ADVERTISEMENT

IowaLaw's Objective Mid-Season Report Card: Offense

IowasLaw

HB All-State
Nov 19, 2019
556
2,812
93
We are already at the midpoint in the season! The Hawks sit at 4-2 with a pretty favorable schedule still ahead. It's been an up and down year, with Iowa looking as bad as they've ever looked last week followed by the best offensive performance in recent memory against a rebuilding Washington team. So how have the position groups performed when compared with expectations and the rest of the 18 team Big 10 conference?

1. QB: D-. Iowa sits at 17th of 18 Big 10 teams in passing offense. That's REAL bad. Cade McNamara, Jon Budmeyer's highest profile recruit and the Swarm's largest financial investment...sits at 16th in the conference in yards per game at just 132. Sadly, his yards per attempt ranks even worse (DEAD LAST among Big 10 QBs). The numbers are especially bad because several of Cade's 1 yard passes that Kirk himself could have completed were extended 20+ yards by virtue of having an all-American running back who can turn a 1 yard gain into a 20 yard gain. Even Cade's completion percentage on his exclusively short passes is near the bottom of the Big 10 at just 63%. By comparison, five QBs in the conference are well above 70%. QB play is the weakest link on the entire team and no one other than Kirk Ferentz would give Cade a better grade than D-.

2. RB: A+. Unexpectedly, the Hawkeyes rank #1 in the Big 10 in rushing offense. That's unheard of. Despite coming into the season as Iowa's 3rd string RB, Kaleb Johnson ranks #1 in the Big 10 in yards per game, yards per carry, and touchdowns! Pretty amazing considering all the RB talent out there. If the Hawks had simply blocked Iowa State's lucky 54 yrd field goal, Johnson would be on everyone's radar as a Heisman contender. And while second stringer Moulton isn't setting the world on fire, he ranks 4th among Big 10 freshmen in yards per game, so the future is bright at the position.

3. WR: F. Sadly, the running joke about Iowa's WR group being the worst in college football will now continue for a 6th consecutive year. Gone is undertalented & undersized 5 year starter Ragaini, and in comes a new crop of WR recruits no other Power 5 program wanted. Iowa's one playmaker, their 4 star WR OSU transfer Brown, found himself in Kirk's doghouse and bolted mid-season after only catching 1 ball all year. Iowa's #2 receiver, Anderson, has been hurt with a mysterious injury that has lingered for 2 years and has caught a grand total of 1 ball all season. Wetjen, the fastest and most dynamic player on the roster...1 catch all year. Many were high on Buie & Howard returning this year, yet they have a combined...3 catches. With so many recruiting misses, the Hawks are left using the WR talent pulled from the transfer portal last year. What's that you say? The only WR they went out and got was Northwestern's 6th team WR? Yup, and Gill, who couldn't see the field at lowly Northwestern, is Iowa's #1 receiver, averaging just 2.5 catches per game for 169 yards in 6 games. Where does that rank him compared with the rest of the Big 10's receivers? Hard to say because they only list the top 50, and Gill isn't even close to making the list. That means most teams have 3 WRs more productive than Iowa's #1 WR.

4. TE: C-. Tight End U. Who needs average wide receivers when Iowa has its TE NFL pipeline, right? With "all-American and likely 1st round draft pick Luke Lachey" healthy and playing every down, the Hawks will be in good shape. Or not. Halfway through the year and Lachey has just 156 yards, 0 touchdowns. Ostrenga has been a good backup, but he has just 63 receiving yards this year. By comparison, Penn State's TE has 40 catches for 525 yards an 4 touchdowns. Purdue's TE has 352 yards and 2 tds. Michigan's tight end has 30 catches. Washington, Oregon, and Rutgers all have TEs with over 20 catches and Michigan State's TE has over 240 yards. All are putting up better stats than any TE on Iowa's roster...despite all having a better WR room to share passes with. Hawk fans considered Lachey a lock for 1st team all-Big 10 and it's looking like he won't even make honorable mention.

5. OL: B-. The OL seems to be a tale of two skill sets. They can be road graders in the run game, but their pass protection is awful. Iowa has more starts on the OLine than any team in the country. Kirk touts himself as an OL guru. So why isn't Iowa's OL a strength this year? Despite not throwing much, the Hawks are 9th in sacks allowed (1.5 sacks per game). That number is deceptive, as Cade rarely steps back in the pocket to launch deep balls. Similarly, despite Johnson being an elite yards after contact back, Iowa ranks 8th in tackles for loss allowed. The worst part is...the cupboard looks to be bare next year with everyone other than Dunker graduating.

6. K: A. Drew Stevens is the most underrated weapon on the team. The guy gets zero hype, yet he's the Big 10's #2 rated kicker, nailing 10 of 11 field goals this year, many at long range. Sure, we all remember the misses, and his 1 miss against Ohio State was a dagger to the heart, but Stevens is an elite college kicker that deserves more praise than he gets.
 
Last edited:
The schedule is arguably the biggest factor this season. Iowa plays one good team in conference and got demolished; one pretender in noncon and lost a close one.
The rest of the schedule is mediocre to terrible. Only 2 decent teams left (wisky and nebby) neither of which is more than a middling also ran. And they get both of them at home.
 
Spot on post - I really can't figure out our dismal WR room, yeah I get that some of it ties back to our horrible QB and OL (pass blocking) play. Just when I thought that Anderson might be OK, he proceeds to drop one that hit his chest. I have been a big fan of Gill, but it is sad that he is our best WR and he was cast off from a Northwestern program....:rolleyes: I thought Washington was going to be viable option at WR/Slot, so now he is back to RB? I do think Lester HAS to get the ball in Wetjen's hands as much as possible - and I do see this happening more, which is encouraging.
 
We are already at the midpoint in the season! The Hawks sit at 4-2 with a pretty favorable schedule still ahead. It's been an up and down year, with Iowa looking as bad as they've ever looked last week followed by the best offensive performance in recent memory against a rebuilding Washington team. So how have the position groups performed when compared with expectations and the rest of the 18 team Big 10 conference?

1. QB: D-. Iowa sits at 17th of 18 Big 10 teams in passing offense. That's REAL bad. Cade McNamara, Jon Budmeyer's highest profile recruit and the Swarm's largest financial investment...sits at 16th in the conference in yards per game at just 132. Sadly, his yards per attempt ranks even worse (DEAD LAST among Big 10 QBs). The numbers are especially bad because several of Cade's 1 yard passes that Kirk himself could have completed were extended 20+ yards by virtue of having an all-American running back who can turn a 1 yard gain into a 20 yard gain. Even Cade's completion percentage on his exclusively short passes is near the bottom of the Big 10 at just 63%. By comparison, five QBs in the conference are well above 70%. QB play is the weakest link on the entire team and no one other than Kirk Ferentz would give Cade a better grade than D-.

2. RB: A+. Unexpectedly, the Hawkeyes rank #1 in the Big 10 in rushing offense. That's unheard of. Despite coming into the season as Iowa's 3rd string RB, Kaleb Johnson ranks #1 in the Big 10 in yards per game, yards per carry, and touchdowns! Pretty amazing considering all the RB talent out there. If the Hawks had simply blocked Iowa State's lucky 54 yrd field goal, Johnson would be on everyone's radar as a Heisman contender. And while second stringer Moulton isn't setting the world on fire, he ranks 4th among Big 10 freshmen in yards per game, so the future is bright at the position.

3. WR: F. Sadly, the running joke about Iowa's WR group being the worst in college football will now continue for a 6th consecutive year. Gone is undertalented & undersized 5 year starter Ragaini, and in comes a new crop of WR recruits no other Power 5 program wanted. Iowa's one playmaker, their 4 star WR OSU transfer Brown, found himself in Kirk's doghouse and bolted mid-season after only catching 1 ball all year. Iowa's #2 receiver, Anderson, has been hurt with a mysterious injury that has lingered for 2 years and has caught a grand total of 1 ball all season. Wetjen, the fastest and most dynamic player on the roster...1 catch all year. Many were high on Buie & Howard returning this year, yet they have a combined...3 catches. With so many recruiting misses, the Hawks are left using the WR talent pulled from the transfer portal last year. What's that you say? The only WR they went out and got was Northwestern's 6th team WR? Yup, and Gill, who couldn't see the field at lowly Northwestern, is Iowa's #1 receiver, averaging just 2.5 catches per game for 169 yards in 6 games. Where does that rank him compared with the rest of the Big 10's receivers? Hard to say because they only list the top 50, and Gill isn't even close to making the list. That means most teams have 3 WRs more productive than Iowa's #1 WR.

4. TE: C-. Tight End U. Who needs average wide receivers when Iowa has its TE NFL pipeline, right? With "all-American and likely 1st round draft pick Luke Lachey" healthy and playing every down, the Hawks will be in good shape. Or not. Halfway through the year and Lachey has just 156 yards, 0 touchdowns. Ostrenga has been a good backup, but he has just 63 receiving yards this year. By comparison, Penn State's TE has 40 catches for 525 yards an 4 touchdowns. Purdue's TE has 352 yards and 2 tds. Michigan's tight end has 30 catches. Washington, Oregon, and Rutgers all have TEs with over 20 catches and Michigan State's TE has over 240 yards. All are putting up better stats than any TE on Iowa's roster...despite all having a better WR room to share passes with. Hawk fans considered Lachey a lock for 1st team all-Big 10 and it's looking like he won't even make honorable mention.

5. OL: B-. The OL seems to be a tale of two skill sets. They can be road graders in the run game, but their pass protection is awful. Iowa has more starts on the OLine than any team in the country. Kirk touts himself as an OL guru. So why isn't Iowa's OL a strength this year? Despite not throwing much, the Hawks are 9th in sacks allowed (1.5 sacks per game). That number is deceptive, as Cade rarely steps back in the pocket to launch deep balls. Similarly, despite Johnson being an elite yards after contact back, Iowa ranks 8th in tackles for loss allowed. The worst part is...the cupboard looks to be bare next year with everyone other than Dunker graduating.

6. K: A. Drew Stevens is the most underrated weapon on the team. The guy gets zero hype, yet he's the Big 10's #2 rated kicker, nailing 10 of 11 field goals this year, many at long range. Sure, we all remember the misses, and his 1 miss against Ohio State was a dagger to the heart, but Stevens is an elite college kicker that deserves more praise than he gets.
objective? time to use the other word
 
Running game A+
Passing game D

In B1G games + ISU, Iowa has faced four top 15 defenses (total yards). All 4 teams are also in the Top 15 in passing yards allowed.

Nebraska is the only one left on the schedule in the top 15 (#13) in total yards allowed (#31 in passing yards)

MSU is #37 in total yards, #47 in passing yards.

It's probably wishful thinking, but maybe the passing game will come around this weekend and for the remainder of the year.
 
The schedule is arguably the biggest factor this season. Iowa plays one good team in conference and got demolished; one pretender in noncon and lost a close one.
The rest of the schedule is mediocre to terrible. Only 2 decent teams left (wisky and nebby) neither of which is more than a middling also ran. And they get both of them at home.
The Big 10 baby whatever KF is doing to or with them, keep it up. Not that it will matter next year. Schedule isn't awful compared to other teams. Plus, Big 10 is making is clear, you sissy's from out west are not beating our big bad tough boys from the midwest. They are all getting the Nebraska treatment for the old guard. Hilarious watching it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garzatough85
We are already at the midpoint in the season! The Hawks sit at 4-2 with a pretty favorable schedule still ahead. It's been an up and down year, with Iowa looking as bad as they've ever looked last week followed by the best offensive performance in recent memory against a rebuilding Washington team. So how have the position groups performed when compared with expectations and the rest of the 18 team Big 10 conference?

1. QB: D-. Iowa sits at 17th of 18 Big 10 teams in passing offense. That's REAL bad. Cade McNamara, Jon Budmeyer's highest profile recruit and the Swarm's largest financial investment...sits at 16th in the conference in yards per game at just 132. Sadly, his yards per attempt ranks even worse (DEAD LAST among Big 10 QBs). The numbers are especially bad because several of Cade's 1 yard passes that Kirk himself could have completed were extended 20+ yards by virtue of having an all-American running back who can turn a 1 yard gain into a 20 yard gain. Even Cade's completion percentage on his exclusively short passes is near the bottom of the Big 10 at just 63%. By comparison, five QBs in the conference are well above 70%. QB play is the weakest link on the entire team and no one other than Kirk Ferentz would give Cade a better grade than D-.

2. RB: A+. Unexpectedly, the Hawkeyes rank #1 in the Big 10 in rushing offense. That's unheard of. Despite coming into the season as Iowa's 3rd string RB, Kaleb Johnson ranks #1 in the Big 10 in yards per game, yards per carry, and touchdowns! Pretty amazing considering all the RB talent out there. If the Hawks had simply blocked Iowa State's lucky 54 yrd field goal, Johnson would be on everyone's radar as a Heisman contender. And while second stringer Moulton isn't setting the world on fire, he ranks 4th among Big 10 freshmen in yards per game, so the future is bright at the position.

3. WR: F. Sadly, the running joke about Iowa's WR group being the worst in college football will now continue for a 6th consecutive year. Gone is undertalented & undersized 5 year starter Ragaini, and in comes a new crop of WR recruits no other Power 5 program wanted. Iowa's one playmaker, their 4 star WR OSU transfer Brown, found himself in Kirk's doghouse and bolted mid-season after only catching 1 ball all year. Iowa's #2 receiver, Anderson, has been hurt with a mysterious injury that has lingered for 2 years and has caught a grand total of 1 ball all season. Wetjen, the fastest and most dynamic player on the roster...1 catch all year. Many were high on Buie & Howard returning this year, yet they have a combined...3 catches. With so many recruiting misses, the Hawks are left using the WR talent pulled from the transfer portal last year. What's that you say? The only WR they went out and got was Northwestern's 6th team WR? Yup, and Gill, who couldn't see the field at lowly Northwestern, is Iowa's #1 receiver, averaging just 2.5 catches per game for 169 yards in 6 games. Where does that rank him compared with the rest of the Big 10's receivers? Hard to say because they only list the top 50, and Gill isn't even close to making the list. That means most teams have 3 WRs more productive than Iowa's #1 WR.

4. TE: C-. Tight End U. Who needs average wide receivers when Iowa has its TE NFL pipeline, right? With "all-American and likely 1st round draft pick Luke Lachey" healthy and playing every down, the Hawks will be in good shape. Or not. Halfway through the year and Lachey has just 156 yards, 0 touchdowns. Ostrenga has been a good backup, but he has just 63 receiving yards this year. By comparison, Penn State's TE has 40 catches for 525 yards an 4 touchdowns. Purdue's TE has 352 yards and 2 tds. Michigan's tight end has 30 catches. Washington, Oregon, and Rutgers all have TEs with over 20 catches and Michigan State's TE has over 240 yards. All are putting up better stats than any TE on Iowa's roster...despite all having a better WR room to share passes with. Hawk fans considered Lachey a lock for 1st team all-Big 10 and it's looking like he won't even make honorable mention.

5. OL: B-. The OL seems to be a tale of two skill sets. They can be road graders in the run game, but their pass protection is awful. Iowa has more starts on the OLine than any team in the country. Kirk touts himself as an OL guru. So why isn't Iowa's OL a strength this year? Despite not throwing much, the Hawks are 9th in sacks allowed (1.5 sacks per game). That number is deceptive, as Cade rarely steps back in the pocket to launch deep balls. Similarly, despite Johnson being an elite yards after contact back, Iowa ranks 8th in tackles for loss allowed. The worst part is...the cupboard looks to be bare next year with everyone other than Dunker graduating.

6. K: A. Drew Stevens is the most underrated weapon on the team. The guy gets zero hype, yet he's the Big 10's #2 rated kicker, nailing 10 of 11 field goals this year, many at long range. Sure, we all remember the misses, and his 1 miss against Ohio State was a dagger to the heart, but Stevens is an elite college kicker that deserves more praise than he gets.
Law - how bad do you it will be next year and the following? Losing the whole roster, that still cannot compete with good teams and the schedule, while still easy compared to others, gets somewhat tougher. Think KF leaves after this false season and leaves the next guy with the upcoming mess. With this O and lack of talent, you are looking at 3-9 or worse, unless Albany and Maine are really bad.
the running back can't be an A+ with a B- oline. Not how football works... unless you are barry sanders. Johnson is no barry sanders.
Law - how bad do you it will be next year and the following? Losing the whole roster, that still cannot compete with good teams and the schedule, while still easy compared to others, gets somewhat tougher. Think KF leaves after this false season and leaves the next guy with the upcoming mess. With this O and lack of talent, you are looking at 3-9 or worse, unless Albany and Maine are really bad.
 
I think Gill, Howard, Wetjen, Anderson, and Vander Zee could be very good WRs IF they had someone capable of throwing them the ball. Sullivan probably could do it, but the angles from the bench are tough, and the windows are extremely tight.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HawkOn15
Ok Kirk.......until they play a top 25 team and get trucked.........every.......single.......time. Honestly, defensive coordinators who are getting ready to play the Hawks essentially have a week off prior to the game, it is like another bye week for defensive coaches. They didn't even score a point on a ranked team last year..........Not good enough.
 
Our receivers (or the receivers' coach doesn't teach it) can't figure out how to get separation and/or catch the ball through contact like some other receivers have done in the past.
 
Plus, Big 10 is making is clear, you sissy's from out west are not beating our big bad tough boys from the midwest. They are all getting the Nebraska treatment for the old guard. Hilarious watching it.
Did Washington not just beat Michigan? Did Oregon not just beat OSU? UCLA sucks but that’s nothing new and USC is very Jekyll and Hyde this season. I like having the PAC teams and think there will be some great games in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: littlez
before the game they had on the screen the draft picks of the KF era===looking back at 02-04 and the talent we had recruited it is no wonder we do not compete well against the cream anymore--
same with the 08-10 era.

really need to step up recruiting so might need ot replace a couple of coaches to get some in here that can recruit---hell Bielema recruited Florida way better than the tandem we have going there now and he was from Ill and had never coached down there....
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCHawkeye99
I think this means you take exception to these grades due to the record. Iowa does find ways to win ugly games more often than not. The good news is we like to make games ugly. The saddest truth in these grades are they are statistically accurate and also point to missed opportunities due to missed open receivers and/or bad throws when opportunities are there. Hence; Cades rating is as low as it is due to whatever he’s lost over the last few years in arm strength and ability extending plays.
 
Yeah but you're also Britt, West Hancock fan. You would like any midterm grade that favored the running game, and dismissed everything else. ;)
I actually am a proponent of wide open spread style passing attacks. That is no secret on here.
At the post-HS level, it's a must to prevent box loading.
I used to keep on harping about going to spread offenses on here, but gave it up due to preaching to a wall.

With that said, our mighty Wing-T works (quite) well as we run it to perfection.
That is essentially what our players run from grade school level.
It also is literally the offense the entire coaching staff grew up with so they KNOW the Wing-T inside and out.
For obvious reasons (7-0) we will rely on our ground game until The Abyss freezes over.
 
You’re bringing up football from 46 years ago and comparing it to today?Really?
No I am not comparing football from 46 years ago to today. I am saying if you can run the ball effectively passing yards are not as important. That was true 46 years ago as Alabama proved and is still true today.
 
I actually am a proponent of wide open spread style passing attacks. That is no secret on here.
At the post-HS level, it's a must to prevent box loading.
I used to keep on harping about going to spread offenses on here, but gave it up due to preaching to a wall.

With that said, our mighty Wing-T works (quite) well as we run it to perfection.
That is essentially what our players run from grade school level.
It also is literally the offense the entire coaching staff grew up with so they KNOW the Wing-T inside and out.
For obvious reasons (7-0) we will rely on our ground game until The Abyss freezes over.
It truly doesn't matter what kind of offense you run if you have the elite athletes to run it, but the spread best utilizes the best athletes' speed and playmaking ability.

It's when you get into the weeds of all the other programs in that middle tier where you can win with a variety of offenses, and don't necessarily need to do what the top programs are doing to win.

Probably near and dear to your heart, Army and Navy have ""unique"" offenses to compared to all these modern programs, and it's a struggle and an adjustment for many to have to spend time away from what everyone else is doing to prepare for the run-heavy triple option of the academies.

I've felt for some time now that the offense that best fits what Iowa wants to do fundamentally, while also allowing us a bit more freedom to join the 21st Century in terms of playing faster, more in space, and more diverse is some variation of the Pistol Offense.

You still have the PA option, it's a run-friendly offense, and it highly encourages you to have a mobile QB, which is what people have been clamoring for since Brad Banks, though it's not a fatal flaw if you don't.

I absolutely wanted to rip my TV off its stand and hug it when I saw Iowa line up with Sullivan in the Pistol for our Goal Line Package that first time against Troy.
 
It truly doesn't matter what kind of offense you run if you have the elite athletes to run it, but the spread best utilizes the best athletes' speed and playmaking ability.

It's when you get into the weeds of all the other programs in that middle tier where you can win with a variety of offenses, and don't necessarily need to do what the top programs are doing to win.

Probably near and dear to your heart, Army and Navy have ""unique"" offenses to compared to all these modern programs, and it's a struggle and an adjustment for many to have to spend time away from what everyone else is doing to prepare for the run-heavy triple option of the academies.

I've felt for some time now that the offense that best fits what Iowa wants to do fundamentally, while also allowing us a bit more freedom to join the 21st Century in terms of playing faster, more in space, and more diverse is some variation of the Pistol Offense.

You still have the PA option, it's a run-friendly offense, and it highly encourages you to have a mobile QB, which is what people have been clamoring for since Brad Banks, though it's not a fatal flaw if you don't.

I absolutely wanted to rip my TV off its stand and hug it when I saw Iowa line up with Sullivan in the Pistol for our Goal Line Package that first time against Troy.
Regarding the Army & Navy teams, I could survive with the old East Waterloo Wishbone offense.
It couldn't be stopped for years (literally).
Of course it helped having Jerry Moses and Norm Montgomery.
 
Ok Kirk.......until they play a top 25 team and get trucked.........every.......single.......time. Honestly, defensive coordinators who are getting ready to play the Hawks essentially have a week off prior to the game, it is like another bye week for defensive coaches. They didn't even score a point on a ranked team last year..........Not good enough.
I think this means you take exception to these grades due to the record. Iowa does find ways to win ugly games more often than not. The good news is we like to make games ugly. The saddest truth in these grades are they are statistically accurate and also point to missed opportunities due to missed open receivers and/or bad throws when opportunities are there. Hence; Cades rating is as low as it is due to whatever he’s lost over the last few years in arm strength and ability extending plays.
No, 4-2 is my grade for Iowa's offense on its mid-season report card
 
The schedule is arguably the biggest factor this season. Iowa plays one good team in conference and got demolished; one pretender in noncon and lost a close one.
The rest of the schedule is mediocre to terrible. Only 2 decent teams left (wisky and nebby) neither of which is more than a middling also ran. And they get both of them at home.
Jeeeebus keeeerist….”one pretender in non-con”…. How much does it physically hurt to admit Iowa State has a pretty good football team this season? Do you understand how infantile this makes you/ Iowa fan base sound?
Sometimes you just have to tip your hat and smile. It really doesn’t hurt.
 
Our receivers (or the receivers' coach doesn't teach it) can't figure out how to get separation and/or catch the ball through contact like some other receivers have done in the past.
With the exception of Gill…and I’d throw in Wetjen too.😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: DEMGR
It truly doesn't matter what kind of offense you run if you have the elite athletes to run it, but the spread best utilizes the best athletes' speed and playmaking ability.

It's when you get into the weeds of all the other programs in that middle tier where you can win with a variety of offenses, and don't necessarily need to do what the top programs are doing to win.

Probably near and dear to your heart, Army and Navy have ""unique"" offenses to compared to all these modern programs, and it's a struggle and an adjustment for many to have to spend time away from what everyone else is doing to prepare for the run-heavy triple option of the academies.

I've felt for some time now that the offense that best fits what Iowa wants to do fundamentally, while also allowing us a bit more freedom to join the 21st Century in terms of playing faster, more in space, and more diverse is some variation of the Pistol Offense.

You still have the PA option, it's a run-friendly offense, and it highly encourages you to have a mobile QB, which is what people have been clamoring for since Brad Banks, though it's not a fatal flaw if you don't.

I absolutely wanted to rip my TV off its stand and hug it when I saw Iowa line up with Sullivan in the Pistol for our Goal Line Package that first time against Troy.
Spot on Evil! I’d welcome an offense that mimics the academies…👍
 
I think Gill, Howard, Wetjen, Anderson, and Vander Zee could be very good WRs IF they had someone capable of throwing them the ball. Sullivan probably could do it, but the angles from the bench are tough, and the windows are extremely tight.
I think VZ just needs a year to bulk up and I am not sold on Anderson (not enough data). As for the others, IMHO I’d say ‘Good’. Which is a giant leap forward from years past…Wetjen would still be running if Cade would have hit him in stride…or just hit him anywhere!🤪
 
I agree with all of your grades except WR. It’s probably splitting hairs as we are still poor, but last year was generationally bad. We completed less then 50% and averaged about half as many TD’s. Ragaini and Brown were the only decent options.

This year admittedly is not tons better but Gill and Vanderzee are a clear upgrade from where we were.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rambler Hawk
I think 2 military schools are ranked and they run the ball almost all the time.
They’re also not running traditional pro style offense. Flexbone triple option. Kirks not switching from what he wants to run, good, bad or indifferent.
 
I agree with all of your grades except WR. It’s probably splitting hairs as we are still poor, but last year was generationally bad. We completed less then 50% and averaged about half as many TD’s. Ragaini and Brown were the only decent options.

This year admittedly is not tons better but Gill and Vanderzee are a clear upgrade from where we were.
Agree. His grade was too low. Cade has missed some open wide receivers. I think they deserve a D.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT