Typical leftist behavior tbh
Look at the ****ing idiots! That don't read or understand anything.
These are stupid mother****ers.Look at the ****ing idiots! That don't read or understand anything.
OP is awful. Old posts, lies… just nonstop with that guy.Opinion pages? How do it work?
But nice job on posting a ten year old op-ed On the ball as usual.
Ignore it because it is old? Wild take when referencing pedophilia tbhOP is awful. Old posts, lies… just nonstop with that guy.
What's the take then?Ignore it because it is old? Wild take when referencing pedophilia tbh
Why are leftists like this?
The take is clearly that rocky wants us to ignore this because it is an old article. Even you in your infinite stupidity should have been able to grasp that straw, comrade.What's the take then?
Pretty much. Dems will be dems..Kleptomania is a disorder, not a crime, so we shouldn't throw thieves in jail.
Pyromania is a disorder, not a crime, so we shouldn't throw arsonists in jail.
Is that the logic?
Democrat leader Dick Durbin says yesHere’s a question that libs will avoid until it’s mainstream - but I’ll give it a shot…
Is pedophelia an acceptable lifestyle if you were born that way?
I'm obviously talking about the article. What's it talking about? What stance is it taking?The take is clearly that rocky wants us to ignore this because it is an old article. Even you in your infinite stupidity should have been able to grasp that straw, comrade.
Of course not tardo. Because nobody accepts acting on pedophilic impulses, you idiot. Hence the law and 99.9% of public opinion being against such.Here’s a question that libs will avoid until it’s mainstream - but I’ll give it a shot…
Is pedophelia an acceptable lifestyle if you were born that way?
Democrats leader dick durbin disagrees with pretty much everything you just said.Of course not tardo. Because nobody accepts acting on pedophilic impulses, you idiot. Hence the law and 99.9% of public opinion being against such.
As far as "type of person" that might engage in pedophilia is concerned, the single largest type category we can point to happen to be religious. (and probably conservative in demeanor)
Then give me the evidence.Democrats leader dick durbin disagrees with pretty much everything you just said.
@ScruddyI'm obviously talking about the article. What's it talking about? What stance is it taking?
Is it "pro pedophilia" as PP states?
No. It's not the ****ing point. This author, like 99.9% of all people is apparently not against punishment for molesting children.Kleptomania is a disorder, not a crime, so we shouldn't throw thieves in jail.
Pyromania is a disorder, not a crime, so we shouldn't throw arsonists in jail.
Is that the logic?
Dick durbin fought to keep the epstein logs secret. So weird. You can Google it lolThen give me the evidence.
Throw that guy in a ditch and shoot him …
Of course not. Has anyone here ever argued that point?Here’s a question that libs will avoid until it’s mainstream - but I’ll give it a shot…
Is pedophelia an acceptable lifestyle if you were born that way?
lol? Really? That?Dick durbin fought to keep the epstein logs secret. So weird. You can Google it lol
Blackburn once again called on Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) to “step forward and support the subpoena request to the Epstein estate.”
Since the beginning of January, four rounds of documents relating to the late financier have been made public, which revealed over 150 names.
The notable people listed in the documents– which include former presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, attorney Alan Dershowitz and billionaire Glenn Dubin– have denied any wrongdoing, and being named in the documents does not link any individual to a crime.
The controversial bit would be pointing out that pedophilia itself is a disorder and doesn't mean somebody has acted on the impulses that constitute said disorder. It goes on to argue that someone with this disorder ought to be able to receive treatment for it so as to be less likely to harm children.Strange to try dunking on NYT for an op-ed from 2014 that was likely published specifically because it was controversial.
Opinion pages? How do it work?
But nice job on posting a ten year old op-ed On the ball as usual.
The author of the op ed for the new york times for starters.Of course not. Has anyone here ever argued that point?
Yet it was democrat dick durbin who actively fought to keep the epstein records under seal. So weird. Almost like you're a fuc<ing idiot..lol? Really? That?
Because Trump would be way way ahead of him on the pedophile probability list if that were your logic. You idiot.
you tardos read it yet? @Phenomenally Frantastic @Scruddy ?
Show me in the article where the author argues this. I gave you the text. Quote it.The author of the op ed for the new york times for starters.
Yet it was democrat dick durbin who actively fought to keep the epstein records under seal. So weird. Almost like you're a fuc<ing idiot..
Ducking out of that convo of democrat dick durbin protecting epstein allies I see. I'm not surprised tbh. He seems your type.Show me in the article where the author argues this. I gave you the text. Quote it.
lol.Dude what happened to you? Snap out of it. Defending pedophilia to virtue signal these psycho liberals?