1st world problems.Giving up $14.5M.
Is the problem stupidity, arrogance or both?
1st world problems.Giving up $14.5M.
Is the problem stupidity, arrogance or both?
75% of NFL players end up essentially broke, or something close to that. I get it, the NFL owners are evil and the team is screwing him....just saying, they offered a pretty reasonable amount of money. It’s his right to refuse, but I doubt this decision pays off for him. We shall see.The closest he will get to pumping gas is perhaps owning a few gas stations...
Yes but the tag has been applied to players who's contracts are going to expire to allow the team to trade them.You can be cut/traded, but the money is still guaranteed, at least that's how I've always read the rules. It really doesn't matter much, I can't think of a player who was tagged and then subsequently cut because he started sucking at football without any injuries.
Yes but the tag has been applied to players who's contracts are going to expire to allow the team to trade them.
I don't understand. So he benefits from forfeiting 14.5 million?Figured as much. Thanks.
I don’t blame him one bit. Running backs have 6-7 years tops. He needs to get paid while he can, and with guaranteed money. He will get paid next year.
He’s been tested while he was gone. Just like every other player.
I don't understand. So he benefits from forfeiting 14.5 million?
I don't understand. So he benefits from forfeiting 14.5 million?
No, he's out the $14.5M.....but he didn't get injured this year. The big risk with tagging guys is that they could suffer a major injury while tagged and then never get that one big contract. If he played this year and, say, tore his ACL, he'd get the $14.5M, but he'd be playing for relative scraps after that in a comeback attempt. As it is now, he lost the $14.5M, but still may be in line for a big check.
75% of NFL players end up essentially broke, or something close to that.
Misleading maybe, but accurateThat stat is so misleading.
Most careers are three years are less so that is why many players end up "broke." Even then most players make $1.5 million in those three years. It's their own damn fault for blowing thorough it and not spending it wisely.
Misleading maybe, but accurate
doesnt he also get credited with a year of service time toward his pension?
I didn’t follow this close, but all I’ve heard the last few years is how replaceable RBs are.I don’t think it was stupid, now he’s a free agent and he will get 50 million.
I didn’t follow this close, but all I’ve heard the last few years is how replaceable RBs are.
Do most figure Bell come out ahead on this gamble?
Found somewhere that breaks down contractsHard to say. I think the jets gave him 30 million.