ADVERTISEMENT

Judge upholds Trump’s felony conviction, schedules sentencing for Jan. 10

The Tradition is starting to reveal himself as an idiot if he’s serious.

Of course, I’m sure he voiced similar concerns when black people used to be convicted by all-white juries. It’s absolutely sweet that he cares so much about the mistreatment and miscarriage of justice Donald Trump has had to face his entire life. It’s so incredibly unfair.

Agreed. An all-white jury is not a jury of a black man's peers.
 
If you were a union boss facing criminal charges, would you want a jury composed of business owners?

If you were a Jewish Rabbi facing charges, would you want an all-Muslim jury?
You are aware that both counsels get to reject and accept jury members, right?
 
If you were a union boss facing criminal charges, would you want a jury composed of business owners?

If you were a Jewish Rabbi facing charges, would you want an all-Muslim jury?
No, I wouldn't want an all-anything jury. There are reasons that attorneys get to omit potential jurors, but to say that to be impartial they must be from the same socioeconomic tier is nothing more than a way for you to invalidate any trial result that you don't agree with.
 
No, I wouldn't want an all-anything jury. There are reasons that attorneys get to omit potential jurors, but to say that to be impartial they must be from the same socioeconomic tier is nothing more than a way for you to invalidate any trial result that you don't agree with.

Trial attorney dismiss all jurors who appear to be intelligent. They want stupid, convincible people on the jury.
 
Ordinary people can understand murder.

Complicated business records? Not so much.

I would also think doctors would be needed to convict other doctors of malpractice.
People can understand lying. There wasn't anything complex about what Trump did. His employees testified about how they lied and falsified records.
Are you saying people on a jury cannot understand when someone tells them how they lied to commit a crime?
 
Allen Weisselberg went to jail for him. Others had foggy memories for him. Only when confronted with documents did they decide to be truthful.
Don't confuse him with facts. I did that in the other thread and he just got scared and confused - like a horse whose blinders temporarily lifted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkMD and sabula
$20 says Trump skips the sentencing.
Why bother? Dude is a convicted felon with no punishment. If I was Trump I'd tell the judge over Truth Social to go eat himself. Then threaten his life. Nobody wants to do anything to keep this criminal in check.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawkMD
Hey, I can't control the majority dipshits that have no brains. I am content that I was on the the right side. I'll write a book about it.
 
Some people do not recognize the legitmacy of these charges and adjudication. Some would argue that this is the stuff of banana republics.
So what? The US judicial system does. That probably trumps, pun intended, "some people". Accountability sucks Beaver.
 
If you were a union boss facing criminal charges, would you want a jury composed of business owners?

If you were a Jewish Rabbi facing charges, would you want an all-Muslim jury?
If you were a rapist politician, would you want to be judged by a jury of your fellow Americans? No, by that logic you'd only want a jury of other rapist politicians. You can't make the stupidity in this line of thinking up... 🤔
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Twoooooooo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT