@BirdistheWord - if Deacon Hill, a DIII quarterback, is the standard by which you hold Big 10 quarterbacks on Top 25 teams, you're probably going to want to raise your standards.
@Beattheohiostate - notwithstanding the name that sets you up for a lifetime of misery, you are spot on. The Hawks stand virtually zero chance at beating a team like OSU with a hobbled, weak armed QB given Iowa's OL play. The only chance at an upset is to hand over the keys to Sullivan, at least for this game, to move the pocket and make plays with his feet & arm (as opposed to Cade...who has one attribute...confidence).
@desihawk - alas, any Hawk fan who dared to critique Kirk or his boy wonder over the years is labeled a "Cyclone fan" or "Nebraska fan" regardless of whether they have ever watched a single one of their games.
@Rambler Hawk - I could do an entire post on the WR play. From the lack of snaps for Iowa's best WR threats (Brown & Wetjen running a combined 5 routes...while a true freshmen with butter fingers starts and plays the entire game) to the lack of play calling designed for WRs, I wouldn't know where to begin.
@DJ_Kool_Herk - finally, someone gets it! The key to success is and has always been about limiting randying around on offense and defense.
@Old Uncle Teddy - I hope you're right that the most stubborn man in football has suddenly changed his philosophy on quarterback seniority being the be all end all in playing time and that he actually takes performance into consideration following the Ohio State game.