ADVERTISEMENT

Israeli "Surprise" Against Iran

They’re terrorists organizations that want to exterminate a group of people due to their ethnicity. Also, why does it have to be Arab people?

Yes, I'm aware. I'm also aware that they're not the first and won't be the last.

Mostly geography and historical context. Feel free to parse the definitions of anything you like.
The theme of what I'm saying won't change.
 
Yes, I'm aware. I'm also aware that they're not the first and won't be the last.

Mostly geography and historical context. Feel free to parse the definitions of anything you like.
The theme of what I'm saying won't change.

I have no illusions of trying to change your opinion, just attempting to understand the hoops you’ve jumped through to arrive at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gus is dead
I have no illusions of trying to change your opinion, just attempting to understand the hoops you’ve jumped through to arrive at it.

The only hoop I guess would be recognizing which nation in the region possess the most power and how effective these wars have been in the past. Maybe it's just easier to believe that this is the time violence will placate the area?
 
What are you basing this on? Settlements are how 99% of warfare has ended in human history.

It's be easier if you guys that like to discuss victory terms would sack up and just state that you think the only way forward is annihilation.
No. Settlements are how most recent wars have been won. Not in history.

I'd be fine with the total annihilation of Hamas. You conflate Hamas with Gazans. Hamas needs to surrender. If they did there would not need to be annihilation. They cannot win by any means other than allowing the citizens of Gaza to be in harms way, shielding them, and getting killed in. Numbers large enough to shock the conscience of the west. Hamas need to enter the battlefield, away from civilians, and may the best man win. They are cowards. They are evil and wish for the destruction of Israel by any means.
 
The only hoop I guess would be recognizing which nation in the region possess the most power and how effective these wars have been in the past. Maybe it's just easier to believe that this is the time violence will placate the area?

So if you think Isreal has the most power (which I agree with) why in the world would the Hamas or Hezbollah screw with them, unless of course you believe Israel is the aggressor here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bulldogs1974
No. Settlements are how most recent wars have been won. Not in history.

I'd be fine with the total annihilation of Hamas. You conflate Hamas with Gazans. Hamas needs to surrender. If they did there would not need to be annihilation. They cannot win by any means other than allowing the citizens of Gaza to be in harms way, shielding them, and getting killed in. Numbers large enough to shock the conscience of the west. Hamas need to enter the battlefield, away from civilians, and may the best man win. They are cowards. They are evil and wish for the destruction of Israel by any means.
70% of those killed in Gaza are women and children. Israel has bombed schools, hospitals, mosques, ancient Christian churches, residential buildings, refugee camps. 65 American doctors have signed off on a letter to Biden detailing how they have treated preteen kids with gunshot wounds to the head or chest. This is a genocide. There is no denying. Israel might as well bring in the gas chambers and ovens at this point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and GOHOX69
So if you think Isreal has the most power (which I agree with) why in the world would the Hamas or Hezbollah screw with them, unless of course you believe Israel is the aggressor here?
The Palestinian people have long been oppressed well before Oct 7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
The Palestinian people have long been oppressed well before Oct 7.

I’ve already asked this question in this thread but didn’t get an answer. Why can Arab folks live in Israel but there are portions of Gaza where Israelis will be killed at for entering?

To counter you point you think you’re making, have the Israelis been oppressed before October 7th?
 
No. Please provide me with a reference to this tripe.
The last significant step toward peace was the realignment of the West Bank and dismantling of settlements. 70 percent of Israelis balked when it was made public:


At the end of the day, both sides need to be okay with concessions for peace, but neither is.
 
70% of those killed in Gaza are women and children. Israel has bombed schools, hospitals, mosques, ancient Christian churches, residential buildings, refugee camps. 65 American doctors have signed off on a letter to Biden detailing how they have treated preteen kids with gunshot wounds to the head or chest. This is a genocide. There is no denying. Israel might as well bring in the gas chambers and ovens at this point.
Why do you suppose they have bombed those places?
 
The last significant step toward peace was the realignment of the West Bank and dismantling of settlements. 70 percent of Israelis balked when it was made public:


At the end of the day, both sides need to be okay with concessions for peace, but neither is.
First off, a poll isn't policy nor is it a rejection of a referendum to approve a treaty. Israel's leaders have proposed multiple negotiated 2 state solutions since 1947 and Palestinian leaders have rejected all of them. Most without a counter proposal.

Also from your source today

 
I’ve already asked this question in this thread but didn’t get an answer. Why can Arab folks live in Israel but there are portions of Gaza where Israelis will be killed at for entering?

To counter you point you think you’re making, have the Israelis been oppressed before October 7th?
Huh? Gaza was walled off from Israel. Israel controlled everything coming and going from Gaza. They even counted calories for food shipments.
 
First off, a poll isn't policy nor is it a rejection of a referendum to approve a treaty. Israel's leaders have proposed multiple negotiated 2 state solutions since 1947 and Palestinian leaders have rejected all of them. Most without a counter proposal.

Also from your source today

First off Israel had no right to exist in the first place. Of course they rejected stolen land.
 
So if you think Isreal has the most power (which I agree with) why in the world would the Hamas or Hezbollah screw with them, unless of course you believe Israel is the aggressor here?

They're willing to die to recruit the next generation of fighters. The whole area is filled with people that feel, and have compelling arguments, the aggression has started at a million different points in history. What I think has no bearing on whether or not Israel can kill their way to a peaceful existence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
I agree that they aren't killing indiscriminately. They are killing very deliberately.

Yes, Israel is now a terrorist state.

If any small non-ally behaved this way we would have already labeled them such and would have heaped sanctions on them. If they had oil, we would have invaded or overthrown them.

And we certainly would have accused them of war crimes and probably genocide.

You know I'm right. What Israel is doing to the Palestinian citizenry makes how Saddam treated the Kurds look mild.
So you are saying Gods chosen people are terrorist? Got it....!
 
Huh? Gaza was walled off from Israel. Israel controlled everything coming and going from Gaza. They even counted calories for food shipments.

Are you confused? My question is why are their Arab people living in Israel but it can’t be the other way around? That’s basically every Arab country….. this isn’t difficult and it isn’t some secret.

Edit: I’m done with this conversation. Hopefully the Palestinian people rise up against their government and put someone in who will take care of their people.
 
Last edited:
They're willing to die to recruit the next generation of fighters. The whole area is filled with people that feel, and have compelling arguments, the aggression has started at a million different points in history. What I think has no bearing on whether or not Israel can kill their way to a peaceful existence.


Yup, people willing to strap bombs onto their children to “even” the score. It’s a sickness

Edit: I don’t care enough about this discussion. You can support Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. I will continue to support Israel.
 
Last edited:
Total misrepresentation.
It’s not. The mental gymnastics some democrats go through when it comes to Islam is amazing.
The only solution in the Middle East is for women to be equals. Why are you ok with the total subjugation of half their people?
I’m not ok with people dying but again what’s the solution?
To act like Israel has the power is child logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
I don't necessarily agree that both side are committing war crimes, but the best way to not get prosecuted is to win....
"...the best way to not get prosecuted [for war crimes] is to win...."

Is this what passes for morality in the 21st century?

Sort of like the best way to get away with a regular crime is to not get caught.

Each of those formulations is, at best, amoral about the the harm - and, at worst, permissive about the crimes.

Surely we can do better. Surely we should do better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
The Netanyahu government has said explicitly it will not support a Palestinian state. Therefore, they are announcing a state of perpetual war as the Palestinian people will never agree to live under occupation for perpetuity. So no, it’s not a “final solution” genocide, but it is very much a refusal to accept sovereignty of an entire nation, which effectively “eliminates” them as an independent people.

Concurrently, the Hamas and Hezbollah charters call for the expulsion of all Jews from the region. Which is also effectively “elimination”

So yeah, intractable conflict. 🤷‍♂️
Israel has been shooting fish in a barrel for the last year. The fish have been in that barrel for decades, and have been shot at, off and on, for decades - something Israel has called "mowing the grass."

Now normally, if a populace was being slaughtered like that, most would try to get away. But not this time. Why not?

Because Israel won't allow it.

Why won't they allow it?

Seems obvious to me that Israel knows it has created hundreds of thousands, if not more, implacable foes. How could it be otherwise, when nearly every Palestinian in Gaza has had some family member or friend - often times many family members and friends - slaughtered?

I'm open to other interpretations or explanations. What have you got?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
They’re terrorists organizations that want to exterminate a group of people due to their ethnicity.
That's what we say. Ever wonder what they say? Do you think they would agree that it's "due to their ethnicity." Or might they say it's due to years of oppression? Or something else that we might be more sympathetic to?
 

Israel assures US it won't strike Iranian nuclear or oil sites, US officials say

Associated Press
MATTHEW LEE
Updated October 15, 2024 at 1:31 PM

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration believes it has won assurances from Israel that it will not hit Iranian nuclear or oil sites as it looks to strike back following Iran's missile barrage earlier this month, two U.S. officials said Tuesday.

The administration also believes that sending a U.S. Terminal High Altitude Area Defense battery to Israel and roughly 100 soldiers to operate it has eased some of Israel’s concerns about possible Iranian retaliation and general security issues.

The Pentagon on Sunday announced the THAAD deployment to help bolster Israel’s air defenses following Iran’s ballistic missile attacks on Israel in April and October, saying it was authorized at the direction of President Joe Biden.

However, the U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic discussions, cautioned that the assurance is not ironclad and that circumstances could change. The officials also noted that Israel’s track record on fulfilling assurances in the past is mixed and has often reflected domestic Israeli politics that have upended Washington’s expectations.

The most recent example of that was last month when U.S. officials were told by their Israeli counterparts that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would welcome a U.S.- and French-led temporary cease-fire initiative for Lebanon only to see Israel launch a massive airstrike that killed Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah two days later.

Netanyahu’s office said in a statement that “‏we listen to the opinions of the United States, but we will make our final decisions based on our national interests.”

The Middle East has been bracing for an expected response from Israel after Iran launched roughly 180 ballistic missiles on Oct. 1, which the United States helped to fend off. The tit-for-tat strikes and uncertainty about whether Israel might strike strategically important energy and nuclear sites in Iran have raised fears about escalation into an all-out regional war.
 
I'd be fine with the total annihilation of Hamas. You conflate Hamas with Gazans. Hamas needs to surrender. If they did there would not need to be annihilation.
Israel was mowing the grass before there was Hamas, although that particular phrase may be more recent.

“Mowing the grass” embodies more than just strategic fatalism; it also reflects a large measure of hubris. At its core lies the assumption that Israel can control the rheostat in Gaza, hitting Hamas just hard enough to deter it from attacking Israel but not so hard that Gaza implodes into chaos or explodes into a regional war. As one Israeli defense analyst said of the 2014 Gaza war, “We want to break their bones without putting them in the hospital.”​

more here

 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT