My statement is that a second civil war won’t occur in the United States, Joe. And you seem to agree.
Ohio state senator warns of ‘civil war’ if Trump loses in November
- Thread starter cigaretteman
- Start date
My statement is that a second civil war won’t occur in the United States, Joe. And you seem to agree.
Don’t think there would be any violence. If there is it would be in DC. The rednecks won’t torch their own stuff on their state.
We, the people. Could that mean that the assumption that another civil war isn’t going to happen in the United States is correct?
Joe, I’ve said all along that we’re not going to have another civil war. Do you agree with that?
It doesn't need to be their own stuff if they are doing it in their own state or area.
I don’t see a Republican state’s citizens burning down their own states stuff. We will find out.
What do you mean by their own stuff? I can see them going after polling stations, election workers, government buildings, etc. There is precedence.
‘People’ - as in a bunch of gun-owning hillbillies, can’t declare war on the United States; that ‘right’ is reserved to governments.
But tools like you seem to think the US government should be able to drone strike a random bunch of gun owners because…they own guns?
Libs are weird.
Trump does love the poorly educated
If a citizen joins a group to declare war on the US, you don't think they are an enemy of the country?
Sure. Like the colonists and the King of England.
But we were the good guys then, lol.
Hmmmmm.... when did the US declare war on the King of Englad?
Maybe this’ll help…
Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for.
www.google.com
Yes, you've said there won't be a 2nd Civil War multiple times. But why the clarification on Riley's post? Then when Joe gives you the explanation, you go into some hyper sensitive individual about always claiming there won't be a 2nd Civil War. It's a weird take but pretty BAU for you in these threads.
I liked it better when you tried to fight @Here_4_a_Dav that one thread. You're out of your element in these threads.
No I don't and you don't either. That's why I'm not sure why you went full dipshit on Riley's post.
Since we're in question mode. Did Joe's response make sense to you?
Did Trump stop the insurrection when he was President on Jan 6th? The way you answer that will determine if this conversation should continue or I should tune in when you're fighting trolls. My guess is the latter, but I've been surprised before
I get a kick out of them saying a civil war would be over before it started. Which with today’s weapons is probably true. Whoever got the first shot in would pretty much end it. But they pretend like they wouldn’t be hiding in mom and dad’s basement or bomb shelter.
Hell if a civil war took out all the extremists on both sides would it really be that bad?
He didn’t. I think he wanted his crazed, brainwashed followers to raise as much hell in WDC as possible. Probably elsewhere too.
If Americans haven’t revolted over anything done to them the past hundred years or so then there’s probably nothing that will push them over the edge. 🤷♂️
OK. That's a start. Now you grasp @RileyHawk and @Joes Place response or where are you still missing it logically?
Right before Thanksgiving and Christmas? In the middle of football season? Plus it will be cold out. I don’t think I’ll RSVP for post election combat.
Who was in charge of security/crowd control that day?
Fact checking Rep. Jordan's claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio suggested Wednesday that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had been responsible for the security presence at the US Capitol on January 6, after Pelosi rejected his appointment to serve on the select committee investigating the insurrection.
amp.cnn.com
What’s missing here is you not understanding what I wanted Riley to admit.
Just gonna say, this guy would be absolutely no ****ing help to his side during a civil war
I don’t know.
If shit really really really goes south, and we are at the point of cannibalism, he looks well-marbled.
The Sergeant of Arms should have approved more security but Trump's silence on that day was deafening and inexcusable given that he had organized a rally and instructed the protesters to go to the Capitol. When the violence started he should have been out front and immediately telling them to stand down, but he just watched for hours.Who was in charge of security/crowd control that day?
Fact checking Rep. Jordan's claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio suggested Wednesday that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had been responsible for the security presence at the US Capitol on January 6, after Pelosi rejected his appointment to serve on the select committee investigating the insurrection.
Who was in charge of security/crowd control that day?
Fact checking Rep. Jordan's claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio suggested Wednesday that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had been responsible for the security presence at the US Capitol on January 6, after Pelosi rejected his appointment to serve on the select committee investigating the insurrection.
The sitting President.
So you’re not disputing CNN’s take.
It’s crazy how ten years ago, an unarmed black lady (Miriam Carey) was shot 5 times, and killed, as she drove away from officers who were on edge because she got ‘too close’ to the White House.
Her one year old infant - in the back seat and also unarmed - fortunately escaped the hail of bullets that struck her mom from behind.
Yet the people in charge of protecting the Capitol on J6 - fully anticipating a huge, potentially violent crowd that day - didn’t have the foresight to have a huge security force on hand that day? It shouldn’t have mattered if Trump himself had painted his face, William Wallace style, and led the charge at the front of the pack. NO ONE should have gotten within a quarter mile of that shithole that day.
Systemic failure.
Trump's lackeys prevented any support from the federal government here. Even put out memos to let his minions run rampant.
Once again, you’re full of crap. Trump’s ‘lackeys’ had nothing to do with the government incompetence that day. In spite of all the warnings and alarms going off in their collective little brain, government ‘security’ failed again.
The United States Capitol Police(USCP) had not planned for a riot or attack.[1] The Capitol Police Board – consisting of the Architect of the Capitol, the House Sergeant at Arms, and the Senate Sergeant at Arms – has the authority to request the National Guard to the Capitol but made the decision on January 3 not to do so.[2]
Takeaways from the Senate report on January 6 security failures
Two Senate committees on Tuesday released the most comprehensive government report on the security failures leading up to the US Capitol insurrection on January 6, revealing new details about unheeded warnings, critical miscommunications and intelligence shortcomings.
amp.cnn.com
January 6 committee probes security failures as GOP counter-investigation looms
More than 80 officials from law enforcement and federal agencies have testified to the House committee investigating the Capitol insurrection, including members of the Secret Service, in what investigators believe will be the most extensive review yet of security failures that led to the US...
amp.cnn.com
Yes.
They did.
They instructed the government to stand down against Trump protestors, and then despite pleas from Congress to shore up defenses, Trump sat on his ass and watched what he initiated on TV for 3 hours.
Amusing that you cite the Jan 6 Committee, which fully identified Trump as responsible for the violence that day, and for doing nothing to prevent it.January 6 committee probes security failures as GOP counter-investigation looms
More than 80 officials from law enforcement and federal agencies have testified to the House committee investigating the Capitol insurrection, including members of the Secret Service, in what investigators believe will be the most extensive review yet of security failures that led to the US...
We were the good guys after we won,.. The "good" guys always win, because it's the winners that get to write the history.
What's missing is any semblance of intelligence by you.
It's fun watching you get your ass kicked.
Quoted within the report you posted.Once again, you’re full of crap. Trump’s ‘lackeys’ had nothing to do with the government incompetence that day. In spite of all the warnings and alarms going off in their collective little brain, government ‘security’ failed again.
The United States Capitol Police(USCP) had not planned for a riot or attack.[1] The Capitol Police Board – consisting of the Architect of the Capitol, the House Sergeant at Arms, and the Senate Sergeant at Arms – has the authority to request the National Guard to the Capitol but made the decision on January 3 not to do so.[2]
Takeaways from the Senate report on January 6 security failures
Two Senate committees on Tuesday released the most comprehensive government report on the security failures leading up to the US Capitol insurrection on January 6, revealing new details about unheeded warnings, critical miscommunications and intelligence shortcomings.
January 6 committee probes security failures as GOP counter-investigation looms
More than 80 officials from law enforcement and federal agencies have testified to the House committee investigating the Capitol insurrection, including members of the Secret Service, in what investigators believe will be the most extensive review yet of security failures that led to the US...
"Apparently, the Senate investigation was significantly watered down before it even started.
This is one the many reasons why so many Democrats, Republicans, former US officials, national security experts, and US Capitol Police officers agree that there should be an independent commission to investigate January 6. Not just to look at narrow questions but to examine the big picture -- extremism, disinformation, radicalization, incitement, and much more.
Senate Republicans blocked a bill to establish a commission, which now appears to be dead."
You're good at mining material to post. The trait of conspiracy fruitcakes. You must have not read it all or would have removed this text or omitted this report all together.
Why not take this off HROT and put it on whatever platforms conspiracy theorists and weirdos peddle their garbage.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
COMMIT: Iowa Lands 2026 Iowa City West, Three-Star OL Colin Whitters
- Latest: clayborn_94
-