Yah but it's the most recent trip West. OMG we lost those other game 8-10 years ago so they must be a factor.
Iowa at UCLA. Hawks -6.5 o/u 45.5 as of 4:30 GAMEDAY According to ESPN
- Thread starter oldxbbc
- Start date
The “travel factor” is routinely over-rated and mostly serves as a weak excuse for poor performances. Direct flight from Iowa to LA is around 4 hours. NBD for a 20yo athlete.
KF was still the HC, his prep work on bye weeks and Westerly travel has been less then stellar
In my experience jet lag is much less of an issue flying west than flying east.
The OSU game was at home, so is a non sequitur.
I'm still wondering about the 10 minute trip to the game and not going.
i.e. you are not a Hawkeye fan
i.e. you are not a Hawkeye fan
Sitting on plane in des Moines preparing for takeoff. Plane is full and about half are Hawkeye fans.
Rose Bowl stadium curse is on the line Friday night.
I realize the stadium isn’t remotely close to the UCLA campus but it’s also odd they have a home men’s basketball game starting during the football game.
I realize the stadium isn’t remotely close to the UCLA campus but it’s also odd they have a home men’s basketball game starting during the football game.
The Rose Bowl “curse” has coincided with Iowa playing some pretty damn good teams.
Maybe I’m crazy, but I’m guessing Iowa’s record against the team representing the Pac 8/10/12 champion would probably be pretty poor anywhere other than Kinnick Stadium, and maybe there too.
There’s no fvcking curse. They have lost to the better team every time, save maybe the ‘86 game against UCLA.
Maybe I’m crazy, but I’m guessing Iowa’s record against the team representing the Pac 8/10/12 champion would probably be pretty poor anywhere other than Kinnick Stadium, and maybe there too.
There’s no fvcking curse. They have lost to the better team every time, save maybe the ‘86 game against UCLA.
Agreed. Putting the home field advantage and time zone thing aside when Iowa has played in the Rose Bowl it has been against very good teams, this visit is really just about UCLA having the home field advantage and the time zone thing.
The more I think about it, the more I’m convinced that we’ll see something closer to Hawkeyes that played Michigan State than the ones that played Washington or Wisconsin.
I am not optimistic about this game. I’ll be overjoyed if I’m wrong, but I expect us to come out a step behind all night.
I am not optimistic about this game. I’ll be overjoyed if I’m wrong, but I expect us to come out a step behind all night.
Unfortunately I agree with you. Hope we are both wrong and the Hawks Roll!
For those of you that subscribe to the CR Gazette (not like the Gazette of years gone by unfortunately), 5 of 6 “expert pickers” say the Hawks will win. Go Hawks!
Yes, Iowa played pac12 champs in the rose bowl. We were underdogs in those games. This is a regular season big10 game.
UCLA was ahead 27-7 at one point. If you checked out at that point, you’d assume it was not competitive.
I know but the short trip was inconsequential to the poor performance.
That was a Cade game….this is Sully! We’re playing with more Swagger on both sides of the ball. If our secondary can avoid getting burned more than once we should be in this game. The running game has to succeed against a good run defense.
Thats what a lot of fans up here in NE Iowa think and I hope you and they are correct!!
Similar threads
