I like watching the carnage from the sideline with a beer in my hand, once that switches over to bourbon I will be throat punching people all over the place.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like watching the carnage from the sideline with a beer in my hand, once that switches over to bourbon I will be throat punching people all over the place.
Hey dumbass. None of those charts have anything to do with your original contention.
Yes. They do. The majority of illegal immigrants are here based on overstayed visas.
NOT "wall crossings".
I'd like to see your 3rd chart include the total 'permits' granted versus those that overstayed.
When more than 50% of those here illegally come by air, sea or car/vehicle, a "wall" ain't gonna do jack squat.
Wasn't the original point you made.
Try again.
Yes. They do. The majority of illegal immigrants are here based on overstayed visas.
NOT "wall crossings".
If ICE isn't paying for the incarceration, then local forces shouldn't have to keep them in jail, at local taxpayer cost.
This is what ICE wants local forces to do: be an arm of ICE and use local resources, at local cost, to do their jobs for them.
I just think it would be interesting.Not sure why that matters.
The point was that the majority of the illegals here aren't coming from Mexico, nor coming "over walls". And that is a substantiated claim.
Doesn't mean we don't deport them; simply means "a wall" isn't solving our problems.
Do the feds pay for the incarceration of a counterfeiter when he is arrested by local law enforcement?,.... No, they are held locally until the feds come and collect them,... very easy to employ the same approach here.
I just think it would be interesting.
In an ironic twist this guy was held on an ICE detainer until the locals could file 1st degree murder charges.
What would people think if the feds has released him and said well it is not our job to enforce local and state laws?
I'm pretty sure they were detaining him either way. Nice spin,tho.
Confront the topic, and quit talking to yourself in the corner.
LOLWUT?
ICE puts in detainment requests routinely, regardless of the violation.
IF this guy had been picked up for speeding, the local police would have given ICE the option of showing up within the normal timeframe, or they'd let him go.
However, they picked him up on a capital murder charge. They weren't letting him go, regardless of any ICE detainers placed on him.
I suspect that if we polled local taxpayers we would discover that there is overwhelming support for spending local dollars to support the federal immigration effort....
Narrator: "Until the local bills came thru; then people would freak out at their tacked on new 'property taxes' or 'local sales taxes' needed to cover it."
I can see it already on the local ballots: "Do you approve a 15% local sales tax, renewing annually, for building a facility to detain individuals ICE places a detainment-request on, at the cost of $2.5MM on the edge of town, including $200,000 per year for staffing and maintenance costs?" Yes/No
Narrator: "Until the local bills came thru; then people would freak out at their tacked on new 'property taxes' or 'local sales taxes' needed to cover it."
I can see it already on the local ballots: "Do you approve a 15% local sales tax, renewing annually, for building a facility to detain individuals ICE places a detainment-request on, at the cost of $2.5MM on the edge of town, including $200,000 per year for staffing and maintenance costs?" Yes/No
Bullshit, you're grossly exaggerating the cost
Really? I think I'm vastly UNDERestimating the costs for an entirely new facility and manpower to maintain it.
I suspect that if we polled local taxpayers we would discover that there is overwhelming support for spending local dollars to support the federal immigration effort....
Really? I think I'm vastly UNDERestimating the costs for an entirely new facility and manpower to maintain it.
He was picked up, as in arrested from the street, on a capital murder charge?
As in he was out walking around and the local police pulled up, and said you are under arrest for capital murder?
That is how it went down?
You probably are,... except for the fact that the vast majority of municipalities will not require a new facility nor the additional manpower to staff it,.... nice try.
I think you'd be surprised how many facilities might be needed. Remember....lots of folks are 'picked up', only to find they have legal residency here.
I am still interested in your response to this. @Joes Place
I think you'd be surprised how many facilities might be needed. Remember....lots of folks are 'picked up', only to find they have legal residency here.
2. ICE officials lodged a federal immigration detainer for Rivera after his arrest. "That move means the agency has probable cause to believe he is subject to deportation," the AP reported.
So. What is your point?
Picked up for what?
What was he arrested for?
Random, minor violations.
ICE puts in a detainer.
Later, suspect is let go, because they aren't actually here illegally.
Cristhian Bahena Rivera, 24, was arrested and charged with first-degree murder in the death of the 20-year-old Tibbetts,
https://apnews.com/c40d14e3d9dd45fa...owa-student-killed-by-Mexican-in-US-illegally
I'm sure w/o that ICE detainer, they'd have let him go out on his "own recognizance", right?
Not in Iowa. In California or New York, maybe.Cristhian Bahena Rivera, 24, was arrested and charged with first-degree murder in the death of the 20-year-old Tibbetts,
https://apnews.com/c40d14e3d9dd45fa...owa-student-killed-by-Mexican-in-US-illegally
I'm sure w/o that ICE detainer, they'd have let him go out on his "own recognizance", right?
I think you'd be surprised how many facilities might be needed. Remember....lots of folks are 'picked up', only to find they have legal residency here.
EDIT: I stand corrected. The detainer was filed after his arrest.
Total personal curiosity, but I wonder if he volunteered to talk or was held on something.
In this case he was picked up and held on an immigration violation. This was all so the locals could get their charges in order, and allowed him to be interviewed.
It is ironic that in a sanctuary city an ICE detainer would be refused, but in this case the locals "needed" ICE to hold him to help them out.
I'm glad you are not in charge of the Powishiek county sheriff's office otherwise if I was ICE I would have given you the finger as you shuttled people who had a requested ICE detainer out the back door of your jail.
They had him on surveillance cam video, shortly after she had jogged by.
ICE had no "detainer" in on him when he was originally questioned.
Confronted with some evidence, either he confessed, or was jailed on suspicion while they gathered additional evidence. Either way, an ICE detainer did not play AT ALL in his incarceration or arrest. Zip.
Ergo: you have been fully misinformed on this entire point.
Enjoy your crow.
NOPE