Look in the mirror, patriot. trump outspent them all. And he'll do it again.
In March he'll sign a continuing resolution to increase spending.
Although he certainly has you fooled.
Iowa park ranger frustrated by sudden layoff as part of Trump purge
- Thread starter cigaretteman
- Start date
In March he'll sign a continuing resolution to increase spending.
Although he certainly has you fooled.
True as to Trump, the thought comes from the Stephen Miller types surrounding him.
Interest expense of about ~$1T plays a big part.
Now you're an expert in park maintenance?
People losing their jobs is always great for the economy.
What exactly do you envision needing rebuilt?
Take the DOE for instance. Education outcomes in this country have deteriorated since its inception.
What is the most recent talking point handed down by the cult known as the DNC? Could it be constitutional crisis?
Every liberal pundit on CNN/ MSNBC have received the message loud and clear, haven't they?
Everything being torn down without audit will be built back better, again.
It's a badge of honor to those people.
They don't care about anyone but themselves.
Which I hope will be met with the same bipartisan outrage as when RDS tried to put condos and pickleball courts in Florida's state parks.
It's not a personal thing,.. If we have jobs that don't need to exist, they should be eliminated.
And then the R's will care about the national debt again, because hopefully a Democrat will be back in office
Do you think someone can make an informed decision as to whether every one of these jobs "don't need to exist" after a few weeks of review?
So Elon??? You're referring to Elon, right?
As I said in another thread — imagine the condos and casinos that can be built at Yellowstone or Yosemite.
I don't think he actually wants an informed conversation.
Scientists? University? When did Louisiana go Marxist?
Wokeism is OUT, Patriotism is IN, get with the program Louisiana!
Yes,.. But I also understand that no matter what gets considered for cutting, there will always be those arguing to maintain the status quo...
You agree that a technocrat with no government background, especially in national park services, can make an informed decision of who should be fired within a month? Don't give me the answer that someone getting fired won't like it.
Setting aside the tag of technocrat, lacking in government background,.. I believe I already said yes.
Just to confirm. You are okay with someone that has zero experience in your industry or your job deciding if you should keep it?
Wow. Even doubling down. Your position is what happened with the nuclear weapons workers was an informed decision?
Happens every day, welcome to the real world,.. Or are you asking me if I'm supposed to like it?
So just randomly cutting every job based on the person being in that position for less than a year (even transfers) and citing every firing as 'for cause' regardless of their record seems like a good idea to you.
It really doesn't. I am not so sure you have any real world experience. It's not like you see on tv or the movies. Consultants are typically brought in. Maybe not for fry cooks.
Plenty of jobs in the area >
www.claytoncountyia.gov
Jobs • Clayton County, IA • CivicEngage
Use the jobs module to search employment opportunities. You may also subscribe to job posting notifications.
All the more reason to scale back the size of Govt. Right?
Depends. Need more revenue. We aren't saving our way out of a $1T annual interest expense. Also need to get the budget balanced, while maintaining essential functions of government.
Since you brought it up in this thread, what is it exactly you think that the Federal DOE does? What do you think they are tasked with, and specifically what do they do that tie to "education outcomes in this country have deteriorated since its inception."
So what specifically does the F DOE do?
Going after jobs before looking for actual waste is a lazy approach. Most Americans support getting rid of waste.
State Parks vs Fed Parks.... that aside, this falls into the category "Trump, Elon and other wealthy folks do not use these services so they deem them "unnecessary"." When they want to go to the wilderness or some of the Trump family goes hunting, they have rich friends who they pay thousands of dollars for private access to the outdoors.
So govt funded and maintained parks are not a priority for them, and now they have MAGA agreeing that the US Park system is also unnecessary. The 325M people who access the parks each year likely disagree, and I'd bet some of the folks cheering for the firings now, will be complaining when they lose access to parks. They just don't realize it yet.
So govt funded and maintained parks are not a priority for them, and now they have MAGA agreeing that the US Park system is also unnecessary. The 325M people who access the parks each year likely disagree, and I'd bet some of the folks cheering for the firings now, will be complaining when they lose access to parks. They just don't realize it yet.
National parks are not a private enterprise. They are there for all Americans. Lots of Republicans over the years wanted them to be that way.
And, this isn’t a targeted layoff due to a specific need or lack of merit for those fired. You are working overtime to defend something that is very unpopular and unwise. . We like our national parks. This will end poorly for Trump.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
HawkCast Ep 126 Iowa Women COMPETE w/ OSU, Will MBB Make the B1G Tourney?
- Latest: Eliot Clough
-
