The fact that you ask that question shows the partisan ignorance oozing from you.How so?
The fact that you ask that question shows the partisan ignorance oozing from you.How so?
Can Biden declare Netanyahu and Galant personae non gratae and deny them entry into the US?
General entry to most of the US, yes.Can Biden declare Netanyahu and Galant personae non gratae and deny them entry into the US?
How about warrants for Hamas leadership, like those in Qatar?Can Biden declare Netanyahu and Galant personae non gratae and deny them entry into the US?
If so, he should.
Have any of the 3 international tribunals issued warrants yet? We may not be signatories to the ICC or ICJ but that doesn't mean we can't act on their warrants, does it?
He theoretically could deny him entry to JFK, Manhattan, and the Extraterritorial Zone, but that would throw the UN into chaos.
I mean having the United Nations in your country is such a power move. Not to mention by having it we prevent other nations from beating us in Civ with a Diplomatic Victory.Do you really believe we would notice a difference?...
I was only talking about when they come to the US, but if you want to arrest Netanyahu and Galant on foreign soil, I'm down with that; and, absolutely, grab the Hamas criminals, too.How about warrants for Hamas leadership, like those in Qatar?
The Yom Kippur War was 1973.You should have an option that says, "Israel is no more or less a pariah state than they were 50 fifty years ago, regardless of whether their actions are justified."
The Yom Kippur War was 1973.
I don't see how anyone can equate Israel then with what Israel is doing and has become today.
I strongly disagree.I think you may be asking a different question than you intended.
I'm not saying Israel has the same moral justification for what they are doing in Gaza as they did in the Yom Kippur War.
There have always been countries who refused diplomatic relations with Israel. Young people and the political left have always been critical of Israel.
It was like this 20 years ago, 20 years before that, and so on. I'm just saying that Israel is no more a pariah state than they were 50 years ago.
But just out of curiosity, do you think they were a pariah state then and now, or not a pariah state then and now?
Has been since its inception.I strongly disagree.
But just out of curiosity, do you think they were a pariah state then and now, or not a pariah state then and now?
Dunno.
That conflict seems intractable.
I strongly disagree.
But just out of curiosity, do you think they were a pariah state then and now, or not a pariah state then and now?
Vietnam, though the use of "war" is kind of a stretch since we didn't officially declare war. That was an instance where the US should have either been 100% committed, or stayed out entirely. Nearly 60K troops lost their lives because we pussyfooted around too much (yes, we underestimated the North Vietnamese too).Name onw single war where the "bad" guys won.
History is written by the Victors.
Apples and oranges IMHO. South Carolina (not to mention every other ex-Confederate and border states) either regained or retained their voice in Washington after the war. Now, I'd imagine there'd have been some violence for many, many decades had the Union flexed their muscles by keeping former slave states as part of its official jurisdiction, but relegating their status to that of Puerto Rico (i.e. no representation in the House or Senate).It would be like South Carolina continuing to attack the Union 40 years after the Civil War.
IMHO.