LolIt’s become readily apparent that Republicans are no longer a party of principle but of white angst, nationalism, racism, fascism, and corporate interests.
You caught him! He tried to get a nominee through in an election year!Obama's 2016 comments are coming back to haunt the dems. Obama demanded the senate fill the supreme court vacancy-now he says they cant do it.
Again, on October 19, 2016 Barack Obama insisted the Senate confirm his SCOTUS nominee.
Hope he gets a good deal for the seat. He shouldn't go home empty handed after saving the country from the demonrats. In fact demorat Rod Blagoevich (who he granted clemency to after her learned Rod was really treated very unfairly started it and maybe Obama had something to do with it).yes so whats wrong with Trump doing that now ?
YepThe Supreme Court already has a conservative majority in place. Trump could do a lot to calm unrest in the country by allowing the vote to occur after the election. That at least gives the Democrats a chance to name the appointee. Personally, I’d prefer to see a left-leaning or moderate judge chosen, as a more balanced court is in theory a more objective court.
While I don't think that's a good idea, either, it's quite possible it could happen.
Go look at your first post in this thread, that's an example of what most of us would call celebrating......never mind, you're too stupid to engage with.When did I celebrate death?
You’re just a typical left wing propagandist.
The great news is holding a vote.
Don't be obtuse. It's one thing when you push your agenda when you have control...fine. Set the rules. But then when the same thing happens 4 years later, don't be hypocrites by changing them. Don't play both sides. If McConnell does this then I don't give a crap what the Democrats do for payback.You mean like the ACA? It was pushed through a Dem controlled Congress. You know, the 4 months that Obama had total control. Don't sit here and say the Democrats don't do the same thing because it's a flat out lie you hypocrite.
Aren't you precious, look at you playing internet tough guy. Don't worry, anything the Democrats do will be small potatoes. The last thing I'm worried about are threats from the weak.Voting on legislation that requires both houses of Congress to pass and can be undone or modified at any time is NOT exactly the same as one chamber approving a lifetime SCOTUS appointee. You know it, so don't be stupid.
You're definitely right that Scalia's seat would have been filled in 2016 had Dems controlled the Senate, because that would have been the right thing to do. Moscow Mitch obstructing a vote for over a year was despicable.
I've been saying this to you little Con f*ckers ever since this came up - Go ahead and make your move. Just remember that those moves have consequences, and you very well could soon be looking at a blue WH, House, and Senate. Go ahead and give the Dems every reason to squash you. You feel lucky? Do ya, punk?
So you are saying Garland wouldn't have been confirmed if the Senate was Blue? That's bullshit and you know it.Stop with the “lie” garbage.
A Supreme Court confirmation and legislation are completely different scenarios. It’s not a lie, not an opinion, it’s a fact.
You guys can justify this by saying the Dens would do the same thing, but that’s just your opinion. What is fact is the GOP blocked Garland and now wants to jam through a new nominee.