ADVERTISEMENT

ISU's best lineman out with Broken Leg

You must be new here. This is the place where it was said that Troy Davis, who is still the only collegian to post back-to-back 2,000+ yard seasons, would be fourth string at Iowa.
Did somebody actually say this? Good Lord, I hope not, and if so, do you remember who it was. All I can possibly back with is, every fan base has some incredibly stupid individuals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Khawk4
If I was a cyclone fan, I'd honestly be concerned that they might not win a single game. An injury plagued sucky football team under a new coach. I know the bottom half of the Big 12 is rather chitty, but there's no way they win more than 3 games.
 
This Campos kid was VERY highly sought after 4-star recruit out of WDM Valley. Played in the US Army AA game as a Senior. Make no mistake - we wanted him really bad. Easily the #1 recruit in Iowa that year. Sucks that he didn't enjoy Iowa City. I am pretty sure that he is indeed a RSJR this year. Perhaps he will get another year of eligibility if he is out for the year. He broke in as a starter after about 2 games his RSFR year and has been there ever since. First game as a starter was against Iowa in 2014 and had to play across from Drew Ott. "Welcome to Division 1, kid!" Played well enough for the 'Clones to eek out the win against us at Kinnick. Also - he is seriously smart. 4.0 in high school. Engineering major.

(Full disclosure: I know his dad from his Drake years) YES - I lobbied like hell for the OLINE factory that is Iowa, but "All of his buddies from Valley are going to Iowa State," is what swayed him after he de-commited from Mizzou.

If he had come to Iowa City he would have been the LT last year for sure. It would have been a helluva OLine if he and Pierschbacher would have teamed up. Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda.

Oh well. Serious loss for the 'Clones.

He can't even stick at LT at Iowa State and he would have been Iowa's starting LT? granted coaching has a lot to do with it but still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: terrehawk
So if Iowa is a lot better than ISU they should win no matter what. No need for a "Super Bowl" excuse
Sorry, I shouldn't have engaged with you. I'd have a better chance teaching algebra to a coffee mug.

It will give a retort that's on your level. NOOOOOOOOOO, YOOOOOOOUUUUUUUU!!!!

Now, give your six inch thick, Cardinal and gold glasses glasses come back. You have permission to just copy and paste from my second paragraph.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WORTHYWISH
Iowa has been the better program but if you look at the years ISU wins most of the time it's because they're the better team not because of who cares more. Iowa fans just use that as a crutch on why they lose to a terrible football program half the time
"Most of the time" means at least 5 of the 8 seasons when ISU has beat Iowa. I dare you to try and find 5 seasons when ISU had the better team.
 
"Most of the time" means at least 5 of the 8 seasons when ISU has beat Iowa. I dare you to try and find 5 seasons when ISU had the better team.

2000
2001
2005
2007 Iowa was better but both teams sucked
2011
2012

So there's 5 where ISU was better, 2007 Iowa had a better record but both teams sucked. 2002 Iowa was the better team but that was the Seneca game. 2014 Iowa was better
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Boys5
Iowa has been the better program but if you look at the years ISU wins most of the time it's because they're the better team not because of who cares more. Iowa fans just use that as a crutch on why they lose to a terrible football program half the time
I'm wondering if it really matters. Iowa State doesn't really have a football program. They field a team but in the grand scheme of things they have never really had any success aside from a few random flashes. ISU football has only had 6 winning regular seasons in the last 35 years. And have not had a single regular season winning record in the last 10 years. You have to agree that ISU football has to be one of the worst teams in college football over the course of the last quarter century. 6 winning regular seasons!!!!!! Not a single one in the last 10. Wow that is BAD
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK
I'm wondering if it really matters. Iowa State doesn't really have a football program. They field a team but in the grand scheme of things they have never really had any success aside from a few random flashes. ISU football has only had 6 winning regular seasons in the last 35 years. And have not had a single regular season winning record in the last 10 years. You have to agree that ISU football has to be one of the worst teams in college football over the course of the last quarter century. 6 winning regular seasons!!!!!! Not a single one in the last 10. Wow that is BAD

And to think Ferentz is 8-9 vs that team and in 6 of those 9 losses Iowa State was the better team. I guess ISU must have had 2 or 3 Super Bowl performances over a 17 year period though
 
If I was a cyclone fan, I'd honestly be concerned that they might not win a single game. An injury plagued sucky football team under a new coach. I know the bottom half of the Big 12 is rather chitty, but there's no way they win more than 3 games.
So is the top half of the Big12.
 
And to think Ferentz is 8-9 vs that team and in 6 of those 9 losses Iowa State was the better team. I guess ISU must have had 2 or 3 Super Bowl performances over a 17 year period though


83. isu
 
2000
2001
2005
2007 Iowa was better but both teams sucked
2011
2012

So there's 5 where ISU was better, 2007 Iowa had a better record but both teams sucked. 2002 Iowa was the better team but that was the Seneca game. 2014 Iowa was better
I'll give you 2012 even though Iowa shouldn't have lost. 2011 is very much debate able. 2005, you are high. 2000 and 2001 were rebuilding years for Iowa and glory years for ISU so I'll give you those.
 
I'll give you 2012 even though Iowa shouldn't have lost. 2011 is very much debate able. 2005, you are high. 2000 and 2001 were rebuilding years for Iowa and glory years for ISU so I'll give you those.

They both went 7-5 in 2005 and Iowa State beat Iowa. Iowa State was the better team no doubt
 
I think I proved my point.
How is that? The undebatable ISU wins were 2000, 2001, and 2012. You do realize what was going on in 2000, and somewhat into 2001 with Iowa football don't you?

How about the flip side? Were there any Iowa teams that beat ISU while being the worse team?
 
How is that? The undebatable ISU wins were 2000, 2001, and 2012. You do realize what was going on in 2000, and somewhat into 2001 with Iowa football don't you?

How about the flip side? Were there any Iowa teams that beat ISU while being the worse team?

6 of the 9 wins against Ferentz Iowa State was the better team. That pretty much ends that Super Bowl myth
 
First off, I feel terrible for Campos and his teammates, those who were his brothers in the trenches. That's a tough loss. Secondly, it's obviously tough because he was their lone returning guy with experience.

However, I'd appreciate input from any Cyclone fans who are "in the know" ... what philosophy are the Cyclones likely to have on O? Schematically, how are they going to look? Are they going to continue to try to copy the rest of the Big 12, or are they willing to use schemes that match better the personnel they can consistently recruit?

If they continue to be more of a spread team - then part of the whole premise of most implementations of the spread is to compensate for various issues/deficiencies on the OL by getting the ball out quickly into space. If this is the case - then injuries on the OL may not make that huge of an impact (apart from the necessary impact on run blocking).

If the Cyclones are going to embrace more of a "traditional" O ... then things could be a little more sketchy for them because such an O relies more upon solid OL play.

However, for the Cyclones, this year was going to be a building job anyhow. Their D was probably going to be a high point this year - so having the OL so patchwork definitely has to be annoying for the Clones. However, all the same, a healthy Campos would only be the difference in few games in terms of wins or losses. In the bigger picture, in the long term, this will at least help the Cyclones to develop more depth at OT.
 
You must be new here. This is the place where it was said that Troy Davis, who is still the only collegian to post back-to-back 2,000+ yard seasons, would be fourth string at Iowa.

I think Iowa fans were happy and preferred the likes of sedrick shaw and Tavian Banks while Troy was at ISU on poor teams getting 40+ carries in losses to get his yards. But go ahead take one persons comment on here to make it sound like this whole board thinks that way. Sure could find a lot of crazy dumb crap clown fans say about Iowa players on cyclone fanatic.
 
Feel bad for him. Put in all of that work in the offseason and have your season taken away in August during camp. Tough for the kid
 
2001 isn't debatable? ISU scored to take the lead in the last couple of minutes at home in a season both teams had the same record. If that's not debatable, then what on earth is?

You have the logical sense of menopausal woman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EZ2BJZ
Correct. Those are years Iowa went 3-9, 7-5, 7-5, 7-6, 4-8.
Yeah, in 2000, 2007, and 2012 Iowa was essentially garbage.

The Hawks were decent in '05, but the OL featured 2 new starting OTs (McMahon graduated and Lee Gray was injured). That was a poor match-up because that year had to be one of ISU's better defensive lines - perhaps one of their very best in recent history. Combine that poor mismatch with Tate's injury in that game (due to his own stupidity) ... and you get a game that got out of hand for the Hawks. In defense of the Clones, even with Tate healthy - the Hawks weren't moving the ball with consistency. In defense of the Hawks - without Tate, the Hawks had trouble even passing the midfield line.
 
I know ISU sucks at football but when they win it's because it's the only game they care about. I don't see how you can get blown out in the one game you care about
Because sometimes the talent gap is so large, all your cares just get run out of the stadium.
 
I thought that until I went to the practice Sat.
We have along ways to go on offense and people might be able to run on our defense.
Or else our defense and running game are title-level awesome. You know, either way.

What do you base the "people might be able to run on our defense" line on? The performance of our offense? The same offense you just said has a long way to go? You should take a break and go outside for awhile.
 
I think Iowa fans were happy and preferred the likes of sedrick shaw and Tavian Banks while Troy was at ISU on poor teams getting 40+ carries in losses to get his yards. But go ahead take one persons comment on here to make it sound like this whole board thinks that way. Sure could find a lot of crazy dumb crap clown fans say about Iowa players on cyclone fanatic.



The legend of Troy Davis grows. Never mind the guy gained all those yards against the 3rd & 4th string defenses of OK, Nebraska, etc... because his team was getting trucked 49-3 at halftime of those games.
 
Depends on how you define "top trio." I said "one of the better," which is top 25 material to me. Feel free to name 25 that are better.

Warren rushed for 1300+ yards on 5.9 ypc, while Lazard had 73+ ypg. Both would be the #1 at their position if they transferred to here. Lanning proved to be a quality dual threat quarterback in his limited starting time.

Agreed that Lazard would be a starter. Warren is debatable simply because he is young and would be behind Daniels (Sr.) and Wadley (Jr.), and unless there is a glaring weakness Ferentz traditionally favors the upperclassmen for starting roles. Plus, I don't know that of those three RBs anyone stands out as clearly better than the rest.

One thing is for sure, though, Iowa State has very good skill position players.
 
I think Iowa fans were happy and preferred the likes of sedrick shaw and Tavian Banks while Troy was at ISU on poor teams getting 40+ carries in losses to get his yards. But go ahead take one persons comment on here to make it sound like this whole board thinks that way. Sure could find a lot of crazy dumb crap clown fans say about Iowa players on cyclone fanatic.

Davis averaged 5.6 ypc, Shaw averaged 4.9. Banks only ran for 2773 in his 4 year career. Davis ran for 4195 in two years
 
Agreed that Lazard would be a starter. Warren is debatable simply because he is young and would be behind Daniels (Sr.) and Wadley (Jr.), and unless there is a glaring weakness Ferentz traditionally favors the upperclassmen for starting roles. Plus, I don't know that of those three RBs anyone stands out as clearly better than the rest.

One thing is for sure, though, Iowa State has very good skill position players.

If Warren wasn't starting for Iowa this year Ferentz deserves to be fired. Warren had almost as many yards in his freshman season than both those guys have in their career combined. Iowa has more talent than ISU no doubt but Lazard and Warren are studs and would be studs at Iowa.
 
And, as remains largely the case even today, the Big Ten featured proficiency in all three phases of the game.

How many games did isu win while Davis was amassing all those stats?

Not many and he was still a two-time all American and two time Heisman finalist. Really impressive
 
The legend of Troy Davis grows. Never mind the guy gained all those yards against the 3rd & 4th string defenses of OK, Nebraska, etc... because his team was getting trucked 49-3 at halftime of those games.

Honestly, I would disagree somewhat with that. I remember watching Troy Davis and he was a special talent. Plus, it's not like he was running behind a collection of Outland Trophy winners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyCity
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT