That is called the bullyNice first for stoll he looked good but can someone tell me what that takedown move was, looked like let me push you and cover.
what is that supposed to mean - "you guys"I would say a good first day back for stoll , would think you guys are encouraged by that. Thought a few times he would turn Larson
what is that supposed to mean - "you guys"
No offense, I meant all Hawkeye fans. Maybe should have said ladies or make it gender neutral but at my age hard to change. regardless great to see him healthywhat is that supposed to mean - "you guys"
I really hope you're not serious
100% serious. If you can't go behind a guy when he's got nothing but his fingertips on the back of your leg, you're not going to win many Big 10 matches.
If Sammy wrestles like he's capable, he's a legit National title contender.
I think the question was about the implication that Brooks may not be qualifying for Nationals. Yes, if he wrestles to his potential, he could place highly. No, he's not going to be failing to qualify for Nationals. That's just a silly thing to be implying, no matter how flat he looked against Jackson.100% serious. If you can't go behind a guy when he's got nothing but his fingertips on the back of your leg, you're not going to win many Big 10 matches.
If Sammy wrestles like he's capable, he's a legit National title contender.
Beating Dean?
If he wrestles like he's capable, it's absolutely possible. Owings beat Gable. Marianetti beat McIlravy. And as good as Dean is, he's nowhere near their level.
I think the question was about the implication that Brooks may not be qualifying for Nationals. Yes, if he wrestles to his potential, he could place highly. No, he's not going to be failing to qualify for Nationals. That's just a silly thing to be implying, no matter how flat he looked against Jackson.
He is most likely going to be a three timer with a third place finish his freshman year. His only loss in the NCAAs is to another three timer. This year...he is doing a pretty good imitation of a super elite guy. But we will have to wait and see what this guy has to say about it tho...
http://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/the-dean-hodge-breaker.224857/
My post was a follow-up to Omahahawk86's post(that I should have quoted) that stated Brooks would not be on the podium if he wrestles like that in March. I simply took it a step further and said he won't qualify IF HE WRESTLES LIKE THAT (meaning the match he just wrestled against Indiana).
Not sure if you guys watched it, but that match was really bad. I absolutely love Sammy. Other than Gilman, he's my favorite guy on the team to watch. I just wasn't real happy with the effort in that last match.
Whom he had already beaten earlier in the year. He keeps up his dominance this year and wins another title and he's absolutely on McIlravy's level IMO.He is most likely going to be a three timer with a third place finish his freshman year. His only loss in the NCAAs is to another three timer. This year...he is doing a pretty good imitation of a super elite guy. But we will have to wait and see what this guy has to say about it tho...
http://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/threads/the-dean-hodge-breaker.224857/
Upsets can and do happen in sports. Just ask Danny Kanell.
It was very disappointing. I was shocked at how little effort Jackson had to make to break Brooks' single and get his own TD. It was way too easy.
That doesn't make your comment any less ridiculous, though. Jackson was a 5th place finisher at the NCAAs last year. A close loss hardly translates to "he wont qualify with that effort." That said, we all sometimes say dumb things we really don't mean.
My point was that Brooks may have looked bad in that match but that it's nuts to suggest that he may not qualify for Nationals. It's just over-the-top negativity. Most guys look bad from time to time. I don't like it any more than you do, but we're all well-advised to lay off the nutty exaggerations when our guys go down, even if they look bad in the process.My post was a follow-up to Omahahawk86's post(that I should have quoted) that stated Brooks would not be on the podium if he wrestles like that in March. I simply took it a step further and said he won't qualify IF HE WRESTLES LIKE THAT (meaning the match he just wrestled against Indiana).
Not sure if you guys watched it, but that match was really bad. I absolutely love Sammy. Other than Gilman, he's my favorite guy on the team to watch. I just wasn't real happy with the effort in that last match.
My point was that Brooks may have looked bad in that match but that it's nuts to suggest that he may not qualify for Nationals. It's just over-the-top negativity. Most guys look bad from time to time. I don't like it any more than you do, but we're all well-advised to lay off the nutty exaggerations when our guys go down, even if they look bad in the process.
Why do you keep owning an ignorant comment? Spooner tried giving you and easy out .Not a nutty exaggeration at all. Lack of reading comprehension from you and others.
I gave Carton zero chance of beating Jack and he was one poor scramble away from doing just that. Got in on a nice shot and just didn't finish it fast enough, and not surprisingly got out scrambled by a real good wrestler in Jack. Carton showed a lot of spunk in that match, hope he can keep it going on the back side.Why do you keep owning an ignorant comment? Spooner tried giving you and easy out .
Lets give the wrestlers the benefit of doubt when they look off. Everyone knows that Sammy always brings it. He wrestles more banged up in a season than mcriblet has had in a career. It was obvious that Sammy wasn't firing on all cylinders.
While I am venting. Tarphawk probably posted the dumbest thing I have read on here in a long time. You really want to say it was stupid for a freshman to choose down at a mid season tournament? Choosing down was the right call for him at this point in his career. It is about his development. You should understand this more than the peanut gallery.
How about Meyer? One or two posts about his good day. Young had an awesome day. He was a freshman mistake from being in the semi's. Stoll made his debut and knocked some rust off and stayed healthy. Carton was a finished TD away from knocking off a top 5 kid.There were a lot of positives yesterday but the board is filled with negativity. Sorry for the rant but the negativity on here is sad.
Young gave up a 6-point move in the first. He had a great shot and looked to have the TD, but he got outscrambled and ended up on his back.I didn't get to see all of Young's match he lost, but saw all of the 3rd period and he absolutely should have won that match. He WAS the better guy. He burned too much time off the clock on some nice shots he initiated, and let the guy do the same thing to counter him each time. I realize sometimes it is easier said than done, but he needed to adjust his mindset and technique after experiencing the same counter each time. Find a way to finish faster. And of course he could have tried to ride him out to get to OT, where he was clearly the better wrestler down the stretch. I don't know what happened there or if he just wasn't aware he needed to ride him out to tie. Not sure who was in his corner, but either way it was a match he could have and probably should have won. Either way, great effort late to give him a shot at winning, with a couple of hiccups along the way.
Why do you keep owning an ignorant comment? Spooner tried giving you and easy out .
Lets give the wrestlers the benefit of doubt when they look off. Everyone knows that Sammy always brings it. He wrestles more banged up in a season than mcriblet has had in a career. It was obvious that Sammy wasn't firing on all cylinders.
While I am venting. Tarphawk probably posted the dumbest thing I have read on here in a long time. You really want to say it was stupid for a freshman to choose down at a mid season tournament? Choosing down was the right call for him at this point in his career. It is about his development. You should understand this more than the peanut gallery.
How about Meyer? One or two posts about his good day. Young had an awesome day. He was a freshman mistake from being in the semi's. Stoll made his debut and knocked some rust off and stayed healthy. Carton was a finished TD away from knocking off a top 5 kid.There were a lot of positives yesterday but the board is filled with negativity. Sorry for the rant but the negativity on here is sad.
imo, no one on this forum should be surprised by what we see in Brooks. He can look like a NCAA champ in one match, then a non-placer in the next. He's been that way his entire career at Iowa.
The consistency from him is just not there. It also makes his contribution at Nationals uncertain. I've seen it many, many times. A senior loses in an early round and realizing his dream of a championship is gone...he packs it in and doesn't even place.
If he's got a problem, it's between the ears. Some of his big wins have proven he has the necessary talent. Maybe it's an OPRF thing?
Sammy got beat in a close match by a really good kid who also happened to have a higher finish than Sammy at NCAAS (different weight, but still), and you think his effort was so listless a similar effort in the B1G tourney will result in a failure to qualify?Not a nutty exaggeration at all. Lack of reading comprehension from you and others.
Did you even watch the match?Sammy got beat in a close match by a really good kid who also happened to have a higher finish than Sammy at NCAAS (different weight, but still), and you think his effort was so listless a similar effort in the B1G tourney will result in a failure to qualify?
Champion hawk is correct, Spooner did give you and easy out and yet it's like you're on the under 3 merry-go-round. You are 6 inches off the ground, spinning about 1 revolution a minute and everybody is telling you go ahead hop off its safe, but your fear of self acknowledgment of a silly statement keeps you on with the rest of the silly folks.