If they don’t admit it it is simply proof of the accusation.This thread is full of FOX watchers and not one of them will will admit it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they don’t admit it it is simply proof of the accusation.This thread is full of FOX watchers and not one of them will will admit it.
Lol, has trad ever been right about a political take ever?
Sure thing trump.She's horrible. Everyone is saying that.
Sure thing trump.
You’re a shitty gaslighter.
This thread is full of FOX watchers and not one of them will will admit it.
This is a plus for "DEI training." Plausible deniability.
Since when has being a competitve Presidential candidate been a requirement for VP? I dont think that was true of Pence, Cheney or even Quayle... you make a stink about all of those too?There is a reason why she was one of the first candidates to drop out of the run for POTUS. Nobody even in the Democratic Party liked her as a candidate.
She's compared to Trump in the OP, dumbass.WHATABOUTISMS! It's the only answer to any criticism.
This is all true, but naming a woman of color as his VP candidate was more important to Biden than actual qualifications. That's the problem with identity politics. We end up with someone totally unqualified who is one heartbeat away from the most powerful job in the world. As you said, there were plenty of other people far more qualified to be VP, but Biden and the Democrats virtue signaled their way into selecting a total disaster of a person.I’m an independent so I don’t have a horse in the race. I’m also not going to waste time talking about Pence as he could have been so much worse than he was. I think Cheney holds the title for worst VP this century because of what he did to this country.
In reference to Harris, she isn’t a good VP. It really is disappointing that she was the one picked as she doesn’t have a future in the big seat. She isn’t a very good speaker, her personality isn’t that great or likeable, and the ideas she ran on in her primary were barely consistent. On top of that, she couldn’t run a viable campaign as there was too much infighting going on which killed her chances before the primaries even happened. Biden could have picked one of the younger and more personable options like Yang, Castro, or even Pete and they would have done just as well while setting up the future of the Dem party. Or he could have picked someone highly competent like Klobuchar and given her a head start towards a top of the ticket run. Instead he gave the VP slot to the candidate that never had much of a following, that dropped out of the race even before the Iowa caucus, and that accused him of being racist on national tv.
For Dems I'd think it'd be more relevant if Joe is indeed a 1 term president. She'd definitely be the front runner for the 2024 nomination if that's the case.Since when has being a competitve Presidential candidate been a requirement for VP? I dont think that was true of Pence, Cheney or even Quayle... you make a stink about all of those too?
She doesn't give a good interview. That's about it.I don't think anyone would argue that Harris' selection as VP is as much about providing diversity in executive leadership as anything else. That said, can you tell me, specifically, what she has done to this point to merit a label as "terrible" relative to past VP's? This is an honest question, as I haven't really seen what she has done up to this point.
Not everyone, Trad. Not I.She's horrible. Everyone is saying that.
I think "terrible" is a little unfair. She definitely needs to get better at handling the press though....if Lester Holt is throwing her for a loop with a question she had to know was coming she needs to work on her messaging skills.I don't think anyone would argue that Harris' selection as VP is as much about providing diversity in executive leadership as anything else. That said, can you tell me, specifically, what she has done to this point to merit a label as "terrible" relative to past VP's? This is an honest question, as I haven't really seen what she has done up to this point.
I would argue that communication skills are important, so it's fair to criticize her on that point.She doesn't give a good interview. That's about it.
Could be argued it's the most important skill for a VP to have in regards to their roll in a administration.I would argue that communication skills are important, so it's fair to criticize her on that point.
And Pense was a skilled interviewee? Please...I would argue that communication skills are important, so it's fair to criticize her on that point.
Pence's interview skills aren't relevant to criticisms of Harris' communication abilities.And Pense was a skilled interviewee? Please...
Yeah...Pence's interview skills aren't relevant to criticisms of Harris' communication abilities.
Well...she's...she's a WOMAN!! And...she's - you know *sideways glance* - black!I don't think anyone would argue that Harris' selection as VP is as much about providing diversity in executive leadership as anything else. That said, can you tell me, specifically, what she has done to this point to merit a label as "terrible" relative to past VP's? This is an honest question, as I haven't really seen what she has done up to this point.
As a VP candidate, she brought nothing to the table. Biden was not going to lose California. He was also not going to lose the minority or women's vote. Past VPs, including Pence, helped the Electoral College numbers. Pence helped shore up Midwestern states.I don't think anyone would argue that Harris' selection as VP is as much about providing diversity in executive leadership as anything else. That said, can you tell me, specifically, what she has done to this point to merit a label as "terrible" relative to past VP's? This is an honest question, as I haven't really seen what she has done up to this point.
Mike pence was picked because he was a suckass to the biggest fraud ever in politics and to the suckers, idiots, and losers who are in his cult. As bad as Harris might be(any jury, that doesn't include members of the trump insurrection party, would still be out) but she is still head and taillights above the dim bulb yes man pence.Mike Pence runs circles around Harris. It’s not even close. In addition, Harris was not even supported by her own party. She had zero money backing her up. She is VP because of her gender and color. Biden even made sure of it.
Joe Biden knows this better than most...Yeah...
Some folks smell different than others too...
No he's not, you know, and affirmation from you isn't exactly a ringing endorsement.He's absolutely right, you know.
You have no perspective, never doLast VP was almost assassinated by his running mates supporters and his running mate told the attempted killers that he loved them. Just want to put things in perspective here.
Ummm, not sure how you could possibly say she came close to winning that debate with Pence. I’m not arguing about which person is better than another. If you think she is the bomb, so be it. Lol. I am just stating my own opinion, but even the left wing media is having a hard time not cringing at her answers.Mike pence was picked because he was a suckass to the biggest fraud ever in politics and to the suckers, idiots, and losers who are in his cult. As bad as Harris might be(any jury, that doesn't include members of the trump insurrection party, would still be out) but she is still head and taillights above the dim bulb yes man pence.