There's some scary questions in there around immigration and around security that I bet most on this board got incorrect.
That would probably make a good thread topic.There's some scary questions in there around immigration and around security that I bet most on this board got incorrect.
Incorrect as in different than your opinion?There's some scary questions in there around immigration and around security that I bet most on this board got incorrect.
Marco Rubio - 94%
Ted Cruz - 91%
Donald Trump - 91%
Jeb Bush - 89%
Ben Carson - 87%
It doesn't really surprise me. I thought I would probably vote Rubio to begin with, if I did vote (which I won't). Donald is saying all the right things, but I don't believe a word he says.
Do we all get the same questions? I don't recall GW even being on my survey.Fun link. Not exactly scientific. Example, it starts out working from the assumption that global warming isn't a theory. It kinda felt like a DNC research op. In the FAQ the founders don't reveal their own political bias. One claims to be a lifelong "undecided voter". The other one claims to be a political analyst. I'm not sure those credentials convey gravitas. Anyway, it was fun, but probably exists to serve a political agenda. Wittingly or unwittingly.
Do we all get the same questions? I don't recall GW even being on my survey.
I got one question about regulating industry more to protect the environment, but I think that was it.Good question.
I got one question about regulating industry more to protect the environment, but I think that was it.
Three initial questions on the environment. Three more if you expand the topic.I got one question about regulating industry more to protect the environment, but I think that was it.
The hawks are about to play, I'm drinking.Apparently your recall mechanism has a short circuit.