ADVERTISEMENT

Israeli "Surprise" Against Iran

To WWJD and Ree or whoever, what was Israel's response supposed to be in your opinion? Nothing but talks? What would the US's or UK's or any other super power's response to that type of scenario have been?
Nobody has said Israel should have done nothing.

What do you think constitutes a proportional, just response? A week of slaughter? A month of slaughter? Six months of slaughter? A year of slaughter?

Stop me when you think the slaughter should stop.

I may have been too early in calling for the slaughter to stop in some people's eyes, but everybody who still defends Israeli slaughter at this point in time is way too late in my eyes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and SI_NYC
Obviously most of these posters have zero biblical knowledge. It's never going to end. Maybe temporary peace at times. But the hate is real. No Peace until Jesus returns and cleans the mess up.
Maybe he doesn’t have any ideas and that’s why he started the thread.
 
Nobody has said Israel should have done nothing.

What do you think constitutes a proportional, just response? A week of slaughter? A month of slaughter? Six months of slaughter? A year of slaughter?

Stop me when you think the slaughter should stop.

I may have been too early in calling for the slaughter to stop in some people's eyes, but everybody who still defends Israeli slaughter at this point in time is way too late in my eyes.

Proportional response? Examples of wars won with ‘proportional response’?

When one side introduces war, they’ve invited slaughter until they renounce war.

I’m still waiting to hear the terms you wanted to offer the Nazis, and how early.
 
Probably but I’m just saying my side of the aisle gets called pro-Hamas anytime we sympathize with the Palestinian people. There are next to no democrats who are on the side of terrorists. I’m really damn liberal now but I HATE terrorists. I’m probably pretty right leaning when it comes to dealing with them and Iran.

I don’t consider the Palestinians = Hamas, but I do consider them sympathizers at worst. I also believe the other Arab people have basically turned their backs on them. Palestinians aren’t welcome anywhere else.

I don’t think the Israelis and Hamas are similar, as one side is a functioning country and the other is a terrorist organization masquerading as a government, when they are willing to sacrifice the Palestinians to achieve the total annihilation of Israel. I believe there are other countries that feel the same.
 
Israel needs to do whatever they need to do to protect themselves. Palestinians in Israel can either assimilate or go away.

If Israel needs to attack Iran to accomplish their goal of survival then so be it.

All you assholes discussing proportional response don't quite get it. A proportional response would be from the river to the sea equivalence. Want to guess what that means?
 
Nobody has said Israel should have done nothing.

What do you think constitutes a proportional, just response? A week of slaughter? A month of slaughter? Six months of slaughter? A year of slaughter?

Stop me when you think the slaughter should stop.

I may have been too early in calling for the slaughter to stop in some people's eyes, but everybody who still defends Israeli slaughter at this point in time is way too late in my eyes.

You edited out a lot of my post, I know it was long, but I came into the thread two pages in, and hit a lot of topics at once, otherwise it would have derailed into many tangents, such as this.

With your edit of my post, conveniently flipping the question I posed to you and Ree back to me without answering it yourself btw, one thing that could have possibly curtailed some of the innocent casualties would have been the return of ALL of the also INNOCENT hostages Hamas took on 10/7, as Israel stated. Then they would have been open to peace talks. That never happened, but what did happen instead was the Iranian proxies ramped up attacks on Israel by air and at sea, thinking that Israel was weaker and more vulnerable than they were, and that the US and their Western allies were too spread out in Ukraine to offer as much support. This is Iran vs Israel, not Palestine or Lebanon, it’s just that the people in those countries are caught in the crossfire (not going to debate that the Palestinians allowed them into power, because it’s not that simple) and that’s the reality of these scenarios, which truly sucks. Read what Michael Herzog, Israel’s envoy in Washington said yesterday, literally saying Israel’s enemies “smelled blood” and sensed vulnerability. So no, this isn’t Israel wiping out a bunch of innocent people, Hamas/Hezbollah/Iran is as much or more to blame for what happened, but plays the “good guy” card while pointing fingers at “evil” Israel when they attack them, completely ignoring the fact they were hiding among innocent people…Hamas and Hezbollah do not care about those innocent lives they endanger, they do care about the propaganda they can spread with half truths or flat out untrue lies because of their hate. If anyone thinks that’s not intentional, you might want to open your minds a little more and look at the bigger picture, or even at other past/current wars, and which sides use the propaganda angle more than others.

So what constitutes a proper response by Israel to the attack on 10/7? Well WWJD, the attacks never stopped by the Iranian proxies, but you seem to only look at the Palestinian angle. Hamas should have returned the innocent hostages, not constantly bombed Israel, and not had the Houthis and other groups disrupt the Mediterranean Sea shipping routes to start….see, it’s not just Israel here. When 9/11 happened, should the US have just attacked for a week or a month like you said? There’s no easy answer when you fight an enemy that attacks innocents for no reason to “justify” their cause. That is not what Israel is doing, but it is what Hamas did, no matter how you spin it.

Side note, but related, when I had a conversation about 6-12 months into the Ukraine/Russia war after a Russian bomb had inadvertently landed on Polish soil, and I was thinking at the time, this might get dicey with NATO, I was told then that Russia was basically a third rate military force that has nukes, which has been proven true. They however seemed more concerned about Iran. It dawned on me not long ago that they were basically right.

The thing is though, the Israel war bought Russia some time and gave them momentum…there’s a reason why these countries are friendly with each other, again people need to look at the bigger picture. But that’s a whole other thread topic.

I look forward to your edits of my posts, reminds me of the current social media environment on political topics for example, where they use one line of a five minute answer and use it to fit their own agenda, but do what you need to do. ✌️
 
Proportional response? Examples of wars won with ‘proportional response’?

When one side introduces war, they’ve invited slaughter until they renounce war.

I’m still waiting to hear the terms you wanted to offer the Nazis, and how early.
This. We moderns have forgotten that when it comes to war it makes long term sense for one side to actually win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gus is dead
You have to wonder how many Palestinians now irrevocably hate Israel - but would have been open to peace a year ago?
It goes both ways. I believe there were Israelis that wanted peace but after Oct 7, they can no longer envision peace with Palestinians any longer.
 
Israel needs to do whatever they need to do to protect themselves. Palestinians in Israel can either assimilate or go away.

If Israel needs to attack Iran to accomplish their goal of survival then so be it.

All you assholes discussing proportional response don't quite get it. A proportional response would be from the river to the sea equivalence. Want to guess what that means?
BS. Israel has gone too far. Using pinpoint bomb to take out a HAMAS leader? Great. Bombing urban apartment building, schools and hospitals indiscriminately? Not good. This isn’t hard.
 
You edited out a lot of my post, I know it was long, but I came into the thread two pages in, and hit a lot of topics at once, otherwise it would have derailed into many tangents, such as this.

With your edit of my post, conveniently flipping the question I posed to you and Ree back to me without answering it yourself btw, one thing that could have possibly curtailed some of the innocent casualties would have been the return of ALL of the also INNOCENT hostages Hamas took on 10/7, as Israel stated. Then they would have been open to peace talks. That never happened, but what did happen instead was the Iranian proxies ramped up attacks on Israel by air and at sea, thinking that Israel was weaker and more vulnerable than they were, and that the US and their Western allies were too spread out in Ukraine to offer as much support. This is Iran vs Israel, not Palestine or Lebanon, it’s just that the people in those countries are caught in the crossfire (not going to debate that the Palestinians allowed them into power, because it’s not that simple) and that’s the reality of these scenarios, which truly sucks. Read what Michael Herzog, Israel’s envoy in Washington said yesterday, literally saying Israel’s enemies “smelled blood” and sensed vulnerability. So no, this isn’t Israel wiping out a bunch of innocent people, Hamas/Hezbollah/Iran is as much or more to blame for what happened, but plays the “good guy” card while pointing fingers at “evil” Israel when they attack them, completely ignoring the fact they were hiding among innocent people…Hamas and Hezbollah do not care about those innocent lives they endanger, they do care about the propaganda they can spread with half truths or flat out untrue lies because of their hate. If anyone thinks that’s not intentional, you might want to open your minds a little more and look at the bigger picture, or even at other past/current wars, and which sides use the propaganda angle more than others.

So what constitutes a proper response by Israel to the attack on 10/7? Well WWJD, the attacks never stopped by the Iranian proxies, but you seem to only look at the Palestinian angle. Hamas should have returned the innocent hostages, not constantly bombed Israel, and not had the Houthis and other groups disrupt the Mediterranean Sea shipping routes to start….see, it’s not just Israel here. When 9/11 happened, should the US have just attacked for a week or a month like you said? There’s no easy answer when you fight an enemy that attacks innocents for no reason to “justify” their cause. That is not what Israel is doing, but it is what Hamas did, no matter how you spin it.

Side note, but related, when I had a conversation about 6-12 months into the Ukraine/Russia war after a Russian bomb had inadvertently landed on Polish soil, and I was thinking at the time, this might get dicey with NATO, I was told then that Russia was basically a third rate military force that has nukes, which has been proven true. They however seemed more concerned about Iran. It dawned on me not long ago that they were basically right.

The thing is though, the Israel war bought Russia some time and gave them momentum…there’s a reason why these countries are friendly with each other, again people need to look at the bigger picture. But that’s a whole other thread topic.

I look forward to your edits of my posts, reminds me of the current social media environment on political topics for example, where they use one line of a five minute answer and use it to fit their own agenda, but do what you need to do. ✌️
My edits of posts I reply to are for the purpose of making clear what part of longer posts I'm responding to.

Your all-over-the-place defense of genocide was interesting.

As to your question, I don't know what Israel should have done. Their initial response was probably in bounds - although as an occupying, oppressive power, maybe not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
This. We moderns have forgotten that when it comes to war it makes long term sense for one side to actually win.
Israel won a long time ago. They are now an occupying power that oppresses the people under their control. There are internationally required responsibilities occupying powers are supposed to observe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
You don’t have to take any of it seriously. However there is a difference between what you are suggesting as war crimes and someone seeing an issue with a group of people who is murdering your countrymen.
Thousands of Israeli and Palestinian parents have a legit issue with people murdering their innocent children.

How anyone who is a parent can’t see that shocks and saddens me.
 
Thousands of Israeli and Palestinian parents have a legit issue with people murdering their innocent children.

How anyone who is a parent can’t see that shocks and saddens me.

Why do you think rockets are being shot into Israel from schools and hospitals? Hamas is using those areas as human shields because they believe Israel does have humanity.

It doesn’t sadden me, but it shocks me that a person cannot see this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
Even the two-year olds? Or school children? At what point is a kid who just happened to be born in the Gaza Strip go from “innocent” to “sympathizer?”

The toddler bit is a strawman and I reject it.
 
Feel free to correct me with trustworthy links, but I don't think Hamas has been shown to fire rockets from hospitals and schools. Hide in them, yes; fire rockets, I don't think so. But, as I said, I might be wrong.

Why hide them if them in THOSE types of buildings? C’mon man, think.
 
Dumb strategy. Israel has proved them wrong, over and over again.

If Israel is on the same level as Hamas (which you’re then calling them a terrorist organization) why isn’t everyone in Palestine dead? They have the weaponry and the manpower….. it’s because they aren’t killing indiscriminately…
 
It makes long term sense to people in power whose concepts of order are wholly dependent on hierarchy.
I think it’s been a minute since an Indian killed a settler in your neck of the woods.
Not sure how much that was dependent on hierarchy instead of victory.
 
If Israel is on the same level as Hamas (which you’re then calling them a terrorist organization) why isn’t everyone in Palestine dead? They have the weaponry and the manpower….. it’s because they aren’t killing indiscriminately…
I agree that they aren't killing indiscriminately. They are killing very deliberately.

Yes, Israel is now a terrorist state.

If any small non-ally behaved this way we would have already labeled them such and would have heaped sanctions on them. If they had oil, we would have invaded or overthrown them.

And we certainly would have accused them of war crimes and probably genocide.

You know I'm right. What Israel is doing to the Palestinian citizenry makes how Saddam treated the Kurds look mild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and THE_DEVIL
I agree that they aren't killing indiscriminately. They are killing very deliberately.

Yes, Israel is now a terrorist state.

If any small non-ally behaved this way we would have already labeled them such and would have heaped sanctions on them. If they had oil, we would have invaded or overthrown them.

And we certainly would have accused them of war crimes and probably genocide.

You know I'm right. What Israel is doing to the Palestinian citizenry makes how Saddam treated the Kurds look mild.


Annnnnd we’re done here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gus is dead
I'm opposed to people who lie, too. But that's mainly your side. And definitely not me.

I'm just saddened that my country has become a nation where opposing the slaughter of mostly-innocent people is considered antisemitism.
The slaughter will stop the moment Hamas surrenders and releases the hostages that are still alive. Crazy simple.

This is how wars end definitively. Victory by one side. Lasting peace is rarely achieved by a settlement.
 
Just about the only difference between the two sides is that Israel does their seizing of land and killing of innocent civilians through an organized military, so it’s more intentionally acceptable.
Just ignorant. Israel has offered peace and a 2 state solution over and over and been rejected over and over. Palestine could be a thing but they have chosen war since 1947.

You tell me, after refreshing your knowledge of the history since the Balfour declaration, when it was that the 'Palestinians' offered peace to Israel and Israel rejected it?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ree4
I agree that they aren't killing indiscriminately. They are killing very deliberately.

Yes, Israel is now a terrorist state.

If any small non-ally behaved this way we would have already labeled them such and would have heaped sanctions on them. If they had oil, we would have invaded or overthrown them.

And we certainly would have accused them of war crimes and probably genocide.

You know I'm right. What Israel is doing to the Palestinian citizenry makes how Saddam treated the Kurds look mild.

All the Palestinians have to do is tell the Israelis where the leaders are, and where the hostages are. But they won't do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gus is dead
The slaughter will stop the moment Hamas surrenders and releases the hostages that are still alive. Crazy simple.

This is how wars end definitively. Victory by one side. Lasting peace is rarely achieved by a settlement.

What are you basing this on? Settlements are how 99% of warfare has ended in human history.

It's be easier if you guys that like to discuss victory terms would sack up and just state that you think the only way forward is annihilation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
What are you basing this on? Settlements are how 99% of warfare has ended in human history.

It's be easier if you guys that like to discuss victory terms would sack up and just state that you think the only way forward is annihilation.

I don’t think it’s exactly “sacking up” to say annihilating Hamas and Hezbollah and the like is victory.
 
I don’t think it’s exactly “sacking up” to say annihilating Hamas and Hezbollah and the like is victory.

So it's the labels you're looking to see vanquished, neat.

See you back here to discuss the next Israeli war vs a yet to be named coalition of Arab people in and around Israel/Palestine.
 
Just ignorant. Israel has offered peace and a 2 state solution over and over and been rejected over and over. Palestine could be a thing but they have chosen war since 1947.

You tell me, after refreshing your knowledge of the history since the Balfour declaration, when it was that the 'Palestinians' offered peace to Israel and Israel rejected it?
And every time in recent memory, the Israeli population balked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
Annnnnd we’re done here.
fb69b97a7755b04e8cf39c6a95c62ead.jpg
 
So it's the labels you're looking to see vanquished, neat.

See you back here to discuss the next Israeli war vs a yet to be named coalition of Arab people in and around Israel/Palestine.

They’re terrorists organizations that want to exterminate a group of people due to their ethnicity. Also, why does it have to be Arab people?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT