Iowa State is probably the 4th best team the Hawkeyes have played.
more hawk obsession
carry on little bros
I was wondering the same thing and why he thinks the refs cheated ISU.Ok, I'm too lazy to google him, so I will ask. Who is Ray Hagar and why should we care?
I haven't even heard any Cyclone fans blame the refs for that loss.I was wondering the same thing and why he thinks the refs cheated ISU.
I haven't even heard any Cyclone fans blame the refs for that loss.
Neither have I.
There is a 14 page thread on ClownFanatic on the Iowa / WI game which is a little strange.
Neither have I.
There is a 14 page thread on ClownFanatic on the Iowa / WI game which is a little strange.
That is strange. I was at the game Saturday in Madison and there was a kid wearing Iowa state garb cheering for Wisconsin sitting right behind me with a bunch of whisky fans. Very strange.Neither have I.
There is a 14 page thread on ClownFanatic on the Iowa / WI game which is a little strange.
The lad is too young to appreciate that Bucky smoked Cy last time the teams played.That is strange. I was at the game Saturday in Madison and there was a kid wearing Iowa state garb cheering for Wisconsin sitting right behind me with a bunch of whisky fans. Very strange.
I looked a couple weeks ago and it showed there were only 2 teams better than ISU on the Iowa schedule. There were only two teams worst than Iowa on the ISU schedule. It says less about ISU relative to Iowa, as that result is known, but it really highlighted the difference in schedules. I suspect that will look a little different today, particularly with Iowa moving up as a more difficult team on the ISU schedule and some reshuffling of the top teams on the Iowa schedule.Iowa State is probably the 4th best team the Hawkeyes have played.
I looked a couple weeks ago and it showed there were only 2 teams better than ISU on the Iowa schedule. There were only two teams worst than Iowa on the ISU schedule. It says less about ISU relative to Iowa, as that result is known, but it really highlighted the difference in schedules. I suspect that will look a little different today, particularly with Iowa moving up as a more difficult team on the ISU schedule and some reshuffling of the top teams on the Iowa schedule.
What I was looking at was computer ranking adjusted for where the games are played. I did not make this up.NW, NEB, WIS, ILL, MINN, IND, PITT, all better than ISU. Dream on.
NW, NEB, WIS, ILL, MINN, IND, PITT, all better than ISU. Dream on.
What I was looking at was computer ranking adjusted for where the games are played. I did not make this up.
What I was looking at was computer ranking adjusted for where the games are played. I did not make this up.
I found a later version but it does not yet include Saturday's result. It shows Wisconsin, Northwestern and Nebraska as the only teams tougher than Iowa State on the Iowa schedule, adjusted for home or road. This is prior to Wisconsin & Nebraska losses and ISU win.NW, NEB, WIS, ILL, MINN, IND, PITT, all better than ISU. Dream on.
ISU might have negative net yards against Pitt .I found a later version but it does not yet include Saturday's result. It shows Wisconsin, Northwestern and Nebraska as the only teams tougher than Iowa State on the Iowa schedule, adjusted for home or road. This is prior to Wisconsin & Nebraska losses and ISU win.
Kansas, Northern Iowa and Texas are the only weaker teams on ISU's schedule. Iowa would be ahead of both Texas Tech and Toledo, except those are road games and Iowa was at home.
If you look at ISU's probability of wins on ESPN's site, only Texas is greater than 50%. Barely. Iowa is favored in all their games by a fairly wide margin, other than Northwestern and Nebraska. I'm surprised Nebraska is still shown as a loss, but it is on the road.
The Big 12 isn't as tough as advertised. Texas is a mess, T. Tech has no defense, Kansas may be the worst D1 team in college football, and K-State has been underwhelming.I looked a couple weeks ago and it showed there were only 2 teams better than ISU on the Iowa schedule. There were only two teams worst than Iowa on the ISU schedule. It says less about ISU relative to Iowa, as that result is known, but it really highlighted the difference in schedules. I suspect that will look a little different today, particularly with Iowa moving up as a more difficult team on the ISU schedule and some reshuffling of the top teams on the Iowa schedule.
Edit: I forgot to add that opponent difficulty was adjusted based on whether it was a home or away game.
I'd definitely put Pitt/Wisky/NW/Nebby and probably Indiana ahead of ISU...... and at this point you could make an argument either way for every other team on Iowa's schedule with the exceptions of Maryland and North Texas.I found a later version but it does not yet include Saturday's result. It shows Wisconsin, Northwestern and Nebraska as the only teams tougher than Iowa State on the Iowa schedule, adjusted for home or road. This is prior to Wisconsin & Nebraska losses and ISU win.
Kansas, Northern Iowa and Texas are the only weaker teams on ISU's schedule. Iowa would be ahead of both Texas Tech and Toledo, except those are road games and Iowa was at home.
If you look at ISU's probability of wins on ESPN's site, only Texas is greater than 50%. Barely. Iowa is favored in all their games by a fairly wide margin, other than Northwestern and Nebraska. I'm surprised Nebraska is still shown as a loss, but it is on the road.