What are you talking about? I never said anything about voter IDs, just that Trump is an idiot who would gladly commit fraud to rig an election.So why does the right push for these laws then? The left shouldn’t be pushing against this if everything else in life requires an ID. It should be a simple concept. You are brainwashed.
Well, somebody here is…So why does the right push for these laws then? The left shouldn’t be pushing against this if everything else in life requires an ID. It should be a simple concept. You are brainwashed.
You miss d the biggest one, the majority of fraud is done by guess it, Republican voters.What funny is the Heritage Foundation is trying to make it look like they’ve uncovered tons of fraud. And what you have is about 100 cases a year across the entire country, many related to local elections. And of those cases, here are some things that strike me.
Make no mistake; the GOP is using absurd and fictional claims of massive voter fraud as cover to pass sweeping laws aimed at disenfranchising voters. This is indisputable. Some of the faithful are no doubt completely duped by their “leadership”, but they are just swallowing the lies they’ve been told.
- Almost all of them are one or two fraudulent ballots, never any significant numbers like people like Elon want you to believe.
- Almost none of them would have been prevented by ID laws.
One lady in Iowa even said she was concerned the vote was “rigged” against Trump so she voted twice to try to make up for it. 1000 IQ move!You miss d the biggest one, the majority of fraud is done by guess it, Republican voters.
It's reasonable to think the number of actual voter fraud cases is higher. What do you suggest the ratio would be?LOL - That only represents those who were caught, not the other 12 million who got away with it.
Yup. No one has ever said voter fraud doesn’t happen. What most of us try to argue is that first of all , there a numerous guardrails in place to validate elections. Second, to accomplish voter fraud on the scale large enough to actually impact elections, you’re talking a group large enough that it’s highly unlikely at best they wouldn’t get noticed.It happens. It’s extremely rare.
Don’t believe anything you read on Twitter. Voting fraud isn’t even a fraction the problem that voter suppression is.
Here is a database put together by an extremely right wing group, the hertiage foundation, that tracks voter fraud. Take a look around and you’ll see just how small of a deal it is.
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map
The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map is an interactive tool providing a sampling of proven instances of election fraud across the U.S. From @HeritageDatavizwww.heritage.org
Feel free to provide any evidence.LOL - That only represents those who were caught, not the other 12 million who got away with it.
So why does the right push for these laws then? The left shouldn’t be pushing against this if everything else in life requires an ID. It should be a simple concept. You are brainwashed.
If the MAGA folks had the ability to think critically they would most likely be in a life position that meant they weren’t so aggrieved. They certainly would not vote for Trump.I find it amazing that grown up adults in this thread - even after the myriad of challenges to the 2020 election came up with absolutely nothing that would have turned not one single race - believe some sort of massive fraud occurred.
Those very same posters then brush aside all the attempts at disenfranchising said voters, which was 100% verified to occur, and those people were held accountable for that in court.
That kind of stupidity defies explanation really...
L O LOnly reasonable explanation as to how Trump can get so many votes.
NoIf the MAGA folks had the ability to think critically they would most likely be in a life position that meant they weren’t so aggrieved. They certainly would not vote for Trump.
The Trump chapter of the American experience is, if nothing else, a great filter for who is logical and who is not.
How about we use voter ID like every other civilization?
So why does the right push for these laws then? The left shouldn’t be pushing against this if everything else in life requires an ID. It should be a simple concept. You are brainwashed.
Primaries are not elections.
Which is why the process for voting in them is different from elections, which is why your comment makes no sense.Yes,.. that would be why they have a different name...
Which is why the process for voting in them is different from elections, which is why your comment makes no sense.
It makes sense…to a problem that doesn’t exist.A federal voting ID makes perfect sense,.. We can disagree as to how many ways it might be utilized, but it makes perfect sense.
I don’t know if “significant” fraud is necessary to sway this supposed close election? I’ll leave it to others to explain how fraud can occur, but even a small amount is too much, in my opinion.And to expand the topic slightly, are there other forms of fraud beyond the ID issue that people have?
For instance I see people joke about tons of dead people voting for Democrats (and the DeNiro movie The Irishman even has a scene about the mob getting Kennedy elected with ballot stuffing) but I assume this would have been the first thing Trump’s team searched for in the last election and to my knowledge they didn’t find anything.
Another scenario I could imagine is somehow messing with the mail-in ballots if you could for instance buy off the staff at the post office.
What other scenarios am I missing?
As long as humans are involved, small amounts of fraud are all but impossible to prevent entirely. What fraud has been found in previous elections has been statistically insignificant amount…last election we’re literally talking a handful of votes on average per state. Significant fraud would require thousands of cases of voter fraud, likely in more than 1 state.I
I don’t know if “significant” fraud is necessary to sway this supposed close election? I’ll leave it to others to explain how fraud can occur, but even a small amount is too much, in my opinion.
Are you against requiring IDs to vote? If so, why?MAGA logic folks
Counterpoint: what instances of voter fraud would it have prevented?Are you against requiring IDs to vote? If so, why?
No
See this is what I’m talking about. You have no compelling argument. Y’all just twist yourselves into a pretzel to justify a vote for a conman grifter who isn’t helping our country one bit.
Banks have vaults,.. Not because bank robbery is particularly rampant, but rather because it provides customers with a level of confidence in the security of their accounts,... That's why we need voter ID,.. Voter confidence.
If voting is important enough to folks they will make it a priority, they will do what their state requires. Enough of this voter suppression crap.
Out of curiously what happened to her?One lady in Iowa even said she was concerned the vote was “rigged” against Trump so she voted twice to try to make up for it. 1000 IQ move!
Right, you know the deal, you either do it, or don't. And you eloquently and beautifully stated "just to cast a ballot".Ok so you go stand in line for 6 hours to vote and tell me that you would never ask the question if it was all really worth it.
It's easy for you to say that when voting for you is easy and you are in and out in 15 minutes. A lot harder to say that if you stand in line for nearly half your waking hours just to cast a ballot.
So you are against all safeguards in life?It makes sense…to a problem that doesn’t exist.
That’s a strange leap in logic.So you are against all safeguards in life?
Just answer the question Yes or No -That’s a strange leap in logic.
Just about every law and regulation and safeguard we have in place is in reaction to an observable problem.
We don’t really do very well trying to fix things that aren’t broken.
LOL...banks have vaults to protect literally millions of dollars and the safety deposit boxes of their customers. Bank robberies are probably more common than in-person voter fraud where the person is actually voting as someone else. The W DOJ investigated for five years...it was the primary focus of the DOJ for that entire time...federal prosecutors were fired for refusing to waste resources to go down that dead end. Final Tally, they obtained fewer than 70 convictions, and not one of them would have been prevented by voter ID. Not one.Banks have vaults,.. Not because bank robbery is particularly rampant, but rather because it provides customers with a level of confidence in the security of their accounts,... That's why we need voter ID,.. Voter confidence.
What problem would it solve?Just answer the question Yes or No -
Are for or against some type of Voter ID law