ADVERTISEMENT

Opinion: Biden has a golden opportunity to change how we approach marijuana

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,738
59,331
113
Opinion by
Paul Waldman
Columnist
March 19, 2021 at 12:30 p.m. CDT

As he has on so much else, President Biden has evolved on the issue of marijuana as the years have passed and American society has changed. But maybe not fast enough, as the Daily Beast reports:
Dozens of young White House staffers have been suspended, asked to resign, or placed in a remote work program due to past marijuana use, frustrating staffers who were pleased by initial indications from the Biden administration that recreational use of cannabis would not be immediately disqualifying for would-be personnel, according to three people familiar with the situation.
This is almost certainly not a crackdown directed by the president himself; the more likely culprit is institutional inertia, in which long-standing policies are slow to change even as the world outside the organization does.

But what it shows is that the federal government is in many ways still gripped by an anti-cannabis ideology that has more in common with 1936’s “Reefer Madness” than the real world of 2021.
It’s overdue for an overhaul. And Biden is just the man for the job.

We have an extraordinary mismatch between, on the one hand, what most Americans believe about cannabis and how many laws around it are rapidly changing, and on the other hand, the way employers, including the federal government and the White House, continue to treat it.
AD

ADVERTISING

As a public, we’re moving toward consensus that marijuana is, if not for everyone, a drug that people should be able to use if they wish without fear of legal repercussions. In terms of consequences like addiction and violence, it’s far less dangerous than alcohol, which supports a legal industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
While as recently as the 1990s only a quarter of Americans thought marijuana should be legalized, that number has steadily risen; in a Gallup poll late last year, 68 percent said it should be legal.

A big part of the reason is that as time has gone on, more and more of the population have experience with it and know that smoking a joint won’t fry your brain like an egg.
Every year the federal government does a big survey on what drugs people have used, both recently and over their lifetimes. In the 2019 data, 49.2 percent of Americans over 18 said they had used marijuana at some point (and given that some people will be reluctant to admit that to an interviewer, the real number is almost certainly higher). Which of course includes people in every industry and walk of life, including politics.
AD

There are now 15 states (plus D.C.) where marijuana is legal for recreational use, and 36 states that have legalized medical marijuana. Legalization ballot measures have won overwhelmingly in red, blue, and purple states. The House passed a federal reform measure last year, and Senate Democrats say they want to do the same.

Perhaps most importantly, the heart of the anti-marijuana ideology — the idea that smoking it even once leaves an indelible mark on you as a moral reprobate, a dangerous criminal, or a potential traitor to your country — now strikes most Americans as preposterous.
Yet employer drug testing remains an incredibly large and lucrative industry, one that grew out of the “Just Say No” era in the 1980s. While it has declined somewhat in recent years, it’s still prevalent in workplaces across the country; according to this 2018 survey, 63 percent of employers used drug testing as part of screening for prospective employees.
AD

That includes the federal government, where it’s as though J.Edgar Hoover wrote the regulations they still operate under, driven by the belief that anyone who ever smoked pot must be some kind of comsymp who might sell America out to the Reds.

Which brings us to Biden. If you asked the president whether he thinks that one of his staffers who used marijuana a decade or a year ago poses a risk to the public as they compile a report on soybean yields for an upcoming trade summit, I’m sure he’d say no. That’s despite the fact that he probably never smoked it himself, as someone who was already a practicing lawyer with a wife and child at home when the kids gathered at Woodstock in 1969.
But while he might not exactly be on the forefront of progressive thinking when it comes to changing views about cannabis, in the 2020 campaign it looked like he was catching up.
AD

While many of the other Democratic presidential candidates called for full legalization of cannabis, Biden was more cautious. He advocated removing federal criminal penalties, leaving the decision on legalizing it for recreational use to states, and moving marijuana from Schedule 1, which classifies it as “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse,” to Schedule 2, which would still classify it as dangerous but make research easier to conduct.

As on other issues, the “moderate” position Biden took represented a significant shift from the thinking of just a few years before. He may still be behind where most Americans are, but he’s moving in the right direction.
Which is why he has the credibility to create a change in White House policy, one that can be a model for the rest of the government and eventually private companies as well. He can say that he now understands that there’s no reason to assume that if someone has used cannabis in the past then they can’t do their jobs with competence and integrity.
AD

The next step would be to say that not only should the White House stop asking about past marijuana use on its background check, it should drop testing for it altogether, especially since it’s legal in the District of Columbia and a test can show use that occurred weeks prior.

That would be a revolutionary thing for Biden to advocate. But he’s shown that he can change with the times, even in ways that surprise people, and he has a way of making his shifts seem eminently sensible. It’s time for him to do it again.

 
Personally, living in a state that legalized marijuana that's surrounded by states that haven't and likely won't for a while, and then taxing the ever living f**k out of it is working out well for me. I hope we just keep it at the state level and leave it out of the national level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Personally, living in a state that legalized marijuana that's surrounded by states that haven't and likely won't for a while, and then taxing the ever living f**k out of it is working out well for me. I hope we just keep it at the state level and leave it out of the national level.

Would you agree at least that there shouldn't be federal law against marijuana or the people that use it? That really needs to go.
 
Would you agree at least that there shouldn't be federal law against marijuana or the people that use it? That really needs to go.

Of course. But we effectively have that now. Being anti-marijuana legalization is a political loser in most areas of the country. Even states that have legislatures that won't legalize it often have strong support to do so. Unfortunately, it's just another case of Republican voters not caring if the people in office don't do the things they want them to do.

But, yeah, it should be up to the states on what they want to do. Actually, I think that's the way it is for tobacco and alcohol too, but I could be wrong.
 
Of course. But we effectively have that now. Being anti-marijuana legalization is a political loser in most areas of the country. Even states that have legislatures that won't legalize it often have strong support to do so. Unfortunately, it's just another case of Republican voters not caring if the people in office don't do the things they want them to do.

But, yeah, it should be up to the states on what they want to do. Actually, I think that's the way it is for tobacco and alcohol too, but I could be wrong.

Maybe some would say this isn’t a bad thing, but the federal law does continue to create problems. The biggest is banking (which I think is getting easier), but there are other issues where the federal law creates a burden.

Personally I just think it’s silly. It’s very apparent we’re all willing to let our grandparents govern us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BioHawk and mnole03
Personally, living in a state that legalized marijuana that's surrounded by states that haven't and likely won't for a while, and then taxing the ever living f**k out of it is working out well for me. I hope we just keep it at the state level and leave it out of the national level.
Yeah, the medical marijuana regulatory scheme in Florida has made several people millionaires.
 
The easy answer is to legalize it and tax it but there are some practical implications you have to consider. If you do legalize it and start collecting tax revenue and anyone who's of age can just walk into Walgreens and get some marijuana, how do you figure out who's cool?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red Hills Nole
The easy answer is to legalize it and tax it but there are some practical implications you have to consider. If you do legalize it and start collecting tax revenue and anyone who's of age can just walk into Walgreens and get some marijuana, how do you figure out who's cool?
T-shirts.
 
The easy answer is to legalize it and tax it but there are some practical implications you have to consider. If you do legalize it and start collecting tax revenue and anyone who's of age can just walk into Walgreens and get some marijuana, how do you figure out who's cool?

You just ask them. “Are you cool?” It still works.
 
Yeah, the medical marijuana regulatory scheme in Florida has made several people millionaires.

Legalization in any state will make people millionaires. It just varies on who has access to those opportunities. There's a lot of money to be made in pot sales.
 
Legalization in any state will make people millionaires. It just varies on who has access to those opportunities. There's a lot of money to be made in pot sales.
Oh, trust me, I know. Especially when the state initially limits it to 5 licenses. I saw one small farm get a license and sold it for $50 million.
 
Opinion by
Paul Waldman
Columnist
March 19, 2021 at 12:30 p.m. CDT

As he has on so much else, President Biden has evolved on the issue of marijuana as the years have passed and American society has changed. But maybe not fast enough, as the Daily Beast reports:

This is almost certainly not a crackdown directed by the president himself; the more likely culprit is institutional inertia, in which long-standing policies are slow to change even as the world outside the organization does.

But what it shows is that the federal government is in many ways still gripped by an anti-cannabis ideology that has more in common with 1936’s “Reefer Madness” than the real world of 2021.
It’s overdue for an overhaul. And Biden is just the man for the job.

We have an extraordinary mismatch between, on the one hand, what most Americans believe about cannabis and how many laws around it are rapidly changing, and on the other hand, the way employers, including the federal government and the White House, continue to treat it.
AD

ADVERTISING

As a public, we’re moving toward consensus that marijuana is, if not for everyone, a drug that people should be able to use if they wish without fear of legal repercussions. In terms of consequences like addiction and violence, it’s far less dangerous than alcohol, which supports a legal industry worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
While as recently as the 1990s only a quarter of Americans thought marijuana should be legalized, that number has steadily risen; in a Gallup poll late last year, 68 percent said it should be legal.

A big part of the reason is that as time has gone on, more and more of the population have experience with it and know that smoking a joint won’t fry your brain like an egg.
Every year the federal government does a big survey on what drugs people have used, both recently and over their lifetimes. In the 2019 data, 49.2 percent of Americans over 18 said they had used marijuana at some point (and given that some people will be reluctant to admit that to an interviewer, the real number is almost certainly higher). Which of course includes people in every industry and walk of life, including politics.
AD

There are now 15 states (plus D.C.) where marijuana is legal for recreational use, and 36 states that have legalized medical marijuana. Legalization ballot measures have won overwhelmingly in red, blue, and purple states. The House passed a federal reform measure last year, and Senate Democrats say they want to do the same.

Perhaps most importantly, the heart of the anti-marijuana ideology — the idea that smoking it even once leaves an indelible mark on you as a moral reprobate, a dangerous criminal, or a potential traitor to your country — now strikes most Americans as preposterous.
Yet employer drug testing remains an incredibly large and lucrative industry, one that grew out of the “Just Say No” era in the 1980s. While it has declined somewhat in recent years, it’s still prevalent in workplaces across the country; according to this 2018 survey, 63 percent of employers used drug testing as part of screening for prospective employees.
AD

That includes the federal government, where it’s as though J.Edgar Hoover wrote the regulations they still operate under, driven by the belief that anyone who ever smoked pot must be some kind of comsymp who might sell America out to the Reds.

Which brings us to Biden. If you asked the president whether he thinks that one of his staffers who used marijuana a decade or a year ago poses a risk to the public as they compile a report on soybean yields for an upcoming trade summit, I’m sure he’d say no. That’s despite the fact that he probably never smoked it himself, as someone who was already a practicing lawyer with a wife and child at home when the kids gathered at Woodstock in 1969.
But while he might not exactly be on the forefront of progressive thinking when it comes to changing views about cannabis, in the 2020 campaign it looked like he was catching up.
AD

While many of the other Democratic presidential candidates called for full legalization of cannabis, Biden was more cautious. He advocated removing federal criminal penalties, leaving the decision on legalizing it for recreational use to states, and moving marijuana from Schedule 1, which classifies it as “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse,” to Schedule 2, which would still classify it as dangerous but make research easier to conduct.

As on other issues, the “moderate” position Biden took represented a significant shift from the thinking of just a few years before. He may still be behind where most Americans are, but he’s moving in the right direction.
Which is why he has the credibility to create a change in White House policy, one that can be a model for the rest of the government and eventually private companies as well. He can say that he now understands that there’s no reason to assume that if someone has used cannabis in the past then they can’t do their jobs with competence and integrity.
AD

The next step would be to say that not only should the White House stop asking about past marijuana use on its background check, it should drop testing for it altogether, especially since it’s legal in the District of Columbia and a test can show use that occurred weeks prior.

That would be a revolutionary thing for Biden to advocate. But he’s shown that he can change with the times, even in ways that surprise people, and he has a way of making his shifts seem eminently sensible. It’s time for him to do it again.


HAD a golden opportunity. Not “has”. He just blew his opportunity by allowing the WH employees to be fired.
 
Oh, trust me, I know. Especially when the state initially limits it to 5 licenses. I saw one small farm get a license and sold it for $50 million.

They probably left a billion on the table in that deal, easily.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT