Sorry it was more of a question. Not well done by me. Kamala middle class bull shit is just that. Trumps stuff is a 1999 rap video production feel. Both suck.Where do you see my approval of anything in the OP?
Sorry it was more of a question. Not well done by me. Kamala middle class bull shit is just that. Trumps stuff is a 1999 rap video production feel. Both suck.Where do you see my approval of anything in the OP?
Deb Fischer has been running ads touting Trumps endorsement and Osborn is liberal. Osborn has been attacking Fischer's and ties to special interest. Osborn has jumped to a 5 point lead.The contrast is pretty interesting. Kamala’s ads are mostly positive about building the middle class and tax relief for working people. Trump is running attack ads about Kamala using tax money for prisoner sex changes, criminals she has pardoned who later murdered, and of course illegal immigrants.
So, positivity vs. fear porn. Which one do you think is more effective? Frankly, I think Democrats are making a mistake not running fear porn about Trump. With that said, she is really pounding economic insecurity and trying to make the case she is for working people and Trump is for rich people.
Anyway, which strategy is going to be more effective? I’m not asking your opinion of either candidate or the veracity of any of their claims. Which strategy is going to one) sway undecideds and two) help boost voter turnout for his or her side?
They literally pay people to lie and scare the shit of them It's like they refuse to be happy.For Trump's base? Fear Porn...it's what far right conservative radio and FoxNews has been conditioning them to expect for years. Positive ads resonate more with the thinking class.
Trump isn’t getting their votes anyway. I don’t consider this an attack ad, so much as he’s exposing who Harris really is since she avoids all hard hitting media.I just saw that one too.
I understand going after Kamala for prisoner sex changes, but piling on trans people with a “they/them” pot shot is tacky and irresponsible.
If that actually was the case, what would she do differently than she's proposed?I live in the Philly TV market, and if all I watched were GOP ads I would think Harris is going to escort millions of transgender Mexicans into my town to rape our women, molest our children, and takeover HS girls’ sports.
The contrast is pretty interesting. Kamala’s ads are mostly positive about building the middle class and tax relief for working people. Trump is running attack ads about Kamala using tax money for prisoner sex changes, criminals she has pardoned who later murdered, and of course illegal immigrants.
So, positivity vs. fear porn. Which one do you think is more effective? Frankly, I think Democrats are making a mistake not running fear porn about Trump. With that said, she is really pounding economic insecurity and trying to make the case she is for working people and Trump is for rich people.
Anyway, which strategy is going to be more effective? I’m not asking your opinion of either candidate or the veracity of any of their claims. Which strategy is going to one) sway undecideds and two) help boost voter turnout for his or her side?
Yes, Kamala is a California liberal trying to present herself as a moderate. It’s not going to persuade anyone.Sorry it was more of a question. Not well done by me. Kamala middle class bull shit is just that. Trumps stuff is a 1999 rap video production feel. Both suck.
I’m just going off the content of the attack ads. I’m not fact checking anything. It’s not really relevant to the efficacy of the ads. According to one attack ad I have seen from the Harris campaign, she is trying to make the case she is going to cut taxes for the middle class while Trump is going to tax groceries, gas, etc.Not that I don't believe you but who exactly did Kamala pardon considering she's never held an office where she held pardon power.
Is Wausau near Eau Claire or LaCrosse? It isn't just during games, it's ALL THE FREEKING time! Hovde, Baldwin, Cooke, Kamala, Trump. It's horrible. It also reminds me what it was like when Iowa was purple.Being in a purple area in WI, the ads are absolutely nonstop during games. I'm even well versed in a house race that isn't my district lol.
I also get anywhere from 2-6 political flyers in the mail daily. One thing I find interesting- my state rep is 100% MAGA. With the WI map now somewhat un-gerrymandered, he must have a competitive race because his flyers now proclaim that he's bi-partisan & works across the aisle. Amazing what happens to political positions when the job actually is endangered.
Is Wausau near Eau Claire or LaCrosse?
What legislation will lower grocery costs?Whining about grocery costs - she won't vote for anything that would lower said costs
I’ve seen several negative ads from her campaign as well. Mostly about him “being rich”.The contrast is pretty interesting. Kamala’s ads are mostly positive about building the middle class and tax relief for working people. Trump is running attack ads about Kamala using tax money for prisoner sex changes, criminals she has pardoned who later murdered, and of course illegal immigrants.
So, positivity vs. fear porn. Which one do you think is more effective? Frankly, I think Democrats are making a mistake not running fear porn about Trump. With that said, she is really pounding economic insecurity and trying to make the case she is for working people and Trump is for rich people.
Anyway, which strategy is going to be more effective? I’m not asking your opinion of either candidate or the veracity of any of their claims. Which strategy is going to one) sway undecideds and two) help boost voter turnout for his or her side?
Well you tell ‘em Igloo. Why don’t you just stay home?Here's my undecided...put on pants to go vote for Harris or just stay home. There's isn't a force on planet earth that would get me to cast a vote for Donald Trump. I'm in Texas, so would it even matter?
EDIT: I do have to put on pants to vote Cruz out, so maybe I'll multi-task.
Ask her. She's the one saying we need to bring down those costs in her stupid ad in a grocery score, blaming the insane liberals in Washington for raising them.What legislation will lower grocery costs?
He's going to vote against a rapist and felon. You?Well you tell ‘em Igloo. Why don’t you just stay home?
In 2017 Trump gave North Carolina less than 1% of the Federal assistance they requested after hurricane Matthew. I'd be reminding them of that every 5 minutes.Trump isn’t getting their votes anyway. I don’t consider this an attack ad, so much as he’s exposing who Harris really is since she avoids all hard hitting media.
Pointing out your opponent’s stances and record isn’t an attack. It’s not trivial to highlight her positions that many Americans aren’t for like taxing unrealized gains for instance.
If that actually was the case, what would she do differently than she's proposed?I live in the Philly TV market, and if all I watched were GOP ads I would think Harris is going to escort millions of transgender Mexicans into my town to rape our women, molest our children, and takeover HS girls’ sports.
Manipulated simpleton you say?In Iowa, Marianne M-M's ads are actually making me like her less. Whining about grocery costs - she won't vote for anything that would lower said costs, and then cheering on girls at soccer game scaring us about transgenders taking over. Lying bigot. Again, Republicans are MASTERS at coming up with boogeymen that gets their base afraid and riled up. Easily manipulated simpletons.
Interesting. What’s the rest of the story?In 2017 Trump gave North Carolina less than 1% of the Federal assistance they requested after hurricane Matthew. I'd be reminding them of that every 5 minutes.
Interesting. What’s the rest of the story?
Yes, one like yourself who voted for a grifting, lying, conman rapist...twice. One who continues to defend him when attacked on this board. Thank you for chiming in and giving us an example of precisely the type I was talking about.Manipulated simpleton you say?
Hmm. 🤔
That can't be in Penna, we already have 24-7 political ads, Ya can forget trying to watch the news, its all ads.Agree that there isn't a significant number of "undecideds".
Dems have excelled at promoting early/absentee.
With the fundraising heavily in favor of Harris, I expect a 30 day blitz.
There were two towns in Washington state that lost 90% of the homes, in 2020, due to wildfires. People in Trump's former admin have admitted that he looked up those counties, saw they didn't vote for him, and never declared the county an emergency. They had to wait until Biden got into office before they got the financial help they needed. Trump is not fit to be making these kinds of decisions. He's a vindictive, thin skinned little brat.In 2017 Trump gave North Carolina less than 1% of the Federal assistance they requested after hurricane Matthew. I'd be reminding them of that every 5 minutes.
Well, the Filthy Don ads are all lies, don't know how many are paying attention as his newer ads are bat shit crazy.We don’t see as many but I think they’re focused on swing states like PA.
Yeah, they’re pretty lame. I’ve seen those too.I’ve seen several negative ads from her campaign as well. Mostly about him “being rich”.
I can’t figure out what demographic she’s hoping to sway with those?
Agree on PA. Then again, there's only 7 States that matter.That can't be in Penna, we already have 24-7 political ads, Ya can forget trying to watch the news, its all ads.
Same in Indiana, although I do sense a kind of undercurrent developing. What was once considered a shoe-in for the governor's race here is nearly in the toss-up range now. Senator Mike Braun is the GOP candidate who is running against a former republican woman who won the state's Head of Public Education race here 8 years ago. I think she has a fair amount of momentum now.Haven't seen a single Trump or Harris ad here in Iowa. I guess our state has become as red as a clown's nose.
The mute button. I agree Kamala’s voice is like fingernails on a chalk board.What’s your secret to tuning out?
It’s like nails on a chalkboard to me
Kamala’s voice keeps getting more annoying by the day.
Wouldn’t guess that driving through Iowa city. All you see are signs about clowns Harris and WalzHaven't seen a single Trump or Harris ad here in Iowa. I guess our state has become as red as a clown's nose.
Economic insecurity is a serious concern for people. To think the economy would be better today had Trump won in 2020 is stupid.
YupEconomic insecurity is a serious concern for people.
YupTo think the economy would be better today had Trump won in 2020 is stupid.
Not sure I've ever actually watched that station, but sure.Did MSNBC teach you to think that?