Believe me, I get what you're saying. I understand how ANYONE would believe that the issues from the Civil War are "simple." I don't agree that they are simple, personally, because I have seen, and been exposed to, so much from all sides involved that I know it's not that simple, overall, to me. But, as I've said, I am all for removing these statues because they are rallying points for white supremacists. We don't need that kind of ignorance if we want to be a highly-evolved, civilized society. History cannot be erased. I learned more about history out of school than I ever did in school. And, "history" is also a subjective thing. That's a challenge for most people to ever accept."Part of" the motivation, as in the hidden motivation. Fake memorials were the PC reason at the time.
If you want to keep the flies out of your house, don't leave big piles of shit laying around....
How does that change JP's argument?You're such an idiot. The vast majority were donated by legacy groups, the sons and daughters of those who fought and died defending their states and hometowns.
How does that change JP's argument?
I am ambivilent about the statues. They should have been banned initially and now they stand 150 years later. Let the local governments erase them as they will. There is too much culture wrapped up in it for us Yankees to dictate the south's removal of the statues.
This is in Iowa. Do you want to remove it?
http://www.iowacivilwarmonuments.com/cgi-bin/gaarddetails.pl?1210173217~2
How does that change JP's argument?
This is in Iowa. Do you want to remove it?
http://www.iowacivilwarmonuments.com/cgi-bin/gaarddetails.pl?1210173217~2
If it becomes the next KKK rallying point, yes.
If it's mostly ignored by the fascists, then it's fine where it is.
Clue for you: The only reason those people are marching around the statues is because activists are demanding that they be torn down. Get your cause and effect straight.
Clue for you: The only reason those people are marching around the statues is because activists are demanding that they be torn down. Get your cause and effect straight.
I reckoned the statue was voted to be removed by Charlottesville but racists from Michigan and further moved in to rally around it? Correct me if I am wrong.
Because Michigan Nazis should ALWAYS have the ability to dictate what other local towns decide to do with their locally funded statues, bro!
Only thing WORSE than Michigan Nazis is Illinois Nazis....
Not wrong. This is a completely predictable reaction. Those statues have been standing for more than 100 years in many cases. It's absolutely ridiculous, and goes to the point of the column in the original post. There would have been no Alt-Right rally if people weren't trying to tear down the statue that has been standing with zero controversy until Dylan Roof came along.
The activists are potentially giving Dylan Roof what he said he wanted to start: A race war.
Because Michigan Nazis should ALWAYS have the ability to dictate what other local towns decide to do with their locally funded statues, bro!
Only thing WORSE than Michigan Nazis is Illinois Nazis....
If the alt right doesn't come around the statue moves without interest. Of that there is no doubt.
I can't support the alt right though beikg that they are literal trash.
Go hang with those racists pedos for a week and report back.
I do not associate myself with them. I am a Libertarian at heart, and my values are in direct conflict with white supremacist/nationalist values.
But my values are very much in line with the "heritage, not hate" and freedom of speech and expression part of this issue.
Our differences mostly are between your laissez faire and my socialism.
Can you do me a favor and edit out the site I mentioned. Pretty please
I used to try and get on-board with "Heritage Not Hate" crowd until I realized that most of those people were flat-out racists. I was a member of the SCV. They were a bunch of white guys who clung to the "Lost Cause" bullshit. They didn't hate black people on an individual basis, but they were empowering and commemorating a supremacist society. I was out of there.I do not associate myself with them. I am a Libertarian at heart, and my values are in direct conflict with white supremacist/nationalist values.
But my values are very much in line with the "heritage, not hate" and freedom of speech and expression part of this issue.
I used to try and get on-board with "Heritage Not Hate" crowd until I realized that most of those people were flat-out racists. I was a member of the SCV. They were a bunch of white guys who clung to the "Lost Cause" bullshit. They didn't hate black people on an individual basis, but they were empowering and commemorating a supremacist society. I was out of there.
The culture changes, man. Everything is always changing. When I was a little boy in the 1970's, I saw the places I lived (NC, VA, SC) and saw Rebel Flags and they were all just benign symbols. But, I was a white kid. I had no understanding of what it meant, potentially, to black kids. Once I finally realized that, well into adulthood, my attitude changed drastically. I felt sort of ashamed of my ignorance. So, while I empathize with people who are kids of the Baby Boomers, I still know that we're going through a phase where that Old South stuff is unpopular, and it's unpopular for a very good reason. It may shift to a more benign, nostalgic perspective in another 50 years.
Crib notes: OP and other deplorable are willing to start a civil war and kill other Americans in order to keep monuments honoring long dead traitorous racists.
It is simply wrong to destroy historical monuments without some sort of safety or development reason.
Well, they will remove them safely, I'm sure. They'll get professionals to dismantle them.It is simply wrong to destroy historical monuments without some sort of safety or development reason.
Or, at least suggest the threat of it possibly happening.Crib notes: OP and other deplorable are willing to start a civil war and kill other Americans in order to keep monuments honoring long dead traitorous racists.
Or, at least suggest the threat of it possibly happening.
He refuses to be "Reconstructed."
I see Trad and I think of this:
Seems to me there is a whole lot of taking into account the "feelings" of only one side of the statues mean something different posit. I'm guessing the other side might feel a different way about them. Maybe there should be another war to settle it once and for all. This time no mercy for the losers?
I'm very familiar with them.They're actually a very accomplished bluegrass band. Thanks for posting.
Here's another.
You want me to respect someone's opinion that all jews should be killed and those damn ******s need to be lynched?How about everybody just respects everybody else's freedom of expression?