ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa wrestling and gambling


History Speaks. My edits, word-count restrictions.

Chis Vannini. College Sports Gambling Scandals: A brief history from the Brooklyn Five to Brad Bohannon. Athletic, May 2023.​

College sports gambling scandals: A brief history from the Brooklyn Five to Brad Bohannon

By Chris Vannini
May 9, 2023

Sports betting has come to the forefront of the conversation surrounding college athletics. Suspicious wagers on an Alabama baseball game that have led to the dismissal of head coach Brad Bohannon, followed up by Monday’s announcement that Iowa and Iowa State are looking into allegations of online gambling involving at least 41 combined players across multiple sports, highlight how big this issue has become.

1945: The Brooklyn Five

What happened:
Five Brooklyn College men’s basketball players accepted $1,000 to intentionally lose a game against Akron. Police, tracking a robbery suspect, discovered the scheme during an unrelated raid on an apartment where the five players were present before the game against Akron was played.

1947-51: Men’s basketball point shaving

What happened:
Thirty-three players across seven schools were found to be involved in point shaving over 86 games from 1947 to 1950. Seven players were on the 1949-50 City College of New York men’s basketball team, which won the 1950 NCAA Tournament and NIT (the only double in history). In 1951, Manhattan College center Junius Kellogg was approached by a former Manhattan player and offered $1,000 to fix a game by losing by five or six points. He refused and told his coach and then the police. He later wore a wire to gather evidence on other gamblers, which led the investigation to organized crime.

1957-61: Men’s basketball point shaving

What happened:
Molinas, who had escaped the 1951 scandal, became the No. 3 pick in the 1953 NBA Draft, but he was suspended during his rookie season for gambling on games. He stayed involved in the gambling world and helped lead another scheme that touched dozens of players across 22 schools from 1957 to 1961. Florida football player Jon McBeth was approached with a bribe and told his coach. Word made its way to the police again.

1978-79: Boston College men’s basketball

What happened:
Several Boston College players were recruited by organized crime to shave points during nine games in the 1978-79 season. Players were paid hundreds of dollars for their participation and given the chance by fixers to earn more by betting on the games. Only four of the nine affected games produced a winning bet, and the scheme fizzled out.

1985: Tulane men’s basketball

What happened:
Three Tulane students recruited five players to shave points in two games against Southern Miss and Memphis State. A week after the season, rumors of the fixing spread. A local attorney investigated and told district attorney Harry Connick (father of singer Harry Connick Jr.), who jumped on the case.

1994: Arizona State men’s basketball

What happened:
Players Stevin Smith and Isaac Burton were paid by bookmaker Benny Silman to make sure ASU didn’t cover the spread in four games at the end of the 1993-94 season. Smith reportedly owed Silman football gambling debts. Smith received $20,000 ($10,000 in cash and $10,000 in debt wiped away) for shaving points in one game and also bet on his own games.

1994-95 Northwestern

What happened:
Northwestern suspended two athletes in late 1994 for betting on games they weren’t involved in, including its then-all-time leading rusher Dennis Lundy on the football team and Kenneth Lee on the men’s basketball team. After returning from suspension, Lee continued gambling and point-shaved three games with teammate Dewey Williams, looking to make sure Northwestern lost games by more than the point spread. Lee received $4,000 and was set to receive another $8,000 for the scheme, but money was lost in the third game when Northwestern covered the spread.

1995: Maryland football and basketball

What happened:
A handful of players across both teams bet on college football and basketball games, including record-breaking quarterback Scott Milanovich, who reportedly placed six bets totaling $200. None of those bets were on Maryland games.

1996: Boston College football

What happened:
Upwards of 25 to 30 players bet on various sports games through a student bookie who was on the golf team, and two players bet on Boston College to lose an October game against Syracuse, though neither player had a role in the loss. Rumors of gambling had spread among the team, leading to an investigation.

2003: Washington football coach Rick Neuheisel fired for bracket pool

What happened:
Neuheisel participated in a neighborhood pool for the 2003 NCAA men’s basketball tournament and initially denied the accusations to NCAA investigators. He had received an internal UW memo that claimed off-campus tournament pools were allowed. An NCAA investigation looked into a potential show-cause penalty for Neuheisel.

2004-06: Toledo football and men’s basketball

What happened:
Two Detroit-area businessmen paid Toledo football and men’s basketball players from December 2004 to December 2006 to influence the final score of games. Investigators learned of the scheme in a wiretapped conversation.

2011: University of San Diego basketball

What happened:
Former USD assistant coach Thaddeus Brown convinced point guard Brandon Johnson to shave points for up to $10,000 per game during the 2009-10 season, the FBI claimed, adding that at least four games were affected. Johnson was a former star player with NBA dreams whose career had been derailed by injuries. An unrelated drug-trafficking and illegal casino investigation uncovered an individual’s connection with Brown and Johnson, ultimately revealing the basketball scheme.

2012: Auburn men’s basketball

What happened:
Point guard Kyievarez Ward was accused of attempting to fix an Auburn game against Arkansas in January 2012. He came off the bench but fell to the floor with an apparent leg injury after 19 seconds. Arkansas won the game. He was suspended before the next Arkansas game in February.
Almost completely irrelevant to, let's say, some college athlete betting $50 on something like a UFC fight. People can be corrupt (shocker), and athletes not being able to personally gamble won't stop the above. Not being able to legally gamble won't stop illegal bribery.

Regardless, the athletes knew their ridiculous and unnecessary restrictions concerning what other citizens have the right to legally have fun with. They'll rightly have to pay some price for that.

Personally, I think gambling is a terrible idea. But I think that's true concerning drinking, fornicating, partying, and a host of other things. That morality shouldn't be legislated, let alone unfairly by the NCAA. Let the school decide their team's policies. The NCAA should get out of the personal lives of athletes when some activity has nothing to do with giving them or anybody else an unfair advantage.
 
Almost completely irrelevant to, let's say, some college athlete betting $50 on something like a UFC fight. People can be corrupt (shocker), and athletes not being able to personally gamble won't stop the above. Not being able to legally gamble won't stop illegal bribery.

Regardless, the athletes knew their ridiculous and unnecessary restrictions concerning what other citizens have the right to legally have fun with. They'll rightly have to pay some price for that.

Personally, I think gambling is a terrible idea. But I think that's true concerning drinking, fornicating, partying, and a host of other things. That morality shouldn't be legislated, let alone unfairly by the NCAA. Let the school decide their team's policies. The NCAA should get out of the personal lives of athletes when some activity has nothing to do with giving them or anybody else an unfair advantage.
Interesting take. I agree with most everything until the last paragraph. And I’m just not sure with that part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LIV4GOD
Almost completely irrelevant to, let's say, some college athlete betting $50 on something like a UFC fight. People can be corrupt (shocker), and athletes not being able to personally gamble won't stop the above. Not being able to legally gamble won't stop illegal bribery.

Regardless, the athletes knew their ridiculous and unnecessary restrictions concerning what other citizens have the right to legally have fun with. They'll rightly have to pay some price for that.

Personally, I think gambling is a terrible idea. But I think that's true concerning drinking, fornicating, partying, and a host of other things. That morality shouldn't be legislated, let alone unfairly by the NCAA. Let the school decide their team's policies. The NCAA should get out of the personal lives of athletes when some activity has nothing to do with giving them or anybody else an unfair advantage.
Ahhh! Spoken like a true Hawkeye!
 
  • Like
Reactions: LIV4GOD
Interesting article (link below) in today’s Iowa City Press Citizen; Travis Hines ISU assignment writer. A statement/paragraph in his report that caught my attention; the verbatim below.

“The issue of proxy and messenger betting is a hot topic,” Miller wrote in an email to the Register, “not really because of what is going on in Iowa but because of concerns regarding money laundering.”​
 
Was told this afternoon that the coaches are expecting to be notified by Friday of what, who and how long.

finally-tardy.gif
 
I'm pretty sure that you can't bet on individual college athletes in the state of Iowa. Its possible he could have made a bet outside of Iowa on himself, but not on one of the apps or at a casino in Iowa.
On betfred they had duals and key matches in duals. Most iowa and isu dual had a few matches you could bet on. For example Carr and O'toole always had a line. They actually did a great job of identifying the swing matches with a betting line.
 
Almost completely irrelevant to, let's say, some college athlete betting $50 on something like a UFC fight. People can be corrupt (shocker), and athletes not being able to personally gamble won't stop the above. Not being able to legally gamble won't stop illegal bribery.

Regardless, the athletes knew their ridiculous and unnecessary restrictions concerning what other citizens have the right to legally have fun with. They'll rightly have to pay some price for that.

Personally, I think gambling is a terrible idea. But I think that's true concerning drinking, fornicating, partying, and a host of other things. That morality shouldn't be legislated, let alone unfairly by the NCAA. Let the school decide their team's policies. The NCAA should get out of the personal lives of athletes when some activity has nothing to do with giving them or anybody else an unfair advantage.
Organized gambling is corrupting. I'm not talking about poker with your buddies, or small side bets with your friends, or the office pool for March Madness. Go to any race track or casino and watch so many sad people pump money into into stupid games where the house almost always wins, but they come back again and again thinking that their luck will turn. Now they can lose that money at home with their phone.

Overall, organized gambling is not victimless. Sooner or later some athlete will shave points or throw a match if the money gets big enough. Colleges that punish sports betting by college athletes aren't legislating morality. They're trying to protect our sport from corruption.

As for drugs, alcohol, and (OMG) fornication 😳, colleges, governments, and religions have tried to "legislate" that too, but it doesn't work and never will. It's a free country. So I don't care if you drink a beer, smoke a joint, or get laid, but please keep those greedy mitts off corrupting my favorite college sport.
 
Overall, organized gambling is not victimless. Sooner or later some athlete will shave points or throw a match if the money gets big enough. Colleges that punish sports betting by college athletes aren't legislating morality. They're trying to protect our sport from corruption.
Oh, I think they are still legislating morality to at least some degree, because a legal adult college athlete who is betting on a sport not at all related to their own is certainly not at all corrupting the sport they are in.

BTW, I enjoy how some of you are having a hoot out of me typing "fornication." In truth, that will do far more damage to society than gambling ever will. Adding all the amounts of pure relationship misery, suffering, disease, abortions, divorces, murder, even suicide due to that sin is staggering. And, yet, as damaging as it is, I in no way want the government legislating it. Stay out of the lives of these athletes. Goodness, men this age were in B17s over Europe and storming the beaches of Normandy.
 
Last edited:
Oh, I think they are still legislating morality to at least some degree, because a legal adult college athlete who is betting on a sport not at all related to their own is certainly not at all corrupting the sport they are in.

BTW, I enjoy how some of you are having a hoot out of me typing "fornication." In truth, that will do far more damage to society than gambling ever will. Adding all the amounts of pure relationship misery, suffering, disease, abortions, divorces, murder, even suicide due to that sin is staggering. And, yet, as damaging as it is, I in no way want the government legislating it. Stay out of the lives of these athletes. Goodness, men this age were in B17s over Europe and storming the beaches of Normandy.
Not accepting how God made some of his children has led to way too many suicides by teens.
 
<<Was told this afternoon that the coaches are expecting to be notified by Friday of what, who and how long.>>

They pretty much know already. The athlete's have communicated who/how much they bet on and now there is a formula.. what will be interesting is if there are appeals ( someone else used my phone) etc.
 
Interesting article (link below) in today’s Iowa City Press Citizen; Travis Hines ISU assignment writer. A statement/paragraph in his report that caught my attention; the verbatim below.

“The issue of proxy and messenger betting is a hot topic,” Miller wrote in an email to the Register, “not really because of what is going on in Iowa but because of concerns regarding money laundering.”​

Reading between the lines here: it sounds like we are going to find out that legal-age teammates placed bets for some who are not yet 21 years old. And that they communicated the bets they wanted to place electronically through a messaging app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: el dub
Do you think it ends up well or bad for the wrestlers
Depends on how you are looking at it.

Overall, its bad. A lot of guys are going to be serving some form of suspension. But it is really Good compared to what it could have been prior to the NCAA releasing the new guidelines/rules

I bet we see a frontloaded schedule with a bunch of BS "dates" from both ISU and Iowa so that guys can serve their time early on and not miss any major duals.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mountain Man Hawk
... Personally, I think gambling is a terrible idea. But I think that's true concerning drinking, fornicating, partying, and a host of other things. That morality shouldn't be legislated, let alone unfairly by the NCAA. Let the school decide their team's policies. The NCAA should get out of the personal lives of athletes when some activity has nothing to do with giving them or anybody else an unfair advantage.
Incidentally, fornication notwithstanding, there is an old legal adage; hard cases make bad law.

To this point, the NCAA’s newly established set of rules and regulations related to student-athlete gambling seems an effort to cover a plethora of gaming/gambling platforms. Make no mistake, these (gambling troubles) are very hard cases. And it appears unlikely that one suite will fit everybody.

Certainly I do not think the NCAA’s recent directive is/are doomed to fail. However I do believe their actions are destined to create lots of heartburn; and a lot of heartburn. A great deal of uncertainty surrounds the issue(s) of student-athlete gambling.
 
Last edited:
Depends on how you are looking at it.

Overall, its bad. A lot of guys are going to be serving some form of suspension. But it is really Good compared to what it could have been prior to the NCAA releasing the new guidelines/rules

I bet we see a frontloaded schedule with a bunch of BS "dates" from both ISU and Iowa so that guys can serve their time early on and not miss any major duals.

That's not going to happen. The schedule is largely set and the number of participation dates is dictated by the NCAA.
 
Right? Because we never have cupcake eating contests early in the season. Nevah…
suppose upper iowa and grand view type tournaments count?

Even if they do including those will add to the total being averaged so won’t help a lot ?

not sure I worded that well but math is hard….

I don’t remember how the new laws were worded exactly….. did it say regular season?

Wrestling is kind of unique in that it has all the open tournaments…… football seems more cut and dry with a set number of games

the Iowa / Iowa State dual could be a bunch of backups
 
  • Like
Reactions: el dub
Oh, I think they are still legislating morality to at least some degree, because a legal adult college athlete who is betting on a sport not at all related to their own is certainly not at all corrupting the sport they are in.

BTW, I enjoy how some of you are having a hoot out of me typing "fornication." In truth, that will do far more damage to society than gambling ever will. Adding all the amounts of pure relationship misery, suffering, disease, abortions, divorces, murder, even suicide due to that sin is staggering. And, yet, as damaging as it is, I in no way want the government legislating it. Stay out of the lives of these athletes. Goodness, men this age were in B17s over Europe and storming the beaches of Normandy.
If you're going there then please don't forget those in the Pacific Theater as well.
 
suppose upper iowa and grand view type tournaments count?

Even if they do including those will add to the total being averaged so won’t help a lot ?

not sure I worded that well but math is hard….

I don’t remember how the new laws were worded exactly….. did it say regular season?

Wrestling is kind of unique in that it has all the open tournaments…… football seems more cut and dry with a set number of games

the Iowa / Iowa State dual could be a bunch of backups
ISU's lineup looks like that anyway.

Just watch if ISU has one starter out and Iowa has 4-5 out and the Clones still lose.
That would be epic.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT