"Follow your shot".
First off back in Chad's day there wasn't a three point line. But he is a little before my time. So let's update this to Kevin Boyle who had one a sweet little baseline shot from about twelve feet and he did indeed follow his shot. Anyone think that was a mistake? Now talk to Ralph Miller and Lute Olson and teach them how to coach. Because I know in one case, and suspect in the other, we are not talking about shots from long distance.
Second, yes once players were pushed back to the three point line , "Follow your shot" became a rather lame idea. But because of the distance to the rim, not because it gives a shooter the idea he will miss or effects his shooting mechanics. (Who comes up with these?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"
)
Think about this. The smart move for the long distance shooter to make is to be prepared to cover the court against a break off a rebound. But tell them one or the other:
"Follow your shot", "Get to the top of the key to cover the break", and you are still suggesting they will miss, and if you are going to screw up their mechanics either statement will do just as good a job of it.
I would
almost accept that, "Follow your shot", went out with the midrange game. But complaining about Calabria following his shot is not historically accurate to the game.
Next I suppose we'll be saying Ronnie should never have penetrated as it left the opposing point guard primed for an outlet pass. (The accurate answer would be in the rotation someone should always be moving to the top of the key.) And again, where was Chad when he took the shot? If he's one of the wings and close enough he's going to have the best idea of anyone where the rebound will be.