ADVERTISEMENT

Megan Gustafson Pro Career

Ok, there's no way you read the actual article yourself LMAO. Cute little Google search and copy/paste though.

I stopped after just one, bc Joan of Arc never actually fought in battle 🤣🤣🤣 that's based on her very own testimony, Smart Guy. Find more adequate evidence, and I'm all ears. But I'm not gonna waste my time when this one is terminally flawed from the outset. You lose.

I won't respond anymore, since others want this thread to remain on topic. I can respect that... that gift of mine will help prevent you from future intellectual embarrassment as well. You're a ****ing lightweight.
Guess I should known better than to try to post articles about true history to someone who only sees their own opinion as correct. Have fun in your own little world. In addition, you have no idea what my academic credentials are so be careful with lightweight comments. Arrogance is not a good look for you and responding with insults to true information is pretty silly for an adult.
 
Meg was a perfect 4 for 4 shooting with 7 points and 3 rebounds in a 6 point Mercury win.
Math is a wondrous thing. Someone cannot possibly go 4 for 4 and end up with 7 points. They can have anywhere from 8 to 12 points (no free throws) depending on the mix of 2-point shots vs 3-point shots. Since the post before shows her making a three, the least she could have scored was 9 points on 4 shots. She could have scored 7 points if she took fewer shots or had free throws but not by going 4 for 4.
 
Math is a wondrous thing. Someone cannot possibly go 4 for 4 and end up with 7 points. They can have anywhere from 8 to 12 points (no free throws) depending on the mix of 2-point shots vs 3-point shots. Since the post before shows her making a three, the least she could have scored was 9 points on 4 shots. She could have scored 7 points if she took fewer shots or had free throws but not by going 4 for 4.
The article I read worded it oddly, like her 3 wasn’t a part of her 3-3 shooting, but it was. I just assumed they included free throw shots or something. Should have dug into that more.
 
I don’t know how Meg is going to survive the WNBA with all this ostracizing by her Black coach and Black/lesbian teammates. Her coach is so racist for this, and belittling her with the nickname “Money Meg”! Great call, @twindman, @intrepodor, @retrodent and @herkhatescy seeing this anti-White persecution before we all could…

Because she had a great game. 12 points, 8 rebounds in 12 minutes. You should of watched the games before this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amahawk
Would the Hawks win the National Title with CC and Megan on the same team?
I think combination of right coach and adding outside shot to her game. Shes undersized for a post, so she needed an outside threat and driving game to be able to cause matchup problems.
 
I think combination of right coach and adding outside shot to her game. Shes undersized for a post, so she needed an outside threat and driving game to be able to cause match-up problems.
I saw an video where they were projecting Angel Reese in the wnba and basically said that she struggles against large posts due to lack of jump shot and outside threat. Very similar to the issues Megan had.
 
I think combination of right coach and adding outside shot to her game. Shes undersized for a post, so she needed an outside threat and driving game to be able to cause matchup problems.
Her team is so bad that they should play her at forward, with Griner at center, just to get her on the court more. With minutes she will prove that she is clearly one of the top four, if not three best players on that team.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT