ADVERTISEMENT

No, we're not going to forget

No; it is not.
It is an immune reponse (over-response) to a viral infection.

Vaccines mimic viral infections and create the same immune responses.
That's far too simplistic of a viewpoint. There are way too many other variables for you to make that assumption.
 
I read enough of it.
And your buddy linked one of the sources, which makes no mention of linking "vaccinations" to "excess deaths".

And we already clearly know that Covid causes lots of serious, long term health problems. Like diabetes, etc, which makes people who cannot get care far more likely to end up dead later.
It's the vaccines.
 
That's far too simplistic of a viewpoint.
It is an accurate viewpoint.

It is not a "virus" or "vaccine" that directly causes the GBS; it is the person's over-reactive immune response to certain viral triggers.

If it "only ever" occurred with vaccines, you would have a relevant point; but the fact is that it occurs much more frequently in response to actual infections. And vaccination rates are generally much higher than infection rates for most stuff, which means the risk level is far far higher when you get a viral infection
 
Anti-vaxxers are the new hypochondriacs.
No. Lunatics like Deborah Birx are the new hypochondriacs. And anyone who takes people like her and Fauci seriously.

Birx said that every cow should be getting tested weekly for the bird flu, adding that there are likely some undetected cases in humans.

 
No. Lunatics like Deborah Birx are the new hypochondriacs. And anyone who takes people like her and Fauci seriously.

Birx said that every cow should be getting tested weekly for the bird flu, adding that there are likely some undetected cases in humans.


No. Anti-vaxxers are the new hypochondriacs. Everything is out to get you boys.
 
No. Anti-vaxxers are the new hypochondriacs. Everything is out to get you boys.
hypochondriac
2 of 2

noun

: a person who is often or always worried about his or her own health

Birx and her ilk, and those gullible enough to heed their advice, are the real hypochondriacs.

Pro-vaxxers are the new Nazis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
No. Anti-vaxxers are the new hypochondriacs. Everything is out to get you boys.
If something is waging a serious attack freedom and we want to defend it all of a sudden we're a hypochondriac? Especially when it's loss of freedom because of hypochondriacs. How just really f'n stupid of a thought is that?
 
If something is waging a serious attack freedom and we want to defend it all of a sudden we're a hypochondriac? Especially when it's loss of freedom because of hypochondriacs. How just really f'n stupid of a thought is that?

That's why you're the NEW hypochondriacs. They're the old ones.

"Serious attack on freedom." Lulz. You've already mastered the drama queen aspects of the old hypos I see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funksouljon
In summary, we find no patterns in the overall set of models that suggests a clear relationship between COVID-19 government responses and outcomes. Strong claims about government responses’ impacts on COVID-19 may lack empirical support.

All the bullshit we were subjected to by the real hypochondriacs was all for nothing, and now Birx wants to swab 40 million cows/week looking for an imaginary boogeyman? Freaking clowns.

 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
In summary, we find no patterns in the overall set of models that suggests a clear relationship between COVID-19 government responses and outcomes. Strong claims about government responses’ impacts on COVID-19 may lack empirical support.

All the bullshit we were subjected to by the real hypochondriacs was all for nothing, and now Birx wants to swab 40 million cows/week looking for an imaginary boogeyman? Freaking clowns.


That analysis looks pretty shaky to me - diluted by "overall country" datasets, and not digging down into localized information, say at a county level.

When you dilute data like that, your study power disappears.

This could be a useful analysis, if they increased their study power by looking at smaller population "bits"; lumping it all together makes little sense, really.

They even state this in their caveats:

We note that all our models examined short-term epidemic outcomes following policy responses (2 or 4 weeks), but that long-term outcomes remain an important but largely unexamined area of study. Third, country-level data hide more nuanced patterns that may be discernible in analyses of more granular data.

  • They ONLY looked at "2-4 week windows", for one.
  • And "country level data" is precisely what I'd just stated for you, above.

Conclusions here are mostly garbage, and overstated due to those two limiting points.
 
This. Imagine being called a hypochondriac by a hypochondriac. 🤡 Delusion at it's finest.

giphy.gif
 
That's why you're the NEW hypochondriacs. They're the old ones.

"Serious attack on freedom." Lulz. You've already mastered the drama queen aspects of the old hypos I see.
If you want to think standing firm on freedom is analogous with being a hypochondriac, then you be you.
 
If you want to think standing firm on freedom is analogous with being a hypochondriac, then you be you.

Stand guard and stand tall brother naturalbh - everything is definitely out to get you! Science. Governments. Industry. People. Air. I heard if you don't wash your hands you'll be able to fend it all off. Think reverse OCD. It's the new way for the new vax hypochondriac. Godspeed.
 
You are flailing

Continue to bring up debunked bullshit, pretty much on a daily basis.
Your BS claims on CIDRAP and Paul Offit re: face masks are the definition of flailing.

Everything you fascist hypochondriacs imposed (or tried to impose) on America and the rest of the world failed. On the positive side at least it woke a few people

Ignorance & deception on a grand scale.
 
Meanwhile....in news related to the Anti-Vax League Fearmongering on Excess Deaths...




We, as the Princess Máxima Center, want to emphasize that we strongly support vaccination, and that this publication should certainly not be read as an argument against vaccination. The study in no way demonstrates a link between vaccinations and excess mortality; that is explicitly not the researchers' finding. We therefore regret that this impression has been created.
 
One of the chief vaccinologists in the world admitted under oath that these vaccines weren’t adequately tested to determine whether or not they can/do cause autism.

Simply embarrassing the fraud these people have been allowed to perpetrate on the American people.

There were no ‘gotcha’ questions. Just an admission of fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT