Maine Removes Trump From Ballot
- Thread starter Thunderlips71
- Start date
So? Why do you assume party over country? Because that's what the GOP has become?
Can you give us an example of Democrats not allowing a vote on a nominee like McConnell did with Garland?
[fn 1] Critics of the Colorado decision point out that Trump was never charged under that criminal statute. Nor was he convicted for insurrection during his impeachment trial. True enough. But technically, Section 3 doesn't mandate a criminal conviction; and it doesn't require proof beyond reasonable doubt.1 day ago
You’re uninformed.
There you are being dishonest again. How could they when they didn’t have 60 seats in the senate? At least the president did what he could.
He had his vote and didn’t get the numbers needed.
His immigration bill was money to help speed up the processing of immigrants. Compare that to the bill the house passed sitting in the senate. Which one would do anything to fix the border?
I didn't claim it was the exact same, only that it was justice for how dems behaved then.
This is an effort to keep an ineligible candidate off the ballot.
That's a criminal standard being met on all 91 of his criminal charges. if the framers intended that to be a requirement, the amendment would say so. It doesnt.
You know this ruling does nothing to affect any citizens right to vote freely and fairly and have their vote count so spare us the dramatics.
My God you're dumb.
On October 23, 1987, the Senate rejected Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court by a vote of 42–58. Altogether, two Democrats and 40 Republicans voted in favor of confirmation, whereas 52 Democrats and six Republicans voted against.
Because we are not familiar with the Colorado Court. Whereas we know the SCOTUS has been loaded up with partisan Republicans.
Sure.
If a all R state court tossed Joe from the ballot I’m sure it wouldn’t come up 🙄
If he was involved with a insurrection the Democrats would be sure he wasn't on the ballot.
Routine and basic? Say it isn't so. Too bad the people that need to read and understand that article won't read it.
All this talk about Trump and the Constitution reminds of me that one time he posted this on Truth Social...
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," in regards to the election being "stollen" from him.
“A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution," in regards to the election being "stollen" from him.
There's no reason to be afraid of an ineligible candidate.
Because he's being held accountable for actions? Why is the right afraid to do that?
Do I get to discount Supreme Court decisions because of all the Republicans? Or Republican Governor actions? Unfortunately no, it doesn’t work that way.
Great idea! Do it!
You are the king of all the "I don't like trump but" posters here. Everything he does you are always here defending him. It's laughable you would try to pretend anything different
McConnell didn't have 60 seats when he pushed Gorsuch through with 51 votes, the first time a supreme court justice has had less than 60 votes.
Similar threads
