN the National Guard. And, yet... somehow... people have chosen to ignore that and, instead, believe that she MUST BE a Russian plant!
Is she a Russian spy? No. But I would be incredibly surprised if Russia didn't have a wish list of candidates to manipulate and that she wasn't on the top for the Dems.
We would be complete morons to not believe that Russia wasn't targeting candidates after 2016 and Trump.
Who cares who they want. It matters who we want. If Tulsi would be the person for America, that's fine with me. She's not going to win, but she'd have my support.
I've listened to several 1-2 hr podcasts and listened to her in depth views and platform. She is the real deal as far as I'm concerned. Maybe people will begin to see that down the road, but this election cycle, it's not going to happen for her.
The Russians successfully hijacked 2016 so they can do it again. At this point, we don't have the luxury of assuming that none of our candidates are compromised.
Picking out the candidate who is most likely to have been gotten to is reasonable to me
Yeah bc the only reason someone who realizes the entire process is BS and runs 3rd party is bc they're Russian assets...
GD people are stupid. And Hillary needs to be put out to pasture asap. She just can't stand not being relevant.
A partisan-hack disciple, like you? I have no doubt that "incredibly surprised" is grossly understated.
Damn, man... you are as deluded as OiT. You're like wacky, political bookends! Congratulations!
At this point, denying that Russia targets our candidates only proves that you are the partisan one. Every last intelligence agency we has says that they do.
Can I ask you to answer this without the emotion? What makes her special? Ok, she's a vet, but she's not the only one. She's a non-interventionist. Not the only one.
I've seen her at the debates, she hasn't been impressive. So tell me, what makes her special? Special enough to look past the questionable decisions she's been making like the video from PV on Fox?
Wait. Are you serious? Do you really think, despite everything we know about 2016, that the Russians weren't targeting our election?
I don't, but I blame the candidate if they take the bait. That's where the jury is still out with Tulsi. If she plays spoiler, it's a pretty good sign that she is compromised. We'll have to see what happens with that.
You're missing the point... as usual. I'm sure that whatever power structure that exists in Russian government was certainly going to try and do whatever it could to have a favorable outcome. The exact same thing the United States power brokers do, all the time, in every foreign election. You're so deluded, Trump-struck, and paranoid, that you'll be suspicious of anyone if the "Democrat Leaders" tell you to beware of the candidate that prefers peaceful diplomacy to dropping bombs.
Not based on his replies to my posts. Either he isn't reading them or he disagrees with the idea of the Russians picking candidates to manipulate.
None of the other candidates are pro-peace on the level of Gabbard. Not Bernie, not Warren... none of them. I distrust where the big-money brokers place their wagers, not "Russia." This whole "Russia" fear is becoming a joke. Some of you act like it's 1959, not 2019.
So you agree with me that the Russians are targeting our candidates then. Why the handwringing then?
Also why should we be ok with foreign influence over our elections?
Look, I don't know one way or another. I'm just putting it out there that many people believe this. Why?
Similar threads
