Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No hog farming where I liveYou can’t feed your pigs pot. You’ll probably kill them.
It’s not shocking at all if you look at the analytics. Northwestern beat a walking mash unit when the played Wisconsin.Supposed to be chilly and chance of snow. We saw not too long ago how Nate does in less than stellar weather.
I honestly thought it'd be a "pick em" or the Hawks by a couple, but 10 is shocking. Unless Josh, Desmond, Josey, and some others are coming back to suit up, we still have a secondary that can be abused.
I feel sorry for you no matter what crappy place you live in.No hog farming where I live
This.Iowa will win by 14 or more
You don't feel sorry for anyone but yourselfI feel sorry for you no matter what crappy place you live in.
No, I feel sorry for the people like you in the world.You don't feel sorry for anyone but yourself
It’s not shocking at all if you look at the analytics. Northwestern beat a walking mash unit when the played Wisconsin.
You're sorry alrightNo, I feel sorry for the people like you in the world.
Who wouldn’t?
Huh?
Vegas is not in the business of predicting the outcome of games. The are in the gambling business. They set betting lines in an effort to get equal money bet on both sides so they make money on the juice. What is shady about that?
NW has looked much better than Iowa in the last couple of weeks, and they are certainly capable of winning at Kinnick,. NW is most effective when their passing game works, and Iowa has given up a bunch of big plays in the passing game. So why wouldn't NW be favored?
Iowa is favored by 10.
You’re really struggling. And I don’t just mean in life.You're sorry alright
Certainly not with youYou’re really struggling. And I don’t just mean in life.
I do think they were trying to gin up interest or something in this game. out in vegas. maybe a bunch of smart money came in on NW and they were trying to swing it. judging by the way the hawks are playing, I would have put it at 3.5 or one point or something, certainly no way hawks by 10. they barely beat isu by ten. and that was a struggle.Iowa is favored by 10.
Oh, you’ve been demolished by me! We’ve already proven that you live in a crappy town, feed your pigs pot, & you’re a Clown fan.Certainly not with you
Vegas relies quite a bit on advanced stats. My impression is that Northwestern, at least in Big 10 play, is punching above their expectations and Iowa is a bit below. Vegas sees Iowa as a bit "unlucky" to have lost all 3 of Purdue, PSU, and Wisconsin.Oh. My bad.
Well, that only makes sense if Vegas needs NW money, which they probably do.
Take NW and the points.
We have determined that you are a legend in your own mind and a mind is a terrible thing to waste......farm awayOh, you’ve been demolished by me! We’ve already proven that you live in a crappy town, feed your pigs pot, & you’re a Clown fan.
Anything I’m missing?
You should be proud to raise pigs & not ashamed. I love bacon just like everybody else.We have determined that you are a legend in your own mind and a mind is a terrible thing to waste......farm away
They're not favored.............Iowa is.Huh?
Vegas is not in the business of predicting the outcome of games. The are in the gambling business. They set betting lines in an effort to get equal money bet on both sides so they make money on the juice. What is shady about that?
NW has looked much better than Iowa in the last couple of weeks, and they are certainly capable of winning at Kinnick,. NW is most effective when their passing game works, and Iowa has given up a bunch of big plays in the passing game. So why wouldn't NW be favored?
They're not favored.............Iowa is.
That's why it is some shady sh**.
And after the way we were jobbed to Purdue last week, I'm starting to get pissed off at the direction things are going.
I know....That's why I said what I said earlier.Ok, my bad!
Still, Vegas does what it needs to do to get balanced money. I don't imagine NW has a heavy betting crowd, so they need some inventive to bet on NW.
For some perspective on this. Iowa averages 5.2 yds per offensive play Northwestern averages 4.4. meanwhile on defense Iowa allows 4.6 while Northwestern allows 5.4.Vegas relies quite a bit on advanced stats. My impression is that Northwestern, at least in Big 10 play, is punching above their expectations and Iowa is a bit below. Vegas sees Iowa as a bit "unlucky" to have lost all 3 of Purdue, PSU, and Wisconsin.
Holy shit, how stupid are you?NU will probably win the game, but not by 10 or more.
I know....That's why I said what I said earlier.
I don't appreciate their tone at all.
False, but we will most likely lose in the closing minutes.Horseshit, NW will roll this team.
Because it is some shady sh** by Vegas.Yeah, I think it was your post that helped me get confused. Although I'm naturally confused.
"Is that because everyone was picking Northwestern outright, so Vegas is trying to get people to throw their money away and pick Iowa?..............."
If everyone was picking NW, wouldn't they set the line to have NW giving the points, to encourage more better on Iowa?
Like I said .... confused.
Because it is some shady sh** by Vegas.
And bau....it serves as typical inspirational bullsh** rah-rah-rah underdog talk for Fat Pat to fire up his team.
The whole thing smells like f***ing garbage, including Pat Fitzgerald.
They can't run the ball at all.
But those aren't good numbers. The Notre Dame game average is less than 3 yds per carry that's bad. The Wisconsin game is less than 4 yds per carry. Most teams probably look at 4 yds per carry as adequate.You might like to check the last two games, when we actually started playing a productive running back. Vs Notre Dame, 108 yards on 40 attempts vs. ND's 121 yards on 40 attempts. Vs Wisconsin, 182 yards on 49 attempts vs. Wisconsin's 165 yards on 32 attempts. I don't think you want to argue that ND or Wisconsin "can't run the ball either," nor do you want to argue that their run defenses stink.
If you're looking at season stats, you have to reflect on the fact that we lost our feature back to a medical issue early in the season and have been looking for an answer until the game vs UW.
You might like to check the last two games, when we actually started playing a productive running back. Vs Notre Dame, 108 yards on 40 attempts vs. ND's 121 yards on 40 attempts. Vs Wisconsin, 182 yards on 49 attempts vs. Wisconsin's 165 yards on 32 attempts. I don't think you want to argue that ND or Wisconsin "can't run the ball either," nor do you want to argue that their run defenses stink.
If you're looking at season stats, you have to reflect on the fact that we lost our feature back to a medical issue early in the season and have been looking for an answer until the game vs UW.
You guys will easily beat NW, but you still won't win the West
Wiscy will most likely win it
You guys will easily beat NW, but you still won't win the West
Wiscy will most likely win it
Okay....You might like to check the last two games, when we actually started playing a productive running back. Vs Notre Dame, 108 yards on 40 attempts vs. ND's 121 yards on 40 attempts. Vs Wisconsin, 182 yards on 49 attempts vs. Wisconsin's 165 yards on 32 attempts. I don't think you want to argue that ND or Wisconsin "can't run the ball either," nor do you want to argue that their run defenses stink.
If you're looking at season stats, you have to reflect on the fact that we lost our feature back to a medical issue early in the season and have been looking for an answer until the game vs UW.