ADVERTISEMENT

Iowa's cost for health insurance for kids to balloon from $7 million to $37 million

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,534
59,030
113
Thanks Republicans!:

It’s about to cost Iowa a lot more to provide health insurance to 70,000 children from moderate-income families.

The state’s share of the cost for kids in the HAWK-I program is set to more than quintuple in the next two years, from $7 million to $37 million. Iowa legislators, who already face tight budgets, will have to find that money to keep the popular program going.

What caused this problem? Congress.

The future of HAWK-I and similar programs across the country was in doubt last winter, as Congress let the programs' federal funding lapse during a contentious attempt to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

In January, after a brief federal shutdown, Congress agreed to extend the children’s health insurance programs for six more years. But Congress also decided to phase out extra federal financing for the programs, which had been included in the Affordable Care Act.

The result is that states will have to shoulder much more of the cost. Iowa’s share will jump from 5 percent this fiscal year to 13 percent next fiscal year and 24 percent the year after that, according to the Iowa Department of Human Services.

The national program started in 1997, with bipartisan support in Congress and from then-President Bill Clinton. The program, known nationally as CHIP, has helped slash the uninsured rate among U.S. children from 14 percent to just 4 percent. In Iowa, the current rate is about 3 percent.

The Child and Family Policy Center of Iowa, which tracks the issue, said the increased state costs were expected because of last January's Congressional action.

"There’s no doubt Iowa will feel that in its budget. Having said that, CHIP remains a good deal for the state — and a lifeline for families who make too much to be eligible for Medicaid, but too little to afford private insurance," said Anne Discher, executive director for the group.

Discher said federal law bans states from tightening their eligibility rules in response to the cut in federal money for the children's health insurance programs.

Under Iowa rules, a family of four may qualify for HAWK-I coverage for their children if the family's annual income is between about $42,000 and $76,000. Applicants must be residents of Iowa and either U.S. citizens or legal immigrants, and they must not be offered other types of health insurance.

Legislators also must find more state money to support the much larger Medicaid program, which is for poor and disabled Iowans. The state share of costs for that program is projected to climb from $1.374 billion this fiscal year to $1.476 billion two years from now.

Iowa's Medicaid program and the HAWK-I program are being run by national management companies.

https://www.press-citizen.com/story...rnment-kids-coverage-budget-state/2269577002/
 
Thanks Republicans!:

It’s about to cost Iowa a lot more to provide health insurance to 70,000 children from moderate-income families.

The state’s share of the cost for kids in the HAWK-I program is set to more than quintuple in the next two years, from $7 million to $37 million. Iowa legislators, who already face tight budgets, will have to find that money to keep the popular program going.

What caused this problem? Congress.

The future of HAWK-I and similar programs across the country was in doubt last winter, as Congress let the programs' federal funding lapse during a contentious attempt to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

In January, after a brief federal shutdown, Congress agreed to extend the children’s health insurance programs for six more years. But Congress also decided to phase out extra federal financing for the programs, which had been included in the Affordable Care Act.

The result is that states will have to shoulder much more of the cost. Iowa’s share will jump from 5 percent this fiscal year to 13 percent next fiscal year and 24 percent the year after that, according to the Iowa Department of Human Services.

The national program started in 1997, with bipartisan support in Congress and from then-President Bill Clinton. The program, known nationally as CHIP, has helped slash the uninsured rate among U.S. children from 14 percent to just 4 percent. In Iowa, the current rate is about 3 percent.

The Child and Family Policy Center of Iowa, which tracks the issue, said the increased state costs were expected because of last January's Congressional action.

"There’s no doubt Iowa will feel that in its budget. Having said that, CHIP remains a good deal for the state — and a lifeline for families who make too much to be eligible for Medicaid, but too little to afford private insurance," said Anne Discher, executive director for the group.

Discher said federal law bans states from tightening their eligibility rules in response to the cut in federal money for the children's health insurance programs.

Under Iowa rules, a family of four may qualify for HAWK-I coverage for their children if the family's annual income is between about $42,000 and $76,000. Applicants must be residents of Iowa and either U.S. citizens or legal immigrants, and they must not be offered other types of health insurance.

Legislators also must find more state money to support the much larger Medicaid program, which is for poor and disabled Iowans. The state share of costs for that program is projected to climb from $1.374 billion this fiscal year to $1.476 billion two years from now.

Iowa's Medicaid program and the HAWK-I program are being run by national management companies.

https://www.press-citizen.com/story...rnment-kids-coverage-budget-state/2269577002/

I can guarantee I can find a post from you where you bemoaned the plight of the children and how we should do this for them. Now you bitch about how it costs to much?

Yeah that is the real world, I think most of us tried to explain this to you the first time around.
 
I can guarantee I can find a post from you where you bemoaned the plight of the children and how we should do this for them. Now you bitch about how it costs to much?

Yeah that is the real world, I think most of us tried to explain this to you the first time around.
Reotto...is that what Ciggy is complaining about here? I think he is talking about how Congress walked away from its responsibility here...and basically mandated the costs back on the states. Tax cuts you know. ;)
 
Reotto...is that what Ciggy is complaining about here? I think he is talking about how Congress walked away from its responsibility here...and basically mandated the costs back on the states. Tax cuts you know. ;)

I will agree with you, but we ALL discussed that on here on how the burden for Obamacare was going to switch to the states and at the start it was only feeder money.

It is not tax cuts, this was absolutely part of the plan to start with it.

They were transparent about it even, and many of those on the left just shrugged and said no big deal.

Evidently most people do not know or understand what the biggest expenses in state budgets were before Obamacare.

So back to my point, you can't push for Obamacare, bleeding heart it and say what about all the children that "deserve" health care and then be outraged when state bills come due with the fed starts phasing out the money they said they would put to it.

Tax cuts is a complete and utter BS response.

This was planned from the start, and one thing that cons screamed about along with Obamacare taxing people for 10 years to pay for only 8.

Screaming about it now is disingenuous at best.

Honestly, you have to be kidding me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeyHawk
The important thing is after the tax cuts corporations plowed their share into employee dividends, and creating high paying jobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I will agree with you, but we ALL discussed that on here on how the burden for Obamacare was going to switch to the states and at the start it was only feeder money.

Only because Congress REFUSED to consider/negotiate the "public option" portion of ObamaCare. And it was a particular sector of Congress that refused....House Republicans.
 

Well aren’t you full of shit.

It is the Republicans fault for not expanding the program that the Dems put in during the secret of the night? Give me a break.
 
Well aren’t you full of shit.

It is the Republicans fault for not expanding the program that the Dems put in during the secret of the night? Give me a break.

Well, I am not. The GOP informed Dems that Obamacare was DOA if there was a "public option" attached"....
The GOP understood that ObamaCare would have succeeded if there was a {public option" passed in the bill....and McConnell had promised his herd that his mission was to make sure Obama failed at every turn legislatively. So reotto...I am NOT wrong here. Sorry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
This will be a good thing,... Iowans will have an opportunity to decide how much of this program is needed and affordable,... It's easy to spend federal money since most of it comes from somewhere else...
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT