ADVERTISEMENT

No, we're not going to forget

Yet you're the one continuing to push it. Now, you seem to want to "back away", when challenged with actual science literature.

Why is that?
You're trying to counter a vaccine schedule talking point with a COVID vaccine paper. WTF did you want me to do with that? LMAO
 
As well as the people who did the research discovering that "childhood infections" are directly linked to autism.
I've already told you that something trying to tell me the absurd notion that the actual rate of autism has remained constant throughout history isn't worth my time. If anyone else wants to be dumb enough to believe that then so be it. It's an inconvenient absurdity that is necessary to accept in order to buy into your complete nonsense. In addition, it counters OTHER science done by OTHER scientists that notes the rate of autism has NOT remained constant throughout history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MichaelKeller99
I've already told you that something trying to tell me the absurd notion that the actual rate of autism has remained constant throughout history isn't worth my time. If anyone else wants to be dumb enough to believe that then so be it. It's an inconvenient absurdity that is necessary to accept in order to buy into your complete nonsense. In addition, it counters OTHER science done by OTHER scientists that notes the rate of autism has NOT remained constant throughout history.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
You're trying to counter a vaccine schedule talking point with a COVID vaccine paper.

No.

I've countered a "vaccine schedule/autism talking point" with data from >5 years ago that demonstrates viral and bacterial INFECTIONS trigger ASD. NOT vaccines. Something I've linked for you at least 6 times now.

And there is not a single study on autism and vaccines which has demonstrated any link.
 
I've already told you that something trying to tell me the absurd notion that the actual rate of autism has remained constant throughout history isn't worth my time. If anyone else wants to be dumb enough to believe that then so be it. It's an inconvenient absurdity that is necessary to accept in order to buy into your complete nonsense. In addition, it counters OTHER science done by OTHER scientists that notes the rate of autism has NOT remained constant throughout history.
Autism rates are stable? The CDC begs to differ 🤣

2000 1 in 150
2004 1 in 125
2006 1 in 110
2008 1 in 88
2010 1 in 68
2014 1 in 59
2018 1 in 44
2020 1 in 36
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
Autism rates are stable? The CDC begs to differ 🤣

2000 1 in 150
2004 1 in 125
2006 1 in 110
2008 1 in 88
2010 1 in 68
2014 1 in 59
2018 1 in 44
2020 1 in 36
Again: definitions have changed.

Know what else causes inflammation and is everywhere in greater amounts since 2000?

Microplastics.
 
I've already told you that something trying to tell me the absurd notion that the actual rate of autism has remained constant throughout history isn't worth my time. If anyone else wants to be dumb enough to believe that then so be it. It's an inconvenient absurdity that is necessary to accept in order to buy into your complete nonsense. In addition, it counters OTHER science done by OTHER scientists that notes the rate of autism has NOT remained constant throughout history.
Holy crap, is Andrew Wakefield going to trigger some Pharma execs with this movie! 🤣

 
The hits keep coming.


 
The hits keep coming.



Looks like your links indicate Covid is linked to psych issues; vaccines are not.
 
The cumulative incidence of depression, anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders, sleep disorders, and sexual disorders at three months following COVID-19 vaccination were higher in the vaccination group than no vaccination group.

…data suggest a potential link between young age, mRNA, and viral vector vaccines with new-onset psychosis within 7 days post-vaccination.
 
This is amazing, even for Trump. The guy who rushed an untested vaccine into market, threatening the head of the FDA along the way, is now going to go after Big Pharma for, uhh, putting ‘profits above people’. 🤣

 
  • Love
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
This is amazing, even for Trump. The guy who rushed an untested vaccine into market, threatening the head of the FDA along the way, is now going to go after Big Pharma for, uhh, putting ‘profits above people’. 🤣

Trump got duped like the rest of us. Worse than that, he got duped on other things as well. and in his effort to get credit, misquoted what he was told about possible remedies and treatments. Fauci was undoubtedly laughing his ass off every time.
 
Conflicts of interest with vaccines....what? That never happens! :rolleyes:😆😆😆😆
Big Pharma basically ‘stacking the court’ here. :mad:

Recently, the Department of Health and Human Service (HHS) announced that it had finally filled eight vacant positions and added an additional voting member to ACIP (which advises CDC on which vaccines should be administered within the United States, how often, and to whom), bringing the number to sixteen voting members: seven of these nine individuals have direct financial ties to vaccine manufacturers, and many have received multi-million dollar grants from NIH.

 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
The cumulative incidence of depression, anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders, sleep disorders, and sexual disorders at three months following COVID-19 vaccination were higher in the vaccination group than no vaccination group.

…data suggest a potential link between young age, mRNA, and viral vector vaccines with new-onset psychosis within 7 days post-vaccination.

So? You continue to post out of context nonsense w/o sourcing.

Meanwhile, actual studies show far worse outcomes from Covid exposure.
 
You idiots are getting your immunology information from a "computer scientist"?

Do you go to plumbers or auto mechanics for your annual wellness checkups?
And this country’s #1 selling covid jab comes from a company run by a veterinarian and rushed into production by a grifting reality show host and convicted felon.

🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
Why do you care who the CEO is, and what his experience is? He is a businessman. Not the scientist developing the vaccine.
And not just any veterinarian, but one whose previous claim to fame was in the highly specialized area of boar taint eradication.

To his credit, a recent study conducted by Pfizer has revealed that 100% of their covid vaccine recipients have remained boar taint free since receiving their injections.
 
You idiots are getting your immunology information from a "computer scientist"?

Do you go to plumbers or auto mechanics for your annual wellness checkups?
There are plenty of other experts that don't agree with you about vaccines.

And, I'd put Dr. Seneff up against your vaccine knowledge any day of the week.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MichaelKeller99
The hits keep coming.


That might explain the recent postings of a couple of people who wait in line for a vaccine booster like it's a flash sale for a Taylor Swift concert.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MichaelKeller99
No; they are internet memes.
You post zero publications or studies to support your nonsense here.
I and others have posted COUNTLESS publications firmly supporting our position. Is it a memory problem on the back end or a mental block on the front end?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT