i wasn't sleeping...i was just resting my eyes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i wasn't sleeping...i was just resting my eyes
Your “normal” bias might need to be recalibrated. Most normal people think he is a crook who deserves prosecution. The polls tell that story convincingly.I hope he does. Most normal people think he's being persecuted frankly.
I mean the guy made a poster and coffee mugs from his mug shot. Do you think he cares about Biden using a few court room photos?
Gotta show the whole list, yo...
Just LOL all over the place. They've gone from the "Restore Honor and Dignity to the White House" party to the "Everybody's a criminal so big whoop" party.repeat after me: you can always find a crime.
Really? Biden actually exercises and appears to have a healthy body weight, morbidly obese Trump drives golf courts right onto greens so he can keep from walking.Not that it could ever happen but if they were to do a foot race I like Trump's chances.
Yeah, that is complete BS.repeat after me: you can always find a crime.
I mean, sure it is. I'm not sure how one can look at the totality and really think otherwise if one were being honest.
What is different is the scope of the allegations this time.indeed, this particular tool isn't. what is a little different is the size of the toolbox
It's gotta stay >$17.50 or he can't instantly acquire 36M more shares, yo!!!DJT stock is $27?????
I gotta find more suckers!
Actually, the stuff that occurs in federal proceedings, whether they involve Hunter or Donald, is ginormously more trustworthy than the things that are occurring in state proceedings. And last I checked, Hunter has in fact been indicted (albeit not on the wilder types of things suggested), has he not? As I said, these are now the rules of politics. Indeed, when you hear clamoring for an AG to appoint a special counsel of one sort or another, the clamoring is not in fact regarding whether the AG would otherwise be political in the matter. Rather, it's because the appointed counsel pretty much knows that they have to produce an indictment. A strange irony indeed.sure...to the "both sides" idiots who think there is no difference between hunter's laptop allegations on social media and actually presenting evidence in criminal court...its all the same
And last I checked, Hunter has in fact been indicted (albeit not on the wilder types of things suggested), has he not?
He is probably playing with his monopoly money he believes to be real.It's gotta stay >$17.50 or he can't instantly acquire 36M more shares, yo!!!
Where's Rico!!!???
and i'm saying that what's happening to trump is not newActually, the stuff that occurs in federal proceedings, whether they involve Hunter or Donald, is ginormously more trustworthy than the things that are occurring in state proceedings. And last I checked, Hunter has in fact been indicted (albeit not on the wilder types of things suggested), has he not? As I said, these are now the rules of politics. Indeed, when you hear clamoring for an AG to appoint a special counsel of one sort or another, the clamoring is not in fact regarding whether the AG would otherwise be political in the matter. Rather, it's because the appointed counsel pretty much knows that they have to produce an indictment. A strange irony indeed.
Perhaps you dont. I am not surprised.Your “normal” bias might need to be recalibrated. Most normal people think he is a crook who deserves prosecution. The polls tell that story convincingly.
I don’t know a single moderate independent who thinks Trump is being prosecuted without cause.
Do you know what indicted means? Maybe Im confused as to your comments so pardon me if I misunderstand.Trump's getting indicted. No two ways about that. Prosecutors have signed checks by Trump to Cohen to pay Stormy off and proof that he later claimed these were legal fees. He screwed on that.
As for anything campaign related, he probably skates. Way to hard to prove that Donny try to kill the cheating story for his campaign instead of his personal life.
Do you not think Trump should’ve been impeached?I mean, sure it is. I'm not sure how one can look at the totality and really think otherwise if one were being honest.
But so what? The rules by which the game is played have changed. Both sides take turns crossing lines, and this is just another line that has been crossed. It is what it is, and it is and will be the new reality of modern politics, where impeachments are doled out like candy (or at least were, as now we seem to be more focused on the front end). Candidates just have to deal with it.
Rico???? Picking up aluminum cans in the Median near Prairie Meadows today.It's gotta stay >$17.50 or he can't instantly acquire 36M more shares, yo!!!
Where's Rico!!!???
It might be hard to seat a jury, if the potential jurors are being honest. Trump would definitely not be able to get a jury from this forum.
Juror question 21.
A. Do you have any political, moral, intellectual, or religious beliefs or opinions which might prevent you from following the Court's instructions on the law or which might slant your approach to this case?
B. Do you have any political, moral, intellectual or religious beliefs or opinions that would interfere with your ability to render a verdict in this criminal case?
26. Can you give us an assurance that you will be fair and impartial and not base your decision in this case upon a bias or prejudice in favor of or against a person who may appear in this trial, on account of that person's race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability, sexual orientation or political views?
27. Can you promise to guard against allowing stereotypes or attitudes about individuals or about groups of people, referred to as an implicit bias, influence your decision?
29.
G. Are you signed up for or have you ever been signed up for, subscribed to, or followed any newsletter or email listserv run by or on behalf of any anti-Trump group or organization?
H. Do you currently follow any anti-Trump group or organization on any social media site, or have you done so in the past?
33. Can you give us your assurance that you will decide this case solely on the evidence you see and hear in this courtroom and the law as the judge gives it?
37. Do you have any opinions about the legal limits governing political contributions?
38. Can you promise to set aside anything you may have heard or read about this case and render your verdict based solely on the evidence presented in this courtroom and the law as given to you by the judge?
Of course there are also quite a few questions of similar nature to exclude Trump supporters, of which there aren't very many of those here.
I'm going to have to record this trial daily to watch at night.
I thought it wasnt televised? Or do you legal types have some sort of closed circuit access we dont?I'm going to have to record this trial daily to watch at night.
Seems politically motivated and election interference.
You’re missing the point. He’s not in process but for politics.Call back in when Hunter has a WH appointment or gets put in charge of the "Middle East Peace Process" or something...
ElaborateBased on what we know of this judge and his family I would be shocked to see any real justice here. Corruption runs deep.
Yeah, but there were a lot of questions on the jury questionaire aimed at Trump supporters as well, so if they were being honest, they would also be disqualified.He only needs 1 of 12 to side with him. That's 8%. He got 24% of the NYC vote in 2020. The odds are well in his favor.
The cult members will say he's looking heavenwards to receive God's blessings.