The idea that the mainstream media and the Democrats are the same is idiotic. I swear the far right has lost the ability to think and reason.according to mainstream media and dems, which are the same, we are not having a bad economy.
The idea that the mainstream media and the Democrats are the same is idiotic. I swear the far right has lost the ability to think and reason.according to mainstream media and dems, which are the same, we are not having a bad economy.
I agree with everything you said, except that land isn't selling.Most guys have variable operating notes.
So not only are the prices down, their loan interest just doubled. That's a lot of money on say several hundred thousand of debt. Then if you have inputs staying roughly the same, you have a recipe for disaster. Hell, most land rent is still going UP. How does that even happen?
There's a reason why land isn't selling right now. Too much risk.
The guys with no debt won't lose too much sleep but most will.
He and I would probably get along great. LOLSays it's wasteful to go buy all these things when what he has works.
Always a very tough decision.When he passes my wife and her brother are going to have to decide if they want to lease the land or sell it off.
My agenda was that some, like the one I quoted will bitch when farmers get help but also bitch when they aren’t spending money.Manufacturing goes in cycles? Tell me more.
Like you don’t have an agenda? Good grief.
My agenda was that some, like the one I quoted will bitch when farmers get help but also bitch when they aren’t spending money.
Doesn’t take an agenda to call a spade a spade.
Nor does it take an agenda to realize that farmers get some great financial breaks from American taxpayers.
Yeah, but I'm not looking forward to going through it when it happens. Going to be a rough time.Always a very tough decision.
Gets more and more difficult when generations start passing away.
At least you will get a step up in basis so if you sell it's pretty much a tax free transaction.
Yes, but you might be surprised to learn how little row crops contribute to the cost of our food. Labor, transportation, and even packaging, contribute more.This is truly unfortunate news for those impacted by the decision. The number of people in this country who live paycheck-to-paycheck is staggering and a job loss can be devastating.
Lower grain prices should equate to lower food costs for the consumer.
Consumers want food prices to come down.
The "price" of lower food costs desired by consumers has a negative impact upon those who work in sectors which are hurt by lower grain prices and, in contrast to what consumers demand, would likely benefit by higher grain prices/higher food costs.
Farmers generally struggle. It’s a tough racket…farming, OiT. The economy is doing fine at the moment. But economies go UP and DOWN. But let’s be honest here OiT, the US economy is much more vibrant than other nation’s economies are at present.according to mainstream media and dems, which are the same, we are not having a bad economy.
Farm economy is often independent of the overall national economy. I’m surprised you didn’t know thataccording to mainstream media and dems, which are the same, we are not having a bad economy.
Tariffs have consequences.according to mainstream media and dems, which are the same, we are not having a bad economy.
Interesting perspective.. not just the farmers with large credit lines, but JD and all row crop related machinery manufacturers have designed equipment for (taking a wild guess here) at least $5+ corn .. so they will have to retool somehow.. bankers sweating they don’t want to call in loans.Yes, but you might be surprised to learn how little row crops contribute to the cost of our food. Labor, transportation, and even packaging, contribute more.
The current price slump in grains, and thus farmer income, is more a function of the supply/demand cycle. This cycle is no longer just a North American phenom, its world wide with Brazil becoming a very robust competitor. These current depressed prices will almost assuridy uncover increased demand in the next couplethree years...and thus it goes.
Farm economy is often independent of the overall national economy. I’m surprised you didn’t know that
Can you share what $5 corn and equipment design have to do with each other?Interesting perspective.. not just the farmers with large credit lines, but JD and all row crop related machinery manufacturers have designed equipment for (taking a wild guess here) at least $5+ corn .. so they will have to retool somehow.. bankers sweating they don’t want to call in loans.
The market will have to figure it out or weird things will start to happen.
Could be a case of three shifts and not easy to tell everybody simultaneously.This just in...employees at Kinze first heard the news of the layoffs from a KCRG news story.
That's some real bullshit regarding Kinze Mgmt.
I could be wrong, but I believe they only have two work shifts in Williamsburg.Could be a case of three shifts and not easy to tell everybody simultaneously.
Of course I could be wrong but have heard about the difficulties of telling three shifts corporate news before the press finds out.
Iowa needs diversification in its economy, bigly. We have not expanded our manufacturing base enough, nor has Iowa invested in new industries. We have to decide if it’s woke or not, first.Does ag need another bailout or just continue their welfare system?
Can you share what $5 corn and equipment design have to do with each other?
Bank of Hawk said that.Corn is currently $4, not $5. I’m not sure what you mean by design but farmers aren’t going to be making high dollar capital purchases if they don’t have to.
Why I said wild guess, looking for others to bring in a more expert opinion.Bank of Hawk said that.
Morning in America in 1984, not in farm country. Similarly the strong national economy but bad farm economy in 88 when Dukakis took Iowa.Farm economy is often independent of the overall national economy. I’m surprised you didn’t know that
Land sells and damn high. Just isn’t much for sale. 230 acres sold in Grundy county for over $17,000 an acre not that long ago.I agree with everything you said, except that land isn't selling.
While the record high price being set with just about every sale has cooled...land is still trading at high prices historically. But yes, many farmers are caught in a crunch now, no doubt. Some though are still sitting there with A LOT of cash, ready to buy land, etc.
So not necessarily design but productionWhy I said wild guess, looking for others to bring in a more expert opinion.
A lot easier for JD to sell a half a million tractor when corn is $7, than $4… yet there is a tipping point between those figures where we see these layoffs at equipment manufacturers, such as JD and Kinze.
I am looking at the price of corn as the leading indicator… not the farmers personal decision to buy or not buy-which is a lag result of the leading indicator.
It seems the business plan for these manufactures was based on their projections of much higher grain prices than where they are currently at.
How do they adjust as a business to remain in business under these low grain prices? Where is the inflection point?
Life is not always fair…farmers are not excluded. The move is more and more to “corporate farms” and only the big ones will survive. Smart (and lucky) operators will survive. Those short on cash and victimized with bad luck, won’t. Pretty simple. Nothing sinister but honest. Capitalism survives because it destroys folks financially.My agenda was that some, like the one I quoted will bitch when farmers get help but also bitch when they aren’t spending money.
Doesn’t take an agenda to call a spade a spade.
Wow, I'm not so sure about your last sentence.Life is not always fair…farmers are not excluded. The move is more and more to “corporate farms” and only the big ones will survive. Smart (and lucky) operators will survive. Those short on cash and victimized with bad luck, won’t. Pretty simple. Nothing sinister but honest. Capitalism survives because it destroys folks financially.
For capitalism to win, someone has to lose. Winners are constantly working to tip the field in their favor. Capitalism cannot grow if all things are equal. There must always be “an edge” or something to leverage.Wow, I'm not so sure about your last sentence.
So who was the loser when Microsoft introduced the windows operating system? Maybe a few folks who were trying to make a competing operating system, although I’m sure those losers could have easily been hired by Microsoft or another tech company after their company went bankrupt.For capitalism to win, someone has to lose. Winners are constantly working to tip the field in their favor. Capitalism cannot grow if all things are equal. There must always be “an edge” or something to leverage.
Government?? I was talking “capitalism”….Capitalism demands losers for it to succeed. For every winner in capitalism, there are one or more losers in its wake. These small farm machinery manufacturers and smaller under capitalized farmers are in the way of the scythe of capitalism.So who was the loser when Microsoft introduced the windows operating system? Maybe a few folks who were trying to make a competing operating system, although I’m sure those losers could have easily been hired by Microsoft or another tech company after their company went bankrupt.
But the positive impact, Microsoft and windows, created was far and vast; as such the shareholders were rewarded handsomely.
If there was no reward, would there have been a Microsoft to begin with?
Would the government, (in a more China like way) have done better in creating the value for everyone the same way Microsoft did?
So is there a better way than capitalism?Government?? I was talking “capitalism”….Capitalism demands losers for it to succeed. For every winner in capitalism, there are one or more losers in its wake. These small farm machinery manufacturers and smaller under capitalized farmers are in the way of the scythe of capitalism.
I’m not going there….all I am saying is that capitalism destroys folks financially in order to survive. Just. A. Simple. Observation.So is there a better way than capitalism?
I’m sure those people it destroys aren’t actually destroyed. Plenty of ways for someone to pick up new work and maybe even learn from their failures to get better.I’m not going there….all I am saying is that capitalism destroys folks financially in order to survive. Just. A. Simple. Observation.
I would argue, someone has to win.For capitalism to win, someone has to lose. Winners are constantly working to tip the field in their favor. Capitalism cannot grow if all things are equal. There must always be “an edge” or something to leverage.
Someone does “win”…… but understand, someone does “lose” too. And the bankers are the enablers…I would argue, someone has to win.