ADVERTISEMENT

Is ActBlue a Money Laundering Front for Democrats?

I didn’t see a question. So, even if all of her statements are true, why does Elon need to hide the $100 million investment. Remember this when you MAGAs bitch about Soros.
You'd think Harris campaign would appreciate someone else spending $100 million dollars to get her positions out there to the public.
 
I didn't realize he was hiding who he supports.
If you read the thread of tweets, it wasn’t readily apparent. Same as it wasn’t in 2020, which the WSJ traced back about $50 million in another string of advertisements.
 
If you read the thread of tweets, it wasn’t readily apparent. Same as it wasn’t in 2020, which the WSJ traced back about $50 million in another string of advertisements.
Well maybe someone will stop him from ::checks notes:: publicizing Harris' positions.
 


The answer is still yes btw
A lot of people probably won't click that link and see the text:

BREAKING: Wisconsin Judge Brad Schimel has approved a subpoena against ActBlue, saying, "Something is NOT right" after hearing evidence that ActBlue is using the names of unsuspecting people to launder dark money to Democrat campaigns.

“There may be an element of fraud, or maybe it is innocent. Plaintiff has set forth enough in their complaint and in support of their subpoena to demonstrate that there may be something here.

Mark Block, a Wisconsin Republican, sued ActBlue after discovering that his identity was used to make donations to Democrats, including at least 385 donations worth $884.38 to the Harris Victory Fund and other left-wing committees. In his lawsuit, he sought a subpoena demanding the production of all evidence of how that happened.

ActBlue resisted the subpoena, and the judge saw right through it, “I don’t get why there is — why that is causing such substantial resistance to sharing it."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scruddy
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT