No, we're not going to forget
- Thread starter naturalbornhawk
- Start date
I'd bet on it being just a boatload of disinformation that you will slurp down like Gospel.
What could be interesting? That the Daily Caller might actually do factual reporting?
Don’t look now but the post above you is a YouTube video from a poster who constantly says ‘YouTube videos aren’t science!!!’
Certainly there are peer-reviewed RCT’s, conducted by university sponsored PhD’s in immunology refuting this detoxification of the mRNA spike protein from the human body…
Uh....and the Youtube video is about purging mRNA from your body by drinking pee thru your nose.
'Nuff said...
It’s not ‘data’ and it’s not a peer-reviewed study.
It’s not the kind of stuff a scientist like you should be posting.
Whitmer and all her fellow Covidians earned all the scorn they’re receiving. People aren’t buying what they’re selling anymore.
I guess that’s why they’re contemplating Spring boosters now? 🤡
Criminal fraud.
It’s worth noting that no confounding factors were identified in all 39 cases. The fact that 19 were simply written off due ‘limited information available’ shows complete indifference and inaction on behalf of Pfizer and BioNTech by not bothering to investigate these deaths, or even attempt to seek out further information.
For the remaining 20 cases, the report states, ‘causality between the vaccination and the occurrence of the fatalities cannot be ruled out, based on the temporal relationship, although no laboratory data or autopsy results provided evidence of a causal relationship.’
This carefully worded statement by Pfizer/BioNTech does not deny the possibility that vaccination was the cause of death but hides behind the lack of ‘evidence of a causal relationship’, rendering it moot.
This FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) released pharmacovigilance document reveals that for these fatal cases, autopsies were either simply not done; unknown if done or the reason, ‘limited information was provided’ is given.
This lack of investigation into these child/adolescent deaths is egregious, particularly since it is highly unusual for a young person to experience either a pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, ruptured aneurysm, cardiac failure, to name but a few of the devastating adverse events resulting in death.
Dr Clare Craig, a UK based diagnostic pathologist, spoke exclusively to Children’s Health Defense, Europe about the issue of autopsies and vaccination: ‘There is a catch 22. A series of post-mortems demonstrating the mechanisms of action of the vaccine could be used as evidence of a mechanism, but pathologists largely won’t make the connection in an individual until they’ve seen such a series published. The tail wags the dog.
It’s worth noting that no confounding factors were identified in all 39 cases. The fact that 19 were simply written off due ‘limited information available’ shows complete indifference and inaction on behalf of Pfizer and BioNTech by not bothering to investigate these deaths, or even attempt to seek out further information.
For the remaining 20 cases, the report states, ‘causality between the vaccination and the occurrence of the fatalities cannot be ruled out, based on the temporal relationship, although no laboratory data or autopsy results provided evidence of a causal relationship.’
This carefully worded statement by Pfizer/BioNTech does not deny the possibility that vaccination was the cause of death but hides behind the lack of ‘evidence of a causal relationship’, rendering it moot.
This FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) released pharmacovigilance document reveals that for these fatal cases, autopsies were either simply not done; unknown if done or the reason, ‘limited information was provided’ is given.
This lack of investigation into these child/adolescent deaths is egregious, particularly since it is highly unusual for a young person to experience either a pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, ruptured aneurysm, cardiac failure, to name but a few of the devastating adverse events resulting in death.
Dr Clare Craig, a UK based diagnostic pathologist, spoke exclusively to Children’s Health Defense, Europe about the issue of autopsies and vaccination: ‘There is a catch 22. A series of post-mortems demonstrating the mechanisms of action of the vaccine could be used as evidence of a mechanism, but pathologists largely won’t make the connection in an individual until they’ve seen such a series published. The tail wags the dog.
The Tragedy of the Child Deaths: EU’s 3rd damning vaccine safety report, Part 2
Part 1 of my analysis of the Periodic Safety Update Report #3 (PSUR #3) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, covering the 6-month period of 19 December 2021 through to 18 June 2022, focused on the disturbing pregnancy and lactation cases. Part 2 of the report focuses on the tragic...
childrenshealthdefense.eu
Criminal fraud.
It’s worth noting that no confounding factors were identified in all 39 cases. The fact that 19 were simply written off due ‘limited information available’ shows complete indifference and inaction on behalf of Pfizer and BioNTech by not bothering to investigate these deaths, or even attempt to seek out further information.
For the remaining 20 cases, the report states, ‘causality between the vaccination and the occurrence of the fatalities cannot be ruled out, based on the temporal relationship, although no laboratory data or autopsy results provided evidence of a causal relationship.’
This carefully worded statement by Pfizer/BioNTech does not deny the possibility that vaccination was the cause of death but hides behind the lack of ‘evidence of a causal relationship’, rendering it moot.
This FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) released pharmacovigilance document reveals that for these fatal cases, autopsies were either simply not done; unknown if done or the reason, ‘limited information was provided’ is given.
This lack of investigation into these child/adolescent deaths is egregious, particularly since it is highly unusual for a young person to experience either a pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, ruptured aneurysm, cardiac failure, to name but a few of the devastating adverse events resulting in death.
Dr Clare Craig, a UK based diagnostic pathologist, spoke exclusively to Children’s Health Defense, Europe about the issue of autopsies and vaccination: ‘There is a catch 22. A series of post-mortems demonstrating the mechanisms of action of the vaccine could be used as evidence of a mechanism, but pathologists largely won’t make the connection in an individual until they’ve seen such a series published. The tail wags the dog.
The Tragedy of the Child Deaths: EU’s 3rd damning vaccine safety report, Part 2
Part 1 of my analysis of the Periodic Safety Update Report #3 (PSUR #3) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, covering the 6-month period of 19 December 2021 through to 18 June 2022, focused on the disturbing pregnancy and lactation cases. Part 2 of the report focuses on the tragic...childrenshealthdefense.eu
Children's Health Defense is propaganda, spud.
And what is highlighted is accurate: all of those "events" occurred at rates consistent with population averages.
