ADVERTISEMENT

Impossible Dream Realized: Media Falls Below Congress in Trust Survey

seminole97

HB Legend
Jun 14, 2005
28,526
29,128
113

Gallup's annual confidence survey shows 69% of Americans will not relieve themselves on a journalist in flames​


The just-released results from Gallup’s Trust in Media Survey leave no doubt that members of my profession are officially America’s lowest life form. Gallup asked:

In general, how much trust and confidence do you have in the mass media — such as newspapers, T.V. and radio — when it comes to reporting the news fully, accurately, and fairly — a great deal, a fair amount, not very much, or none at all?

  • A great deal 8
  • Fair amount 23
  • Not very much 33
  • None at all 36
The Great Deal/Fair Amount number of 31% roughly ties* Gallup’s lowest-ever number, first recorded in 2016. The more shocking result is the combined Not much (33%) and None at all (36!) number of 69%. That is four points worse than the 65% figure posted by the usual standard-setter for mistrust: “The legislative branch, consisting of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.” It’s really not that close, as most distrust of Congress is of the softer, “Not very much” variety (46%), while the press laps elected counterparts by 17 points (36%-19%) in the far more hardcore None at all category.

It’s impossible to overstate this embarrassment. There are necrophiliacs who wouldn’t touch a congressional corpse. You may not hesitate to sacrifice a congressman in a lifeboat, but you think twice about eating him, even starving. Record fines for misconduct, and more informational access to behaviors like legal insider trading mean the elected officials Twain called America’s only “distinctly native criminal class” are hated more than ever. Yet expectations for journalists are now lower than those for Congress. Asked about trust in a politician, “None at all” is what people say when they expect nothing to get done. With media, it’s what you say if you don’t even trust a reporter to tell the time. It’s an extraordinary indictment.

The new horror show figures are driven by a 16% drop among Democrats over the last two years. That’s important because press watchdogs for years blew off low survey results, saying they were artificially weighted because “being ‘anti-media’ is part of [Republicans’] political identity,” as FiveThirtyEight once put it. That was back when most corporate media companies were proudly in the doling-shit-out business. Now they’re eating it.
 
Yeah, that darn 90% liberal media just can't handle the other 10% of free speech. Just let Hillary get in there to get full control.
Do you have a clue what you spout on here? I didn't think so. Like I said in another post, recent roadkill is your best hope.
 
Do you have a clue what you spout on here? I didn't think so. Like I said in another post, recent roadkill is your best hope.
Yes actually I do. If you want to take off your blue glasses there are about a thousand studies about the media and their bias. I know you don't want to hear it, but it doesn't make them any less true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scotihawk
Would be interested in the confidence level these same folks would ascribe to social media posts (that are selected for them).
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
We literally just had a Sunday Show anchor on one of the three major networks argue that it's perfectly acceptable that only a handful of apartment complexes have been taken over by deadly Venezuelan gangs. Totally trustworthy.
 
More evidence of media bias (in addition to paying 3/4ths of a billion) - Fox helped write Trump’s speech and then interviewed him this morning on how great his speech was - usual suspects would have a thrombo if this was CBS.

I suspect we won’t see them on this issue …

 
  • Wow
Reactions: TheCainer
Yes actually I do. If you want to take off your blue glasses there are about a thousand studies about the media and their bias. I know you don't want to hear it, but it doesn't make them any less true.
Some of the media has biases, but it appears the right wing media will just out and out lie. And the worst part of it is you believe them.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ICHerky
Kamalas water is equally heavy but it has more carriers...

LOL

Fox
OAN
WSJ
The Blaze
Breitbart
Hannity
Washington Times
NY Post
Epoch Times
The American Spectator
Daily Wire
Federalist
National Review
Newsmax
Washington Free Beacon
Real Clear Politics
Reason
Franklin Graham
Ben Shapiro
Charlie Kirk
Red State
RT
Town Hall
Gateway Pundit
Michelle Malkin …

were all unavailable for comment.
 

Gallup's annual confidence survey shows 69% of Americans will not relieve themselves on a journalist in flames​


The just-released results from Gallup’s Trust in Media Survey leave no doubt that members of my profession are officially America’s lowest life form. Gallup asked:

In general, how much trust and confidence do you have in the mass media — such as newspapers, T.V. and radio — when it comes to reporting the news fully, accurately, and fairly — a great deal, a fair amount, not very much, or none at all?


  • A great deal 8
  • Fair amount 23
  • Not very much 33
  • None at all 36
The Great Deal/Fair Amount number of 31% roughly ties* Gallup’s lowest-ever number, first recorded in 2016. The more shocking result is the combined Not much (33%) and None at all (36!) number of 69%. That is four points worse than the 65% figure posted by the usual standard-setter for mistrust: “The legislative branch, consisting of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.” It’s really not that close, as most distrust of Congress is of the softer, “Not very much” variety (46%), while the press laps elected counterparts by 17 points (36%-19%) in the far more hardcore None at all category.

It’s impossible to overstate this embarrassment. There are necrophiliacs who wouldn’t touch a congressional corpse. You may not hesitate to sacrifice a congressman in a lifeboat, but you think twice about eating him, even starving. Record fines for misconduct, and more informational access to behaviors like legal insider trading mean the elected officials Twain called America’s only “distinctly native criminal class” are hated more than ever. Yet expectations for journalists are now lower than those for Congress. Asked about trust in a politician, “None at all” is what people say when they expect nothing to get done. With media, it’s what you say if you don’t even trust a reporter to tell the time. It’s an extraordinary indictment.

The new horror show figures are driven by a 16% drop among Democrats over the last two years. That’s important because press watchdogs for years blew off low survey results, saying they were artificially weighted because “being ‘anti-media’ is part of [Republicans’] political identity,” as FiveThirtyEight once put it. That was back when most corporate media companies were proudly in the doling-shit-out business. Now they’re eating it.
Authoritarianism is hard work. One of the tenets...build distrust in the media. The radical right is making it happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheCainer
Yeah, that darn 90% liberal media just can't handle the other 10% of free speech. Just let Hillary get in there to get full control.
You're making the point....you've been duped. You believe what the far right, that is only peddling lies to sow your distrust, has been telling you.



The second article is what Trump threatens pretty consistently now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheCainer

Gallup's annual confidence survey shows 69% of Americans will not relieve themselves on a journalist in flames​


The just-released results from Gallup’s Trust in Media Survey leave no doubt that members of my profession are officially America’s lowest life form. Gallup asked:

In general, how much trust and confidence do you have in the mass media — such as newspapers, T.V. and radio — when it comes to reporting the news fully, accurately, and fairly — a great deal, a fair amount, not very much, or none at all?


  • A great deal 8
  • Fair amount 23
  • Not very much 33
  • None at all 36
The Great Deal/Fair Amount number of 31% roughly ties* Gallup’s lowest-ever number, first recorded in 2016. The more shocking result is the combined Not much (33%) and None at all (36!) number of 69%. That is four points worse than the 65% figure posted by the usual standard-setter for mistrust: “The legislative branch, consisting of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.” It’s really not that close, as most distrust of Congress is of the softer, “Not very much” variety (46%), while the press laps elected counterparts by 17 points (36%-19%) in the far more hardcore None at all category.

It’s impossible to overstate this embarrassment. There are necrophiliacs who wouldn’t touch a congressional corpse. You may not hesitate to sacrifice a congressman in a lifeboat, but you think twice about eating him, even starving. Record fines for misconduct, and more informational access to behaviors like legal insider trading mean the elected officials Twain called America’s only “distinctly native criminal class” are hated more than ever. Yet expectations for journalists are now lower than those for Congress. Asked about trust in a politician, “None at all” is what people say when they expect nothing to get done. With media, it’s what you say if you don’t even trust a reporter to tell the time. It’s an extraordinary indictment.

The new horror show figures are driven by a 16% drop among Democrats over the last two years. That’s important because press watchdogs for years blew off low survey results, saying they were artificially weighted because “being ‘anti-media’ is part of [Republicans’] political identity,” as FiveThirtyEight once put it. That was back when most corporate media companies were proudly in the doling-shit-out business. Now they’re eating it.
Why wouldn’t “media” be at the bottom if the list? All these inter-web sights blowing smoke up folks ass 24/7…. There are by percentage very few “news sights” that can be trusted as factual. At least most Americans know they are having smoke blown up their collective ass.
 
How many editorial departments of a major American news channels or publications do you trust to "follow the news" and not omit or slant stories based on a political or social agendas of said publications?
Why don't you list them all for us and we will tell you. FWIW, there is on outlet, most likely the one where you get your information, that has a 787 million dollar judgement against them for out and out lying. Slanted, biased? Give me a break.
 
More evidence of media bias (in addition to paying 3/4ths of a billion) - Fox helped write Trump’s speech and then interviewed him this morning on how great his speech was - usual suspects would have a thrombo if this was CBS.

I suspect we won’t see them on this issue …

Sure beats the crap out of the pathetic skit that Molly Shannon put on for Cumala....
 
Every member of the media should be required to disclose their voter registration record AND to have neutral observers record their votes in every election.

While I often say that voting is a private matter, it's much different when it comes to the media. Transparency is key given the importance of their job and the impact they have on the citizenry.
 
segundo-sol-novela.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: seminole97
Why don't you list them all for us and we will tell you. FWIW, there is on outlet, most likely the one where you get your information, that has a 787 million dollar judgement against them for out and out lying. Slanted, biased? Give me a break.
I am completely shocked that you forgot to mention the $5.7 Billion ABC had to hand over in a defamation case and all those multi million dollar settlements by NBC, CNN and WaPo when they lied and shit all over a high school kid at a pro life rally? Wait...it's probably that the places you get your info from never mentioned all of those. LOL. What a joke.

How many are needed to be dishonest for the overall medium to be deemed "not trustworthy" to you? I just named 4 of the top 7 along with FOX. That's 5 of the top 7. Tell me more about how everyone should just lap up everything all of them besides FOX say. You were probably all fired up when they all reported about the border guards "whipping Hatians", weren't you?
 
Every member of the media should be required to disclose their voter registration record AND to have neutral observers record their votes in every election.

While I often say that voting is a private matter, it's much different when it comes to the media. Transparency is key given the importance of their job and the impact they have on the citizenry.

Totally bonkers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IANDFAN
Every member of the media should be required to disclose their voter registration record AND to have neutral observers record their votes in every election.

While I often say that voting is a private matter, it's much different when it comes to the media. Transparency is key given the importance of their job and the impact they have on the citizenry.
Would that go for every X and Facebook contributor? Because from what I observe it seems most Americans get their “news” from social media.

The fact is that the MSM is going to provide factual information even if there is a bias depending on the outlet. But we have become a nation of dipshits who believe everything they read on social media but distrust anything that comes from traditional media sources; the ones that still fact-check and edit their stories before presenting them for consumption.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheCainer
I believe in this day and age most people really are not interested in unbiased media, I believe they tend to look for bias confirmation.
Sadly true. When I was growing up people chose their news channel based on their favorite sports personality or cooky weatherman. Now they choose it based on how much truth they can avoid hearing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scott559
I am completely shocked that you forgot to mention the $5.7 Billion ABC had to hand over in a defamation case and all those multi million dollar settlements by NBC, CNN and WaPo when they lied and shit all over a high school kid at a pro life rally? Wait...it's probably that the places you get your info from never mentioned all of those. LOL. What a joke.

How many are needed to be dishonest for the overall medium to be deemed "not trustworthy" to you? I just named 4 of the top 7 along with FOX. That's 5 of the top 7. Tell me more about how everyone should just lap up everything all of them besides FOX say. You were probably all fired up when they all reported about the border guards "whipping Hatians", weren't you?
False equivalency king is at it again. Fox and Rush did so much damage to this country. CBS hasn't. NBC hasn't. ABC hasn't.
 
Their lawyers say they are an entertainment channel, not news. But you already know that.
Great. So why are they being included in this thread by every dope bringing them up? Weird how you didn't reply with that to any of those posts. Wait...not weird. Expected.
 
False equivalency king is at it again. Fox and Rush did so much damage to this country. CBS hasn't. NBC hasn't. ABC hasn't.
You just said FOX is entertainment. Make up your mind. We are only talking about the media here.
 
So, you trust FOX?
I trust CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC far more than FOX. MSNBC, FOX are the thing opposite sides..way too many”celebrity wannabe” talking heads to be believable. That phuquin’ “Ingraham Angle” is more off the wall than Maddie ever thought of being…. And “The Five” might be the most farciful talking head show ever shown on network TV! What a phuquin’ joke!
 
I am completely shocked that you forgot to mention the $5.7 Billion ABC had to hand over in a defamation case and all those multi million dollar settlements by NBC, CNN and WaPo when they lied and shit all over a high school kid at a pro life rally?

Good grief. Link to ABC paying 5.7 billion?

Link to any settlement over 1 million on any of the other 3?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
The fact is that the MSM is going to provide factual information even if there is a bias depending on the outlet. But we have become a nation of dipshits who believe everything they read on social media but distrust anything that comes from traditional media sources; the ones that still fact-check and edit their stories before presenting them for consumption.

Not all the time Art.

And when an outlet decides to air predominantly negative coverage for one candidiate while airing flowery stories for the other, it adds to the distrust.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT