¿Por que no los dos? Why pick one or the other.Talent eval is not the issue here duder.
Cael rarely misses because his coaching/training system works extremely well. Tom lacks consistency because his coaching/training system doesn't work as well as Cael's.
This is easily shown in examples such as Ayala beats Davis in the dual and Davis wins Big Tens or Rathjen beats Kasak in the dual and Kasak outplaces him at Big Tens or Woods owned Bartlett in the past and now Bartlett seems to have surpassed him or Kemmerer went from beating Starocci to getting surpassed by him or why the same happened with Eierman and Lee, etc., etc., etc.
I don't understand why it's so hard for so many on this board to see this or admit this or whatever, but it's staring us in the face with this common theme repeated and recycled again and again and again.
And, it's a self-licking icecream cone. The system develops the current wrestlers, which builds a positive track record. Kids see the post season results that Penn State has, which results in better recruits. Having the pick of the litter in recruiting results in more, better kids that better fit the Penn State system. So the level just keeps on getting higher and higher, resulting in recruiting classes like you see with the 2024 and 2025 classes. Used to be that way for Iowa, too.
Iowa and Penn State have very different approaches, which is a surprise to absolutely no one. Maybe the "Iowa style" of wrestling will come back into vogue, but I doubt it. I'll pick an example of one glaring difference between the two programs: far ankle defense. There are a couple of guys on Iowa who do it, but the only one in recent memory who did it very well was Eierman, who spent four years at Mizzou before transferring. Meanwhile, Penn State has a half dozen current starters who will regularly convert an opponent's shot into their own offense.