Interesting question posed by the OP.
Depends on how you value contributions from a set of immigrants vs harm from a set of immigrants.
I speak of "sets" here because we ought to possess the analytical resolution needed to decipher between sets of immigrants with distinctive enough properties that you might be able to logically group them by said properties.
(these attributes including but not limited to items like region,religion,gender,race,education,criminal history -- anything telling)
Do the contributions from X set of immigrants more than offset the harms from X set of immigrants?
That's a fair question to ask, and you're going to get a lot of different answers. While we ought to appeal to analytics to inform us, they cannot answer the question.
How much "good" introduced by set X is enough to offset necessary (they're humans) harm? How much good to offset 300 new murders? I don't know. I do know I'd like to see lots more data.
This ends up being a very utilitarian question.
Also, on illegal immigration:
Saying that an illegal immigrant shouldn't have been here in the first place (to commit a murder) is essentially a "truism" and isn't too interesting.
Depends on how you value contributions from a set of immigrants vs harm from a set of immigrants.
I speak of "sets" here because we ought to possess the analytical resolution needed to decipher between sets of immigrants with distinctive enough properties that you might be able to logically group them by said properties.
(these attributes including but not limited to items like region,religion,gender,race,education,criminal history -- anything telling)
Do the contributions from X set of immigrants more than offset the harms from X set of immigrants?
That's a fair question to ask, and you're going to get a lot of different answers. While we ought to appeal to analytics to inform us, they cannot answer the question.
How much "good" introduced by set X is enough to offset necessary (they're humans) harm? How much good to offset 300 new murders? I don't know. I do know I'd like to see lots more data.
This ends up being a very utilitarian question.
Also, on illegal immigration:
Saying that an illegal immigrant shouldn't have been here in the first place (to commit a murder) is essentially a "truism" and isn't too interesting.