Not 30 years & let's throw him a party tonight! Put Kirk at Michigan, OSU or PSU for 26 years and he'd probably have 25 more wins to that total. Think of the recruits he would have to work with at those schools & how well he coaches players up.Im neither a dumbass nor someone with an agenda. Should we still be getting on our knees for Kirk if it took him 30 years to reach the same feat?
Kirk is obviously a solid to good coach but he's nowhere near the upper tier or elite level coaches. He's a good coach approaching records and reaching milestones based off his longevity and some years against a very weak BigTen West.
If he coaches 10 more years and hits 250 wins should we throw a party or something?
So STFU & get off Kirk's back, celebrate the milestones...