The Supreme Court declined Thursday to take up a legal challenge brought by health care workers in New York who oppose the state’s vaccination mandate on religious grounds.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said the court should have taken the case.
When the requirement was first imposed in August to help prevent the spread of the latest coronavirus variant, it allowed exceptions based on medical reasons or religious objections. But the religious exemption was later removed.
Gov. Kathy Hochul, who is Roman Catholic, said that she wasn’t aware of any “sanctioned religious objection from any organized religion” and that religious leaders, including the pope, were encouraging people to get vaccinated.
Sixteen health care workers sued, saying they had religious objections because fetal cell lines were involved in the testing, development or production of Covid vaccines. They said the mandate violated their religious freedom because it allowed others who were unvaccinated to continue working.
Lawyers for the state said the Covid mandate was similar to long-standing rules requiring health care workers to be vaccinated against measles and rubella. Those requirements, too, allow exemptions only for medical reasons. Laboratory-grown stem cells, which derive from cells collected from a fetus nearly 50 years ago, were also used to test the rubella vaccine, the state said.
“The presence of a single, limited medical exemption to a vaccine requirement does not require the State to provide a blanket religious exemption from vaccination,” they said in their written submissions.
Writing for the three dissenters, Thomas said confusion remains about a mandate that provides no religious exemption, like New York’s. He said the court should have taken the case now to head off similar confusion in the future.
In December, the Supreme Court declined to temporarily block the vaccination requirement in the case. Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch said then that the court should have granted the request to put the mandate on hold.
Since last fall, the court has declined to block other vaccination mandates that don’t provide for religious exemptions, applying to New York teachers, Navy sailors, health care workers in Maine and Massachusetts, and college students in Indiana.
www.nbcnews.com
This court has been very deferential to religious freedom, but not here...
And it makes no sense. The Covid vaccination does not stop anyone from getting it or spreading it.
If it did (like with measles and rubella) that would be a different story, but it doesn't do that.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said the court should have taken the case.
When the requirement was first imposed in August to help prevent the spread of the latest coronavirus variant, it allowed exceptions based on medical reasons or religious objections. But the religious exemption was later removed.
Gov. Kathy Hochul, who is Roman Catholic, said that she wasn’t aware of any “sanctioned religious objection from any organized religion” and that religious leaders, including the pope, were encouraging people to get vaccinated.
Sixteen health care workers sued, saying they had religious objections because fetal cell lines were involved in the testing, development or production of Covid vaccines. They said the mandate violated their religious freedom because it allowed others who were unvaccinated to continue working.
Lawyers for the state said the Covid mandate was similar to long-standing rules requiring health care workers to be vaccinated against measles and rubella. Those requirements, too, allow exemptions only for medical reasons. Laboratory-grown stem cells, which derive from cells collected from a fetus nearly 50 years ago, were also used to test the rubella vaccine, the state said.
“The presence of a single, limited medical exemption to a vaccine requirement does not require the State to provide a blanket religious exemption from vaccination,” they said in their written submissions.
Writing for the three dissenters, Thomas said confusion remains about a mandate that provides no religious exemption, like New York’s. He said the court should have taken the case now to head off similar confusion in the future.
In December, the Supreme Court declined to temporarily block the vaccination requirement in the case. Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch said then that the court should have granted the request to put the mandate on hold.
Since last fall, the court has declined to block other vaccination mandates that don’t provide for religious exemptions, applying to New York teachers, Navy sailors, health care workers in Maine and Massachusetts, and college students in Indiana.
Supreme Court won't hear challenge to New York vaccine mandate for health care workers
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said the court should have taken the case.
www.nbcnews.com
This court has been very deferential to religious freedom, but not here...
And it makes no sense. The Covid vaccination does not stop anyone from getting it or spreading it.
If it did (like with measles and rubella) that would be a different story, but it doesn't do that.
