Will they present him with a new boom box?
Will they present him with a new boom box?
No. ST as mentioned, but no on the convention. I have a co-worker who has gone several times and he and his wife enjoyed it. The Sammy love will be worth the price of admission this year.Is anyone here going to CubsCon?
Hard to say. They have enough flexibility with swingmen and Roki is so cheap that it doesn’t necessarily have to hold back a move before Sasaki, but assuming the next week is going to be mostly dead then it’s roughly 3 weeks until Sasaki signs.I’m a little surprised more deals didn’t go down this weekend, especially with so many of the big names off the board. For the Cubs they need to add bullpen arms, and it seems like those guys would be wanting to line things up before the holidays. The money and contract length isn’t going to change much for these guys, I’d be telling my agent to get the deal done.
I don’t discount a trade, but that doesn’t have to happen until ST starts. And, with my obvious Sasaki obsession maybe Jed is in a holding pattern for now when it comes to a trade for a SP.
Relievers a team is better off grabbing as many power arms or unique cheap arms as they can. Have 4 or 5 shakeout. Leave the big contract guys if you’re one step away or flush with dumb money.Hard to say. They have enough flexibility with swingmen and Roki is so cheap that it doesn’t necessarily have to hold back a move before Sasaki, but assuming the next week is going to be mostly dead then it’s roughly 3 weeks until Sasaki signs.
I do agree about the relievers. While there are some higher priced guys out there, it doesn’t seem like the kind of market waiting for like Tanner Scott to drop.
Looked at the deal. Fish didn’t get much quality there. The catcher prospect will be 27. The young guys don’t seem to have done anything yet. Hopefully for the Fish’s sake they are toolsy.I wonder what they wanted from the Cubs? Phillies also got a catcher in the deal.
Link - Luzardo trade
WHich makes me wonder what they wanted from the Cubs. Kind of feel like Luzardo for a bag of balls from the Phillies.Looked at the deal. Fish didn’t get much quality there. The catcher prospect will be 27. The young guys don’t seem to have done anything yet. Hopefully for the Fish’s sake they are toolsy.
Phillies gave up a top 100 prospect ranked between Triantos and Cassie, although he’s super young so nowhere near the bigs. Cassie was a no go for Luzardo to me. I guess we’ll see how it goes as if Luzardo is healthy and good we’ll wish we made the trade with Triantos, but obviously there’s a big risk on both of those (especially health)WHich makes me wonder what they wanted from the Cubs. Kind of feel like Luzardo for a bag of balls from the Phillies.
My guess is the Marlins wanted way too much, and as advanced as the trade talks were, I wonder if the Cubs had access to Luzardo's medical file, or on their own decided he wasn't worth the risk. The Phillies big prospect in the trade was their top IFA guy last year. At best even for the Marlins he's 4-5 years from the majors.WHich makes me wonder what they wanted from the Cubs. Kind of feel like Luzardo for a bag of balls from the Phillies.
It’s a really good reliever market right now. Even Tanner Scott doesn’t seem to be at elite reliever prices. Expensive and some closer premium attached, but not $20M+ money like Diaz, Hader, etc., at least at this point. Apart from Scott, I really like AJ Minter, Andrew Chafin, Kirby Yates, Kyle Finnegan, Ryne Stanek and others. Lots of options available. Would like the Cubs to add 1-2.Relievers a team is better off grabbing as many power arms or unique cheap arms as they can. Have 4 or 5 shakeout. Leave the big contract guys if you’re one step away or flush with dumb money.
Yeah, the Cubs perspective was likely a mix of concern over medicals (that was reported) and also perhaps Philly wanting something higher in the Cubs system than Triantos.Phillies gave up a top 100 prospect ranked between Triantos and Cassie, although he’s super young so nowhere near the bigs. Cassie was a no go for Luzardo to me. I guess we’ll see how it goes as if Luzardo is healthy and good we’ll wish we made the trade with Triantos, but obviously there’s a big risk on both of those (especially health)
Probably also a good guy for Ballesteros, especially, to work with and learn from.The Cubs have signed minor league journeyman Carlos Perez to be their emergency catcher stashed at AAA. Not sure which one, as there are two, and they are apparently related. This one has spent 16 years knocking around the minors with a few call ups to the majors.
He'll do if forced to make an emergency move due to an injury. He's probably a pretty capable guy working with pitchers given his longevity. This will be a nice bit of insurance to keep Ballesteros and Aliendo at AAA getting the work they need.
Probably a good thing to have a bilingual caddy for both Ballesteros and Aliendo. Ballesteros I have seen being interviewed, and his English needs work. Having a veteran around to impress upon young guys how critical it is to be able to communicate in English and Spanish would be a boost. Perez, Aliendo and Ballesteros were all born. in Venezuela, oddly enough.Probably also a good guy for Ballesteros, especially, to work with and learn from.
+$2 million over as the numbers are released.Cubs actually have gone over multiple years in a row. From 2016-2020, the Cubs had the 4th, 9th, 5th, 2nd and 3rd highest payrolls in baseball. Some of that is Theo being more naturally aggressive than Jed, but also Theo had some absolute disasters in there that led to a tightening of the check book. The Cubs will absolutely spend the $25M save on Bellinger. Look for them to end the offseason within $8-10M of the CBT so that they have money for in-season acquisitions and I think if things are really going well, they could push past that.
If this season is a good season (division winning, wins a playoff series, etc.) - the Cubs will make a hard run at Kyle Tucker (if they can’t get him locked up early) and they will be over CBT next year. This year might be a re-set after they completely screwed up the CBT last year.
I am not an apologist, and Jed has made some real bone headed moves, see my mention of Mancini and Barnhart, but he is in good shape as long as he keeps making moves. He needs an impact starter, and bullpen help. I think the starter comes via a trade, and the musical chairs of bullpen arms is starting to heat up. Add a competent bench bat and he’s built a better roster. With the available money and prospects he can add during the season.I think this offseason is definitely one that can’t really be graded until it’s over. It may not be confusing at all in the end. Kind of like walking into a restaurant kitchen mid-service without knowing the menu at all. A bunch of things mixing and half-cooked and no idea whether it’ll be good in the end.
I am not worried about the bullpen arms. They really only have room to add 1-2 and there are at least 6-7 guys on the market I like and that’s without even considering bringing back Jorge Lopez, who I like. Bench bat should be fine as well. Curious about the starter. Sasaki would be the big win, but I’m not counting on that. Trade does seem likely, but there’s also been a surprising amount of Burnes chatter that I’m not buying.I am not an apologist, and Jed has made some real bone headed moves, see my mention of Mancini and Barnhart, but he is in good shape as long as he keeps making moves. He needs an impact starter, and bullpen help. I think the starter comes via a trade, and the musical chairs of bullpen arms is starting to heat up. Add a competent bench bat and he’s built a better roster. With the available money and prospects he can add during the season.
Burnes chatter seems agent driven. It’s the same as the talk of the Cubs getting in late on Bregman. Unless he eventually decides on a deal with opt outs it’s just agent talk trying to move teams.I am not worried about the bullpen arms. They really only have room to add 1-2 and there are at least 6-7 guys on the market I like and that’s without even considering bringing back Jorge Lopez, who I like. Bench bat should be fine as well. Curious about the starter. Sasaki would be the big win, but I’m not counting on that. Trade does seem likely, but there’s also been a surprising amount of Burnes chatter that I’m not buying.
All I want for Christmas is a belated gift of Sasaki signings with the Cubs.I am not worried about the bullpen arms. They really only have room to add 1-2 and there are at least 6-7 guys on the market I like and that’s without even considering bringing back Jorge Lopez, who I like. Bench bat should be fine as well. Curious about the starter. Sasaki would be the big win, but I’m not counting on that. Trade does seem likely, but there’s also been a surprising amount of Burnes chatter that I’m not buying.
Original op is still salty about the Cubs having a more recent WS ring than the team he followsWhere’s Hoyer’s motivation to improve the team? His contract is up after this year and he has not been extended. That’s #1.
Also, Wrigley doesn’t sell out. In 2022, they had their lowest attendance in 25 years (sine 1997) and Marquee ratings were way down, so it’s not true that Wrigley just sells out all the time no matter what the Cubs do.
That kid deserves a break. Hopefully he stays healthy and gets his shot at the majors.Yankees signed Brennen Davis to a minor league contract.
Brennen to Yankees
It's a good writeup. I rolled my eyes when I first saw Jesse's piece, but a good follow up from Brett here.My eyes tend to glaze over when I see CBA and PEI when it comes to my favorite team, but Brett Taylor has thoughts on the Jesse Rogers piece about how the Cubs may avoid any mega deals until after the next CBA is signed, that Marquee is not pulling in the expected revenue, and how PE investors may be impacting decisions for the Cubs.
![]()
The Financial Operations of the Chicago Cubs, Avoiding Megadeals, and the Implications of Private Equity Investment - Bleacher Nation
We know that the Chicago Cubs are a business. Sometimes we forget that they operate like it.www.bleachernation.com
It's a good writeup. I rolled my eyes when I first saw Jesse's piece, but a good follow up from Brett here.
It depends. I bought a Powerball ticket. If I win I’m going to buy a stake in the team and make a few changes.After reading those two articles, I put the chances of a Tucker extension at .001%.