Guyton will be a key player next year as will Mallegni. It doesn’t make sense they would transfer but I know anything is possible.Where do I find that? I’d like to listen. Or read it. Whatever it’s on. Lol
Guyton will be a key player next year as will Mallegni. It doesn’t make sense they would transfer but I know anything is possible.Where do I find that? I’d like to listen. Or read it. Whatever it’s on. Lol
I would expect Guyton to start.I don't have any specific information on transfers, but Guyton and Mallegni are both in a fairly similar position. Their roles will probably increase next year, but I don't expect either to be starters. There's also a chance if Iowa hits on its 2026 targets that they won't ever be starters, but that's too far out to be certain.
One other area that could have an impact on transfers is revenue sharing. Chad Leistikow had an article on Hawk Central today that mentioned Iowa WBB will get more revenue sharing money than most other WBB programs so the program stays competitive nationally. If so, any transfers out might not be able to make as much at another school as they could at Iowa.
Revenue sharing might also explain why Feuerbach came back. There's a pretty good chance she'll make more at Iowa next year than she would in most jobs just out of college.
I don't have any specific information on transfers, but Guyton and Mallegni are both in a fairly similar position. Their roles will probably increase next year, but I don't expect either to be starters. There's also a chance if Iowa hits on its 2026 targets that they won't ever be starters, but that's too far out to be certain.
One other area that could have an impact on transfers is revenue sharing. Chad Leistikow had an article on Hawk Central today that mentioned Iowa WBB will get more revenue sharing money than most other WBB programs so the program stays competitive nationally. If so, any transfers out might not be able to make as much at another school as they could at Iowa.
Revenue sharing might also explain why Feuerbach came back. There's a pretty good chance she'll make more at Iowa next year than she would in most jobs just out of college.
That's the one. The focus is mostly MBB, but gives some good info on the revenue sharing with other programs. I then found this website, which has estimates that either match or are in the ballpark of Chad's.Is the title to that article you're referencing something like, Beth Goetz needs to fix Iowa basketball's math problem?
If not, can you give out whatever you feel comfortable doing to find that article?
Right now my baseline assumption is McCabe, Feuerbach, Stuelke, and Heiden start. The first three already do, and Heiden is almost certainly going to. That leaves the last spot for Guyton or Deal and I think Deal gets it.I would expect Guyton to start.
That's the one. The focus is mostly MBB, but gives some good info on the revenue sharing with other programs. I then found this website, which has estimates that either match or are in the ballpark of Chad's.
FWIW, doing some math combining Chad's numbers with the estimates, I would expect Iowa WBB's pot to be quite a bit better than the website average.
No not rumors.Come on man, we are really just talking about rumors, right ?
I think we're similar. Note: this is all estimates based on Chad's article, NIL estimates, and some speculation. None of this is sourced.Reverse engineering the WBB NIL war chest is my next endeavor to somewhat try to crack it with the limited info from Beth G and Brad H.
Beth Goetz said she won't disclose the %'s or individual payout numbers per sport. However, believe we have some guidepost here to help ballpark guesstimate it.
My Guidepost (4 References):
1) Average Revenue Sharing % per Sport(s)
Football - 78.3%
Mens Basketball - 15.0%
All Other Sports - 6.7%
2) Texas Tech's Kirby Hocutt one of first ADs to detail distribution of the $20.5M rev-share by sport:
FB $15.1M (74%)
MBB $3.6M (17.5%)
WBB $410K (2%)
BSB $390K (1.9%)
Others $920K (4.5%)
90% to FB/MBB will be standard across P4, as reported here last month.
3) How UGA plans to distribute $20.5 million in revenue share to athletes
"Georgia is planning to directly pay players the maximum allowed of about $20.5 million with about $2.5 million of that going to new scholarships working off a model in the preliminary House vs. NCAA antitrust settlement.
Football players would get at least 75 percent of the revenue after scholarships, men’s basketball players 15 percent and women’s basketball players 5 percent."
"Football players are expected to get at least $13.5 million, men’s basketball players about $2.7 million and women’s basketball players about $900,000. Other sport athletes like baseball, track and gymnastics could get a percentage of the remaining pie.
![]()
Georgia athletics unveils plan for its $20.5 million in revenue sharing with athletes
How will Georgia athletics divvy up the $20.5 million it plans to distribute to players in revenue sharing? Athletic director Josh Brooks offers detailswww.onlineathens.com
4) Now from the article you referenced it stated MBB would need $4.5MM - $5MM to compete in the new NIL world starting next season/July. Now it also stated only 2.5MM would come out of Rev Share pot for MBB and Brad's Swarm needed to provide $2MM to cover minimum for MBB if I'm reading it right. this seems to match Geogia's # for MBB.
SEC gets the $20.5MM Rev Share figure while the BIG gets ~20MM/ea program. So we'll work with $20MM here.
Plus according to the Georgia article above they took out new scholarships out of this settlement # and that was $2.5MM deducted from the total. According to the article, this is the way it's legally structured in the House settlement so far. So we may need to reduce the $20MM down to $17.5MM (have no idea how much IA will be so I'll use the Georgia $2.5MM for it).
However, according the Texas Tech AD #'s above, they used the full $20.5MM to arrive at the NIL allocations per sport. I'm using the Texas Tech #'s full amount for now. Maybe when the House Settlement approval comes out on April 7th we'll get more clarity on whether new scholarships come out of this # also.
Working with those reference numbers as guidepost, here are the numbers I've come up with so far.
B1G Settlement Amount: $20MM
Rev Share Arm:
Rev Share Example IA Split #1:
FB: $15MM (75%)
MBB: $2.5MM (12.5% - this leaves a short fall of 2.5% to reach that 90% for both FB + MBB)
WBB: $400k (2%)
Others: $2.1 MM (10.5% - it's 5.5% higher than Georgia 5% and the MBB 2.5% short fall is also included in this #)
Rev Share Example IA Split #2 (reallocation of funds to match expectations and Georgia's top WBB NIL #):
FB: $15.5MM (77.5% - picks up 2.5% MBB short fall to reach the 90% FB + MBB %)
MBB: $2.5MM (12.5%)
WBB: $1MM (5% - picks up 3% out of the Others pot to match Georgia's WBB of 5% to leave it also with 5%)
Others: $1 MM (5%)
Charity/Base Arm:
Somewhere I got the figure that it was believed ~$15k was allotted for WBB when they were under the all equal pay program at Iowa. Most likely this came out of the Charity/Base NIL program Brad runs. So that amounts to:
$15k * 15 players = $225k (for some reason this seems low prior to Rev Share #s)
Would think Lucy coming on board this season altered the same pay for everyone that they originally started out with. Just going to throw out a # of $75k here. So the Charity/Base war chest goes up to $300k for a nice round # on Brad's side.
WBB Totals:
Rev Share: $1MMk
Charity/Base Arm: $300k
Total: ~$1.3MM WBB War Chest
Now my gut tells me this might be on the low side yet from listening to both Beth and Brad as we're one of the top WBB NIL programs in the nation. I'm thinking all the donations that went to Swarm WBB pot instead of the MBB pot because of Fran. Thinking this could be ~another $200k which would bring the WBB NIL range from ~$1.3MM - $1.5MM.
According to you, "I would expect Iowa WBB's pot to be quite a bit better than the website average" and I agree 100%.
Now you may have picked up better resource #'s elsewhere that can provide more insight than the #'s presented here.
If I may ask, where do you believe we ~sit with this WBB NIL range?
Stremlow's response is not surprising. KF may take some of her minutes next year, but Taylor's response is positive. Just another thing I enjoy about the Iowa WB culture.Addie Deal, Kate Martin and others on...
Kylie Feuerbach's Iowa Hawkeyes return elicits 1-word reaction from 5-star signee Addie Deal
![]()
Kylie Feuerbach's Iowa Hawkeyes return elicits 1-word reaction from 5-star signee Addie Deal
Addie Deal, the Iowa Hawkeyes signee and the No. 15 overall prospect in the Class of 2025 (as per On3's Industry Rankings), was elated by Kylie Feuerbach's decision to return to the Hawkeyes.www.sportskeeda.com
ONE MORE YEAR
![]()
![]()
Neither McCabe or Feurbach can play the point. Guyton will start at the point.Right now my baseline assumption is McCabe, Feuerbach, Stuelke, and Heiden start. The first three already do, and Heiden is almost certainly going to. That leaves the last spot for Guyton or Deal and I think Deal gets it.
I could see a world where Guyton has a great off-season and beats out McCabe at the 2, but I think that's far less than 50%.
🤔 there’s the portal yet, we have our sharp shooter Taylor yet. 50/50.I would expect Guyton to start.
That is where there is some advantage in how Iowa's program supplies such a family-oriented culture. That way if a player has their parent in their head ... they also have that strong-tug back to the program attributable to their kinship with their teammates.With these two players mentioned I hear a lot about their fathers getting in their head.
I'm assuming Deal will start at PG.Neither McCabe or Feurbach can play the point. Guyton will start at the point.
Don't discount a portal pickup.I'm assuming Deal will start at PG.
Iowa will NOT be looking at a PG in the portal. 100% certain unless there are roster subtractions which in this day in age is very possible. They will be interested in a stretch 3 or 4 in the 6'0-6'2 range. That is what I've heard.Don't discount a portal pickup.
Don't discount a portal pickup.
Maybe, but really no one a proven GOOD pg.Iowa has 3 or 4 that can play the point unlike last year, with only freshmen coming in.
Where do I find that? I’d like to listen. Or read it. Whatever it’s on. Lol
Maybe, but really no one a proven GOOD pg.
Maybe but who is a proven 2 or a proven 3 or a proven 4/5? Kylie and Hannah have proven them selves, but that's it. Hannah and Kylie cannot play both positions at the same time.
Now take this with grain a salt. Know this isn't the end all. However, here's what is noticed in the team reaction.
1) Guyton goes over to the new circle, is bouncy and the last person to hug Kylie before they have a big group hug. She does not stand back like some others. Just a hunch that she is happy and engaged and spells good news.
2) Someone can correct me, but as far as I can tell, Teagan Mallegni isn't in either circle. It seems she is missing from this announcement. Can only guess she's not at practice for a prior engagement or sick.
So until further news comes out, I'd say there isn't much to it.
Yikes! Hack-a-Shaq 2.0Layla Hays led her Wasilla team to the state finals tomorrow (Saturday) with 17 points and 20 rebounds. However, she was only 3 of 16 from the free throw line. Needs a lot of work there.
Holy cow close your eyes and you could probably make 1 of 5 FTAs. Impressive boards though.Layla Hays led her Wasilla team to the state finals tomorrow (Saturday) with 17 points and 20 rebounds. However, she was only 3 of 16 from the free throw line. Needs a lot of work there.
I think people are still way to caught up in old school positions.
It’s more like put your best five matchups on the court.
Layla Hays led her Wasilla team to the state finals tomorrow (Saturday) with 17 points and 20 rebounds. However, she was only 3 of 16 from the free throw line. Needs a lot of work there.
About a month ago, I was trying to find some stats on her and ended up on her sister’s stats (plays for Eastern Washington). She is a 41% FT shooter for her collegiate career, so could be an issue.Holy cow close your eyes and you could probably make 1 of 5 FTAs. Impressive boards though.
Some highlights from it...
"Wasilla and Mountain City played lights out, with more lead changes than you could count, in a 59-54 Wasilla win in overtime. Despite a great defensive effort to slow her down, Wasilla’s Layla Hays was able to muster 17 points with 20 rebounds for the game. Savannah Kroon made some key shots when they were needed for Wasilla, finishing with 12.
Mountain City was no pushover, and led by Morgan Maldonado’s 20 points and 11 by Nyatuong Majiok, the Lions consistently answered Wasilla’s scoring efforts with their own. In a rematch of last year’s championship, Wasilla will now play rival Colony for the 4A girls title."
She won't see the floor much, if that continues.Layla Hays led her Wasilla team to the state finals tomorrow (Saturday) with 17 points and 20 rebounds. However, she was only 3 of 16 from the free throw line. Needs a lot of work there.
She will likely need some time to develop.She won't see the floor much, if that continues.
Hannah wasn't much better as a freshman but she's worked hard at getting better.She won't see the floor much, if that continues.
OK, then who would be your proven five returning?