It depends on what coverage they are in! It is hard to run jailbreak or bubble in man coverage.Couldn't agree more about using the bubble screens. I think our run game is good enough to exploit their over pursuit and will be open to the pass to the RB's out on the edge. I also noticed that late during the NW game, we starting running our FB Kulick up the middle and can also be an option they could be working on. These guys remember losing to this team last year and will be wanting some payback. We are at home. We win this one going away by 4 TD's.
If CJB can run the bootleg, that will open up the field and give him the run/pass option. I love his ability to read the D at the line of scrimmage and check into an effective play. .... I'm confident CJB will take advantage of the opportunities that Maryland presents.
You are pretty much a dick, eh?Wow, you two should be sitting in on the game plan meetings! I'm sure they would listen to you and I KNOW THEY WOULD WANT TO HAVE YOU IN THE BOX ON SATURDAY SO YOU CAN MAKE SURE GD KNOWS WHAT TO DO. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just get drunk, watch the games, and have a good time and quit pretending you have a clue about how to run a college offense or that you know what CJ is capable of going into the game. LMAO!!!!!!!!!
Not really. Just a realist. What should anyone say. "Right on man". "You nailed it brother". "I'm sure that's what they are thinking". LOL. What I can't figure out is why some of you don't see how funny so much of this is?You are pretty much a dick, eh?
Someone times it is a better idea to just say nothing rather than be an asshole....Not really. Just a realist. What should anyone say. "Right on man". "You nailed it brother". "I'm sure that's what they are thinking". LOL. What I can't figure out is why some of you don't see how funny so much of this is?
Well, you're close. It actually is:Someone times it is a better idea to just say nothing rather than be an asshole....
Stay silent and not be thought an asshole, speak up and remove all doubt. ....or something like that.
Well, that's probably better than Christiana's Shallow Thoughts! lolDeep thoughts by Jack Handy
Wow, you two should be sitting in on the game plan meetings! I'm sure they would listen to you and I KNOW THEY WOULD WANT TO HAVE YOU IN THE BOX ON SATURDAY SO YOU CAN MAKE SURE GD KNOWS WHAT TO DO. LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Just get drunk, watch the games, and have a good time and quit pretending you have a clue about how to run a college offense or that you know what CJ is capable of going into the game. LMAO!!!!!!!!!
That said, plain and simple CJ is going to be limited the rest of this season. While he is better today than he was post NW, he's still not right. He's not going to have his early season mobility. He's living on the edge...play by play, game by game. More than two weeks and greater measures are required to fully heal.
Oh yeah! Well I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night!Pot meet kettle.
I don't have a clue about running an offense. That's not my job. And, I can safely presume that it's not yours as well.
However, based upon the very specific and detailed information that was provided to me by the father of a current offensive starter, CJB's injury is one which will not heal by the end of the year, is one which will not keep him off the field in its current condition but very much has a risk of being aggravated or made worse and his prognosis is guarded.
Feel free to call me out all you want or say that I am making it up. I'll be happy to share who, what and when About the info I received ... after the season is over. I was not told that it was confidential but, out of respect for the father, his relationship with CJB and his son's friendship with CJB, I feel compelled to withhold those details at this time.
Given the level of detail and specifics of what was described to me about the nature of what is causing CJB's "gimpiness" (using term that has been used by others in the media), I think that it is wishful thinking to expect CJB to be making a bunch of plays with his legs, that the OC will be calling for plays that rely upon CJB's legs or that the bye week will have him return to 100%. The specific words told to me were "this is not an injury that will heal by the end of the year as long as CJB is playing football."
How do you know he's right on target with everything stated? Have you talked to the team physicians and to the coaches? Sounds like there may be some serious hipaa violations occurring since you two have 'specific and detailed' information about someone's medical condition. So you believe his 'fourth hand' information (physician to CJ, CJ to the offensive starter, Offensive starter to his dad, that dad to Aurora) is accurate? Just sounds like rumor and speculation to me, kinda of like playing 'telephone'.To echo the post above...he's right on target with everything stated.
There's plenty of wishful thinking surrounding CJ...and why not, it's free and IA is unbeaten. We all want to see great things from him and the team.
That said, plain and simple CJ is going to be limited the rest of this season. While he is better today than he was post NW, he's still not right. He's not going to have his early season mobility. He's living on the edge...play by play, game by game. More than two weeks and greater measures are required to fully heal.
He's going to absolutely play every snap he can, but if Weigers does not play a legitimately important role this year, I'd be pleasantly surprised.
Weigers is being looked at a bit differently than he was a few weeks ago. A real contingency plan now. Don't worry,12-0 would still be possible.
I just made all of that up on my typewriter and UPS'd it to the interphones.
Oh yeah! Well I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night!
How do you know it's a HIPAA violation?How do you know he's right on target with everything stated? Have you talked to the team physicians and to the coaches? Sounds like there may be some serious hipaa violations occurring since you two have 'specific and detailed' information about someone's medical condition. So you believe his 'fourth hand' information (physician to CJ, CJ to the offensive starter, Offensive starter to his dad, that dad to Aurora) is accurate? Just sounds like rumor and speculation to me, kinda of like playing 'telephone'.
(You know the classroom or camp game you would play as children, telephone. Where the teacher or leader starts with a sentence and whispers to the first child who whispers to another then on and on throughout the whole group. Then the last kid will get up and say their version of the sentence. Now in my life I have never seen one where the sentence was successfully transferred. The first sentence is "Sally was eating apples on saturday" and ends with something like "Sandy was at the beach sunday". There were people who didnt remember what they heard, didnt hear correctly and those who changed stuff just to mess up the game.)
If I were Aurora, I would be careful about what he is saying, and to his comment that it isn't 'confidential' information, I believe he is wrong. All medical information is confidential. The coaches even have to be careful about what 'medical' information they put out about a player and how.
How do you know he's right on target with everything stated? Have you talked to the team physicians and to the coaches? Sounds like there may be some serious hipaa violations occurring since you two have 'specific and detailed' information about someone's medical condition. So you believe his 'fourth hand' information (physician to CJ, CJ to the offensive starter, Offensive starter to his dad, that dad to Aurora) is accurate?
If I were Aurora, I would be careful about what he is saying, and to his comment that it isn't 'confidential' information, I believe he is wrong. All medical information is confidential. The coaches even have to be careful about what 'medical' information they put out about a player and how.
Against my better judgment . . . but here goes.
One, who ever said that the person with whom I spoke didn't get the information directly from CJB? You are assuming a lot.
Two, it is pretty evident that you don't know squat about HIPAA. I'm not regulated by HIPAA. Further, HIPAA is meant to protect against the disclosure of an individual's health information by certain, defined entities. So, while it is admirable that you'd try to provide me with some legal guidance with respect to HIPAA, I'd suggest that you familiarize yourself with the specific provisions contained in the CFR before spouting off on an issue about which you know nothing. When CJB informs others of the specifics of an injury and the risks associated with the injury . . . it is axiomatic that he isn't particularly concerned about privacy.
Third, during KF's radio show yesterday, he stated that CJB (and others) wouldn't be 100% by January.