Interesting for sure. Without looking at Nebraska’s OOC during the years Nebraska lost a bunch of bowl games in a row, would it be safe to say they hardly played anyone? Meaning the Big 12 is what we have always said and was extremely weak? That’s not a flame attempt, just something I noticed.
I'm sure the argument could be made. Let me know what you think. I love looking at stuff like this regardless of team, but if its too much because of the sensitivities here, let me know.
Here is an interesting
chart regarding historical conference strength. Interesting that the strength of the Big 8 hit its low point in 1994, the year Nebraska won the national title over Miami. Couple of points regarding the Big 8 dip during that time:
- Oklahoma declined during the middle of that 7-year period, was sanctioned and ineligible for bowls in 1989 and 1990.
- Colorado had a strong 3 year run from 1989-1991, winning the conference outright twice and sharing it once and finishing #4, #1/2, and #20 nationally.
- I think the Big 8 had a dip in competitiveness, at least from it's top teams, during those years, and I think Nebraska's final rankings reflect that too. I just find it really interesting that regardless of their finish, teams they played in that 7-year stretch either finished #1 or 2 in at least one poll every year, so even when Nebraska wasn't one of the top 10 teams in the country, they were playing teams vying for national titles.
Here are the data (year, result, Nebraska finish AP/Coaches, team, team finish AP/Coaches):
1987 - 28-31 - #06/06 - FSU - #2/2
1988 - 03-23 - #10/10 - Miami - #2/2
1989 - 17-41 - #11/12 - FSU - #3/2
1990 - 21-45 - #24/17 - GT - #2/1
1991 - 00-22 - #15/16 - Miami - #2/1
1992 - 14-27 - #14/14 - FSU - #2/2
1993 - 16-18 - #03/03 - FSU - #1/1
- If you want to see something truly impressive, look at FSU's finishes from 1987 to 2000 (14 seasons). They never finished outside of the top 5 in either the coaches or AP poll a single time in that span, yet they only won the national championship twice.