ADVERTISEMENT

Kim Reynolds introduces bill defining 'man' and 'woman,' opponents brand it 'LGBTQ erasure'

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,934
113
Gov. Kim Reynolds introduced a bill Thursday that would define the words “sex,” “man” and “woman” in state law, requiring changes to the way the government collects public health data, issues birth certificates and drivers’ licenses, and offers anti-discrimination protections.

"We refer to it as the LBGTQ erasure act," said Keenan Crow, director of policy and advocacy for One Iowa.

The legislation, House Study Bill 649, creates a new section of code defining a person’s sex as their sex assigned at birth.

The bill defines a “female” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova and a “male” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female.

“Women and men are not identical; they possess unique biological differences,” Reynolds said in a statement provided to the Des Moines Register. “That’s not controversial, it’s common sense.

“Just like we did with girls' sports, this bill protects women’s spaces and rights afforded to us by Iowa law and the constitution. It’s unfortunate that defining a woman in code has become necessary to protect spaces where women’s health, safety, and privacy are being threatened like domestic violence shelters and rape crisis centers. The bill allows the law to recognize biological differences while forbidding unfair discrimination.”

The bill says that if a person is issued a new birth certificate, driver’s license or non-operator’s ID card following a sex-change operation, the new document will list the person’s sex at birth and their sex following the operation.

It also says that when the state, cities or school districts collect data — for public health reasons, crime statistics, or to comply with antidiscrimination laws — they will identify people as only “male” or “female.”

Intersex people, who are born with sex characteristics that do not fall under male or female, are not explicitly mentioned in the legislation.


The legislation does say that a person “born with a medically verifiable diagnosis of disorder or difference of sex development shall be provided the legal protections and accommodations afforded under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.”

In a statement, Iowa Safe Schools said the bill could be interpreted “as segregating transgender Iowans in facilities owned, operated, or funded by state government.”

“This bill is an affront to everything we’re about as Iowans,” Becky Tayler, executive director for Iowa Safe Schools, said in the statement. “Gov. Reynolds has made it crystal clear that transgender Iowans are not welcome in their own state.

Reynolds' proposal could require transgender Iowans to have unique birth certificates and drivers' licenses — which advocates said would mean disclosing personal medical information while purchasing alcohol or other unrelated activities that require a form of ID.

Pete McRoberts, policy director for the ACLU of Iowa, called the language an "astonishing violation" of privacy.

"Can you imagine if Gov. Reynolds had wanted you to put your COVID vaccination status on your license? Why would this medical information be any different?" McRoberts said.

"We're not talking slippery slope here," he added. "The slope is in the rearview mirror. The damage is done."

The legislation's definition of "mother" ("a parent who is female") and "father" ("a parent who is male") could also complicate circumstances for children with same-sex parents, Crow said.

 
Gov. Kim Reynolds introduced a bill Thursday that would define the words “sex,” “man” and “woman” in state law, requiring changes to the way the government collects public health data, issues birth certificates and drivers’ licenses, and offers anti-discrimination protections.

"We refer to it as the LBGTQ erasure act," said Keenan Crow, director of policy and advocacy for One Iowa.

The legislation, House Study Bill 649, creates a new section of code defining a person’s sex as their sex assigned at birth.

The bill defines a “female” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova and a “male” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female.

“Women and men are not identical; they possess unique biological differences,” Reynolds said in a statement provided to the Des Moines Register. “That’s not controversial, it’s common sense.

“Just like we did with girls' sports, this bill protects women’s spaces and rights afforded to us by Iowa law and the constitution. It’s unfortunate that defining a woman in code has become necessary to protect spaces where women’s health, safety, and privacy are being threatened like domestic violence shelters and rape crisis centers. The bill allows the law to recognize biological differences while forbidding unfair discrimination.”

The bill says that if a person is issued a new birth certificate, driver’s license or non-operator’s ID card following a sex-change operation, the new document will list the person’s sex at birth and their sex following the operation.

It also says that when the state, cities or school districts collect data — for public health reasons, crime statistics, or to comply with antidiscrimination laws — they will identify people as only “male” or “female.”

Intersex people, who are born with sex characteristics that do not fall under male or female, are not explicitly mentioned in the legislation.


The legislation does say that a person “born with a medically verifiable diagnosis of disorder or difference of sex development shall be provided the legal protections and accommodations afforded under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.”

In a statement, Iowa Safe Schools said the bill could be interpreted “as segregating transgender Iowans in facilities owned, operated, or funded by state government.”

“This bill is an affront to everything we’re about as Iowans,” Becky Tayler, executive director for Iowa Safe Schools, said in the statement. “Gov. Reynolds has made it crystal clear that transgender Iowans are not welcome in their own state.

Reynolds' proposal could require transgender Iowans to have unique birth certificates and drivers' licenses — which advocates said would mean disclosing personal medical information while purchasing alcohol or other unrelated activities that require a form of ID.

Pete McRoberts, policy director for the ACLU of Iowa, called the language an "astonishing violation" of privacy.

"Can you imagine if Gov. Reynolds had wanted you to put your COVID vaccination status on your license? Why would this medical information be any different?" McRoberts said.

"We're not talking slippery slope here," he added. "The slope is in the rearview mirror. The damage is done."

The legislation's definition of "mother" ("a parent who is female") and "father" ("a parent who is male") could also complicate circumstances for children with same-sex parents, Crow said.

The bill defines a “female” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova and a “male” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female.

Seems reasonable...what's the problem?
 
Gov. Kim Reynolds introduced a bill Thursday that would define the words “sex,” “man” and “woman” in state law, requiring changes to the way the government collects public health data, issues birth certificates and drivers’ licenses, and offers anti-discrimination protections.

"We refer to it as the LBGTQ erasure act," said Keenan Crow, director of policy and advocacy for One Iowa.

The legislation, House Study Bill 649, creates a new section of code defining a person’s sex as their sex assigned at birth.

The bill defines a “female” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova and a “male” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female.

“Women and men are not identical; they possess unique biological differences,” Reynolds said in a statement provided to the Des Moines Register. “That’s not controversial, it’s common sense.

“Just like we did with girls' sports, this bill protects women’s spaces and rights afforded to us by Iowa law and the constitution. It’s unfortunate that defining a woman in code has become necessary to protect spaces where women’s health, safety, and privacy are being threatened like domestic violence shelters and rape crisis centers. The bill allows the law to recognize biological differences while forbidding unfair discrimination.”

The bill says that if a person is issued a new birth certificate, driver’s license or non-operator’s ID card following a sex-change operation, the new document will list the person’s sex at birth and their sex following the operation.

It also says that when the state, cities or school districts collect data — for public health reasons, crime statistics, or to comply with antidiscrimination laws — they will identify people as only “male” or “female.”

Intersex people, who are born with sex characteristics that do not fall under male or female, are not explicitly mentioned in the legislation.


The legislation does say that a person “born with a medically verifiable diagnosis of disorder or difference of sex development shall be provided the legal protections and accommodations afforded under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.”

In a statement, Iowa Safe Schools said the bill could be interpreted “as segregating transgender Iowans in facilities owned, operated, or funded by state government.”

“This bill is an affront to everything we’re about as Iowans,” Becky Tayler, executive director for Iowa Safe Schools, said in the statement. “Gov. Reynolds has made it crystal clear that transgender Iowans are not welcome in their own state.

Reynolds' proposal could require transgender Iowans to have unique birth certificates and drivers' licenses — which advocates said would mean disclosing personal medical information while purchasing alcohol or other unrelated activities that require a form of ID.

Pete McRoberts, policy director for the ACLU of Iowa, called the language an "astonishing violation" of privacy.

"Can you imagine if Gov. Reynolds had wanted you to put your COVID vaccination status on your license? Why would this medical information be any different?" McRoberts said.

"We're not talking slippery slope here," he added. "The slope is in the rearview mirror. The damage is done."

The legislation's definition of "mother" ("a parent who is female") and "father" ("a parent who is male") could also complicate circumstances for children with same-sex parents, Crow said.

How do erase something that never was, is or will be? 🤡 You dorks wanna pretend to have a wee wee or a pussy, pack your trash and move on up to MinisooooooDUH!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RicoSuave102954
Gov. Kim Reynolds introduced a bill Thursday that would define the words “sex,” “man” and “woman” in state law, requiring changes to the way the government collects public health data, issues birth certificates and drivers’ licenses, and offers anti-discrimination protections.

"We refer to it as the LBGTQ erasure act," said Keenan Crow, director of policy and advocacy for One Iowa.

The legislation, House Study Bill 649, creates a new section of code defining a person’s sex as their sex assigned at birth.

The bill defines a “female” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova and a “male” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female.

“Women and men are not identical; they possess unique biological differences,” Reynolds said in a statement provided to the Des Moines Register. “That’s not controversial, it’s common sense.

“Just like we did with girls' sports, this bill protects women’s spaces and rights afforded to us by Iowa law and the constitution. It’s unfortunate that defining a woman in code has become necessary to protect spaces where women’s health, safety, and privacy are being threatened like domestic violence shelters and rape crisis centers. The bill allows the law to recognize biological differences while forbidding unfair discrimination.”

The bill says that if a person is issued a new birth certificate, driver’s license or non-operator’s ID card following a sex-change operation, the new document will list the person’s sex at birth and their sex following the operation.

It also says that when the state, cities or school districts collect data — for public health reasons, crime statistics, or to comply with antidiscrimination laws — they will identify people as only “male” or “female.”

Intersex people, who are born with sex characteristics that do not fall under male or female, are not explicitly mentioned in the legislation.


The legislation does say that a person “born with a medically verifiable diagnosis of disorder or difference of sex development shall be provided the legal protections and accommodations afforded under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.”

In a statement, Iowa Safe Schools said the bill could be interpreted “as segregating transgender Iowans in facilities owned, operated, or funded by state government.”

“This bill is an affront to everything we’re about as Iowans,” Becky Tayler, executive director for Iowa Safe Schools, said in the statement. “Gov. Reynolds has made it crystal clear that transgender Iowans are not welcome in their own state.

Reynolds' proposal could require transgender Iowans to have unique birth certificates and drivers' licenses — which advocates said would mean disclosing personal medical information while purchasing alcohol or other unrelated activities that require a form of ID.

Pete McRoberts, policy director for the ACLU of Iowa, called the language an "astonishing violation" of privacy.

"Can you imagine if Gov. Reynolds had wanted you to put your COVID vaccination status on your license? Why would this medical information be any different?" McRoberts said.

"We're not talking slippery slope here," he added. "The slope is in the rearview mirror. The damage is done."

The legislation's definition of "mother" ("a parent who is female") and "father" ("a parent who is male") could also complicate circumstances for children with same-sex parents, Crow said.

She's a person, a camera, and a TV away from a Trump aptitude test.
 
The bill defines a “female” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova and a “male” as a person whose biological reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova of a female.

Seems reasonable...what's the problem?
Why is it necessary? She already signed a law prohibiting transgendered people from participating in high school or college sports in Iowa so what will be gained by this law?
 
So, it can't be run up through the court systems to be overturned.
There is no reason both laws couldn't potentially be overturned by the court systems, the definition law is not going to prevent that possibility.
 
There is no reason both laws couldn't potentially be overturned by the court systems, the definition law is not going to prevent that possibility.
Muddies the legal system a lot. She's just playing the DeSantis playbook right now.
 
Can we get a bill limiting farm runoff? Clean waters? Affordable housing? Mental Health? Education? Child Care? Jobs? Energy? The time and energy the current Iowa GOP puts into this crap is amazing to me. So many pressing or important things to address but they are stuck on this.
 
Why is it necessary? She already signed a law prohibiting transgendered people from participating in high school or college sports in Iowa so what will be gained by this law?
To keep biological men out of domestic violence shelters and rape crisis centers serving women according to the article.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arrrrrghhhh!
A Governor can't erase the chromosomes someone is born with, or change the chromosomes someone is born with. If someone wants to change how they identify, they can go for it all they want, and more power to them, but they can't change their basic biology.
 
Can we get a bill limiting farm runoff? Clean waters? Affordable housing? Mental Health? Education? Child Care? Jobs? Energy? The time and energy the current Iowa GOP puts into this crap is amazing to me. So many pressing or important things to address but they are stuck on this.
An easy way to see action on affordable housing, jobs and certainly energy security, is to remove the current president from the White House.
 
Screenshot-2024-02-02-111149.png
 
  • Sad
Reactions: EasyHawk
Water problems, bridge problems, school problems. But no. All Kimmy and the Rs can focus on is this crap. Just watch, a few months from now the Rs will drag their feet on our real issues and introduce yet another anti trans law to pretend that they're doing something.
 
Water problems, bridge problems, school problems. But no. All Kimmy and the Rs can focus on is this crap. Just watch, a few months from now the Rs will drag their feet on our real issues and introduce yet another anti trans law to pretend that they're doing something.
what's the LGBTQ community doing to fix the water and the bridges?
 
Why would they fix our last in the nation bridges and near last in the nation water? That's the governor's job. A job she refuses to do.
Actually for those of us who didn't fail civics courses... the legislative branch ALWAYS has control of the purse, not the executive branch.

When the legislature signs an infrastructure bill, it then goes to the governor/president to sign it.
 
Actually for those of us who didn't fail civics courses... the legislative branch ALWAYS has control of the purse, not the executive branch.

When the legislature signs an infrastructure bill, it then goes to the governor/president to sign it.
The few who didn't bow to her got primaried, so she's shown she has total control of the legislature. So, now that we have that down... answer his question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkbirch and Ree4
Seems like it would be more beneficial to Iowans to deal with issues that are already happening before moving on to problems that rarely if ever happen.
🤷‍♂️ Guess that's why the Founding Fathers gave us the power of the vote.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT